Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alexandra A Peter”
Alexandra M. Jackson v. Denis McDonoughpublic domain
Case: 22-3528 Page: 1 of 35 Filed: 06/25/2024 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 22-3528 ALEXANDRA M. JACKSON, APPELLANT, V. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.
Matter of Jayveon S. (Alexandra C.)public domain
Matter of Jayveon S. (Alexandra C.) (2018 NY Slip Op 00971) Matter of Jayveon S. (Alexandra C.) 2018 NY Slip Op 00971 Decided on February 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Rep
ERIC PETER HEWITT v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ERIC PETER HEWITT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D21-2461 [April 21, 2022] Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Kathleen H. Roberts, J
Weiss v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Kelley)public domain
GODOY, Bankruptcy Judge. Steven Weiss, the chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”), appeals from: (1) a bankruptcy court order denying his motion for summary judgment against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) on his complaint seeking to avoid a certain mortgage granted by the debtors to Wells Fargo, because of an allegedly defective acknowledgment; and (2) granting Wells Fargo’s cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reas
A & W Maintenance, Inc. v. First Mercury Insurancepublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT, RULINGS OF LAW, AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of an accident (the “Underlying Accident”) that occurred on February 23, 2011, when an employee of A & W Maintenance, Inc. (“A & W”) sustained injuries after falling into an open clarifier tank while performing services at a water treatmen
Peter Udo v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETER DONATUS UDO, No. 20-70078 Petitioner, Agency No. V. A208-309-125 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted November 18, 2021 San Francisco, California Filed May 4, 2022 Before: Sidney R. Thomas and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges, and Donald W. Molloy,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge McKeown
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ALEXANDRA WERBA, ) ) Supreme Court No. S
CBF Indústria de Gusa S/A v. AMCI Holdings, Inc.public domain
POOLER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants CBF Industria de Gusa S/A, Da Terra Siderúrgica LTDA, Fergumar — Ferro Gusa do Maranháo LTDA, Ferguminas Siderúrgica LTDA, Gusa Nordeste S/A, Sidepar — Siderúrgica do Para S/A, and Siderúrgica Uniáo S/A (collectively, “appellants” or “award-creditors”) appeal two judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sweet, J.) dismissing bot
Eurodif S.A. v. United Statespublic domain
506 F.3d 1051 (2007) EURODIF S.A., Compagnie Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires, and Cogema, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Ad Hoc Utilities Group, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, and Usec Inc. and United States Enrichment Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 2007-1005, 2007-1006. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 2
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Alexandra H. appeals from the district court’s grant of Defendant Oxford Health Insurance, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on Alexandra’s claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 259 U.S.C. § 1001 (“ERISA”). Alexandra sought benefits for continued partial hospital treatment for her anorexia, which were denied on th
SLEET, Judge. Destination Boat Clubs, Inc., appeals the order denying its motion for attorney fees and costs after Destination received a judgment in its favor in proceedings supplementary against Island Breeze Boat Club and Rentals, Inc., and Peter, Bessy, and Alexandra Stavrou. We affirm the order to the extent that it denied fees and costs against Peter Stavrou individually. H
McDonald v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, West-chester County (Jamieson, J.), dated March 31, 2016, which, upon an order of the same court dated February 29, 2016, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.
208 F.3d 72 (2nd Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v.THOMAS ZICHETTELLO, Defendant,FRANK RICHARDONE, RONALD REALE, RICHARD HARTMAN, JAMES J. LYSAGHT, and PETER KRAMER, Defendants-Appellants. Docket Nos. 98-1376 (L), 98-1377, 98-1378, 98-1379, 98-1380August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Argued: June 8, 1999
Stavrou v. Destination Boat Clubs, Inc.public domain
MORRIS, Judge. Peter Thomas Stavrou, Alexandra Stav-rou, and Bessy Stavrou appeal from a final judgment upon impleader wherein the circuit court awarded Destination Boat Clubs, Inc. (Destination), a total of $59,900 in proceedings supplementary. For the reasons explained herein, we affirm in part and reverse in part. The proceedings supplementary award was
General Cigar Holdings, Inc. v. Altadis, S.A.public domain
144 F.Supp.2d 1334 (2001) GENERAL CIGAR HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALTADIS, S.A.; Altadis U.S.A., Inc.; and Consolidated Cigar Holdings Inc., Defendants. No. 00-4187-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. April 11, 2001. *1335 Robert T. Wright, Jr., Ignacio Sanchez, John D. Eaton, Verner, Liipfert, Be
Eurodif S.A. v. United Statespublic domain
PROST, Circuit Judge. This interlocutory appeal comes to us from the United States Court of International Trade, which certified four separate questions for appeal to this court. The Ad Hoc Utilities Group (“AHUG”), Eurodif S.A. (“Eurodif’), Compagnie Generate des Matieres Nucleates (“CGMN”) and Coge-ma, Inc. appeal two issues from the Court of International Trade. The United States, USEC, Inc. and the United States Enrichme
Eurodif s.a. v. United Statespublic domain
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING PROST, Circuit Judge. ORDER More than three months after we decided this case, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in National Cable & Telecommunications Ass’n v. Brand X Internet Services, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 2688, 162 L.Ed.2d 820 (2005). In letters disclosing <
Ballard v. Statepublic domain
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded on the authority of Dunbar v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-2163, 992 N.E.2d 1111. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.
In re Alexandra C.public domain
*263OPINION OF THE COURT Guy P. De Phillips, J. A joint decision is rendered in these two disparate proceedings to resolve a common legal issue of much concern to the Bench and Bar, to wit, the meaning and legal implications as to enforceability of the recent new legislative pronouncement contained in Social Services Law § 383-c entitled "Guardianship
Doyle, Presiding Judge. Jerome Edmondson refinanced property he owned with his wife, Alena. The Bank of New York Mellon ("Mellon") filed this action against the Edmondsons seeking to: replace an original security deed that was allegedly executed at the closing and lost prior to recordation and reformation of the county records to reflect the replacement deed; a declaratory judgment; or