⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Alexandra A Peter”

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2024-06-25 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-3528 Page: 1 of 35 Filed: 06/25/2024 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 22-3528 ALEXANDRA M. JACKSON, APPELLANT, V. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 971
Matter of Jayveon S. (Alexandra C.) (2018 NY Slip Op 00971) Matter of Jayveon S. (Alexandra C.) 2018 NY Slip Op 00971 Decided on February 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Rep
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022-04-21 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ERIC PETER HEWITT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D21-2461 [April 21, 2022] Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Kathleen H. Roberts, J
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2013-10-01 · Published · cited 19× · 498 B.R. 392
GODOY, Bankruptcy Judge. Steven Weiss, the chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”), appeals from: (1) a bankruptcy court order denying his motion for summary judgment against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) on his complaint seeking to avoid a certain mortgage granted by the debtors to Wells Fargo, because of an allegedly defective acknowledgment; and (2) granting Wells Fargo’s cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reas
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015-03-17 · Published · cited 5× · 91 F. Supp. 3d 113; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32777; 2015 WL 1206176
FINDINGS OF FACT, RULINGS OF LAW, AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of an accident (the “Underlying Accident”) that occurred on February 23, 2011, when an employee of A & W Maintenance, Inc. (“A & W”) sustained injuries after falling into an open clarifier tank while performing services at a water treatmen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-05-04 · Published · cited 27× · 32 F.4th 1198
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETER DONATUS UDO, No. 20-70078 Petitioner, Agency No. V. A208-309-125 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted November 18, 2021 San Francisco, California Filed May 4, 2022 Before: Sidney R. Thomas and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges, and Donald W. Molloy,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge McKeown
Alaska Supreme Court · 2021-02-19 · Published · cited 3× · 480 P.3d 1200
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ALEXANDRA WERBA, ) ) Supreme Court No. S
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017-03-02 · Published · cited 76× · 850 F.3d 58; 2017 WL 816878
POOLER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants CBF Industria de Gusa S/A, Da Terra Siderúrgica LTDA, Fergumar — Ferro Gusa do Maranháo LTDA, Ferguminas Siderúrgica LTDA, Gusa Nordeste S/A, Sidepar — Siderúrgica do Para S/A, and Siderúrgica Uniáo S/A (collectively, “appellants” or “award-creditors”) appeal two judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sweet, J.) dismissing bot
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-09-21 · Published · cited 2× · 506 F.3d 1051; 2007 WL 2741365; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22529
506 F.3d 1051 (2007) EURODIF S.A., Compagnie Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires, and Cogema, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Ad Hoc Utilities Group, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, and Usec Inc. and United States Enrichment Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 2007-1005, 2007-1006. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 2
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016-08-16 · Published · cited 49× · 833 F.3d 1299; 62 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2023; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15030; 2016 WL 4361936
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Alexandra H. appeals from the district court’s grant of Defendant Oxford Health Insurance, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on Alexandra’s claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 259 U.S.C. § 1001 (“ERISA”). Alexandra sought benefits for continued partial hospital treatment for her anorexia, which were denied on th
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-06-09 · Published · cited 4× · 226 So. 3d 301; 2017 WL 2491564; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8539
SLEET, Judge. Destination Boat Clubs, Inc., appeals the order denying its motion for attorney fees and costs after Destination received a judgment in its favor in proceedings supplementary against Island Breeze Boat Club and Rentals, Inc., and Peter, Bessy, and Alexandra Stavrou. We affirm the order to the extent that it denied fees and costs against Peter Stavrou individually. H
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-10-25 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 NY Slip Op 7433; 154 A.D.3d 927; 62 N.Y.S.3d 513
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, West-chester County (Jamieson, J.), dated March 31, 2016, which, upon an order of the same court dated February 29, 2016, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000-03-30 · Published · cited 184× · 208 F.3d 72; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5658
208 F.3d 72 (2nd Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v.THOMAS ZICHETTELLO, Defendant,FRANK RICHARDONE, RONALD REALE, RICHARD HARTMAN, JAMES J. LYSAGHT, and PETER KRAMER, Defendants-Appellants. Docket Nos. 98-1376 (L), 98-1377, 98-1378, 98-1379, 98-1380August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Argued: June 8, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 226 So. 3d 293; 2017 WL 2373446; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7774
MORRIS, Judge. Peter Thomas Stavrou, Alexandra Stav-rou, and Bessy Stavrou appeal from a final judgment upon impleader wherein the circuit court awarded Destination Boat Clubs, Inc. (Destination), a total of $59,900 in proceedings supplementary. For the reasons explained herein, we affirm in part and reverse in part. The proceedings supplementary award was
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001-04-11 · Published · cited 3× · 144 F. Supp. 2d 1334; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10988; 2001 WL 460117
144 F.Supp.2d 1334 (2001) GENERAL CIGAR HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALTADIS, S.A.; Altadis U.S.A., Inc.; and Consolidated Cigar Holdings Inc., Defendants. No. 00-4187-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. April 11, 2001. *1335 Robert T. Wright, Jr., Ignacio Sanchez, John D. Eaton, Verner, Liipfert, Be
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005-03-03 · Published · cited 1× · 411 F.3d 1355; 26 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2377; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3567
PROST, Circuit Judge. This interlocutory appeal comes to us from the United States Court of International Trade, which certified four separate questions for appeal to this court. The Ad Hoc Utilities Group (“AHUG”), Eurodif S.A. (“Eurodif’), Compagnie Generate des Matieres Nucleates (“CGMN”) and Coge-ma, Inc. appeal two issues from the Court of International Trade. The United States, USEC, Inc. and the United States Enrichme
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005-09-09 · Published · cited 8× · 423 F.3d 1275; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19438
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING PROST, Circuit Judge. ORDER More than three months after we decided this case, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Services, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 2688, 162 L.Ed.2d 820 (2005). In letters disclosing <
Ballard v. Statepublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2013-06-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2013 Ohio 2412; 136 Ohio St. 3d 83; 990 N.E.2d 590
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded on the authority of Dunbar v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-2163, 992 N.E.2d 1111. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
In re Alexandra C.public domain
New York City Family Court · 1993-03-08 · Published · cited 9× · 157 Misc. 2d 262
*263OPINION OF THE COURT Guy P. De Phillips, J. A joint decision is rendered in these two disparate proceedings to resolve a common legal issue of much concern to the Bench and Bar, to wit, the meaning and legal implications as to enforceability of the recent new legislative pronouncement contained in Social Services Law § 383-c entitled "Guardianship
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018-03-01 · Published · cited 1× · 812 S.E.2d 299
Doyle, Presiding Judge. Jerome Edmondson refinanced property he owned with his wife, Alena. The Bank of New York Mellon ("Mellon") filed this action against the Edmondsons seeking to: replace an original security deed that was allegedly executed at the closing and lost prior to recordation and reformation of the county records to reflect the replacement deed; a declaratory judgment; or