Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re APPLICATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, FOR AN Grand Jury Action No. 19-48 (BAH) ORDER AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF CERTAIN GRAND JURY MATERIALS Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MEMORANDUM OPINION GR

507 F.3d 281 (2007) Lumumba Kenyatta INCUMAA, a/k/a Theodore Harrison, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathan E. OZMINT, Director, SCDC, Defendant-Appellee. No. 04-7824. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: September 25, 2007. Decided: October 29, 2007. *282 ARGUED: Robert Alexander Schwartz, Arnold

709 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2010) In re TRASYLOL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION— MDL-1928. This Document Relates To: All Actions. Case No. 08-MD-01928. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 27, 2010. *1324 Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt Johnson Osborne & LeClainche, John Scarola, Brenda S. Fulmer, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &am;

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN

694 F.Supp.2d 1192 (2009) In re WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. In re Washington Mutual, Inc. Securities Litigation This Document Relates to: All Cases. Case Nos. 2:08-md-1919 MJP, C08-387 MJP. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. October 27, 2009. *1202 James Abram Har

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0231p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS; ┐ COLUMBUS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS; OHIO │ DEMOCRATIC PARTY,

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 831–941 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

174 F.Supp.2d 70 (2001) In re INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 21 MC 92(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 28, 2001. *71 *72 Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel: Melvyn I. Weiss, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Saferstein, Esq., Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

06-15-00145-CR CLERK'S RECORD Volume !_of 1 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS

18-1697-cr United States v. Weaver In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 18-1697-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CALVIN WEAVER,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

478 F.Supp.2d 775 (2007) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al. v. Alberto R. GONZALES in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States. Civil Action No. 98-5591. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 22, 2007. *776 *777 Addison F. Golladay, Benjamin Sahl, Chr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

BARKETT, Circuit Judge: Eleven defendants appeal their convictions for drug trafficking offenses after a jury trial. Seven of these defendants also appeal their sentences. We address each *1199 of the defendants’ arguments in turn, and AFFIRM the convictions and sentences of Williams, Casado, Har

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. (2019 NY Slip Op 03883) Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. 2019 NY Slip Op 03883 Decided on May 16, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department

22-2908(L) Antonyuk v. James UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2022 Argued: March 20, 2023 Decided: December 8, 2023 Remanded by S. Ct.: June 21, 2024 Decided on Remand: October 24, 2024 Docket Nos. 22-2908(L), 22-2972(Con) ____________________ IV

22-2908 (L); 22-2933; 22-2987; 22-3237 Antonyuk; Hardaway; Christian; Spencer v. Chiumento UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2022 Argued: March 20, 2023 Decided: December 8, 2023 Docket Nos. 22-2908 (L), 22-2972 (Con); 22-2933; 22-2987; 22-3237 ______________

jLeahNed, P. J.: The action is, in part at least, for the refusal to return executions. The refusal is not denied. There is, therefore, a technical right of recovery. But the defendant may mitigate the damages in such cases; and, in strictness, it woidd be for the defendant to show that he could not have made the money within the life of the executions. But the cause seems to have been tried on the theory th