Cases

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS September 5, 2025 CR-2025-0342 Jerry Alexander Sanchez v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Lee Circuit Court: CC- 21-648.70) NOTICE You are hereby notified that on September 5, 2025, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled. D. Scott Mitchell, C

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-24-00399-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF AMANDA MAE SANCHEZ AND CHARLES ALEXANDER SANCHEZ AND IN THE INTEREST OF C.A.S., A CHILD On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-2024-FM-0753, Hono

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA November 14, 2025 SC-2025-0707 Ex parte Jerry Alexander Sanchez PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: Jerry Alexander Sanchez v. State of Alabama) (Lee Circuit Court: CC-21- 648.70; Criminal Appeals: CR-2025-0342). CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by th

Judgment Modified and Affirmed as Modified and Opinion filed February 6, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00268-CR ALEXANDER PORTERFIELD SANCHEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 147th District Court Travis County, Texas

Order filed, September 6, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-18-00268-CR ____________ ALEXANDER PORTERFIELD SANCHEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 147th District Court

WALLACE, Chief Judge: Sanchez appeals from his sentence for distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. He argues that the district court erred by sentencing him for transactions involving other distributions of heroin because: (1) they fail to qualify as relevant conduct under the Sentencing Guidelines; and (2) even if they do, the resulting

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered on or about September 25, 2015, which granted plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of defendants and direct a new trial, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants. The verdict is based on a fair interpretation of

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J), rendered November 3, 2011, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Lopez,

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J), rendered November 3, 2011, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Lopez,

Due to his incarceration, plaintiff defaulted by failing to appear at a preliminary conference (22 NYCRR 202.27). The only remedy for plaintiffs default in these circumstances is not an appeal, but rather a motion in Supreme Court to vacate the default (see Campos v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 307 AD2d 785, 786 [2003]). In the present posture of the case, there is no appealable order for this Court to review. Finally, we note that pl

Fahey, J. Applications in Criminal Cases for Leave to Appeal Denied.

MEMORANDUM ** Christian Alexander Sanchez-Herrera, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for adjustment of status and ordering him removed to Guatemala. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). We deny the petition for review. T

ORDER Helen Perkins-Alexander filed a complaint for damages and equitable relief alleging that an assistant United States attorney, three DEA agents, two deputy federal marshals, and a Peoria, Illinois neighborhood association conspired “individually and officially” to seize her home and her rental property. The residence was forfeited in 1996 because Perkins-Alexander’s husband had been using it to facilitate the drug trafficking consp

MEMORANDUM ** Christian Alexander Sanchez-Herrera, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for adjustment of status and ordering him removed to Guatemala. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). We deny the petition for review. T

MEMORANDUM*** Edwin Alexander Sanchez-Gaitan and his wife Yesika Y. Rivera de Sanchez, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, see Meza

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

585 S.E.2d 327 (2003) 41 Va. App. 319 Hugo Alexander SANCHEZ, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 2969-01-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Alexandria. August 26, 2003. *329 Jeanne E. Klapps, Senior Assistant Public Defender (Office of the Public Defender, on brief), for appellant. John H. McLees

585 S.E.2d 337 (2003) 41 Va. App. 340 Hugo Alexander SANCHEZ a/k/a Alexander Hugo Ortega v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 2970-01-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Alexandria. August 26, 2003. *339 Jeanne E. Klapps, Senior Assistant Public Defender (Office of the Public Defender, on brief), for appel

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING ALCALA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined. On our own motion, we issue this opinion in the place of our October 6, 2010 opinion. Sanchez v. State,

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER delivered the opinion of the Court. This criminal case involves charges of sexual assault. Defendant testified on his own behalf at trial and denied the allegations. At *455the start of his cross-examination, the prosecution asked whether he had come to the United States legally. Over an objection, the jury learned that defendant