Cases

OPINION LEWIS, Judge. T1 Mica Alexander Martinez, Appellant, was tried by jury and found guilty of Counts 1 and 2, murder in the first degree, in violation of 21 O.8.8upp.2009, § 701.7(A); and Count 3, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 21 0.8.8upp.2006, § 645, in Comanche County District Court, Case No. CF-2009-478. The jury f

MEMORANDUM ** Noe Martinez Paredes appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month *582sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Through this lawsuit, Plaintiffs Kelly Alexander and Donald Porter (“Plaintiffs” unless otherwise noted) seek damages and injunctive relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. (“ADA”). The jurisdiction of this court is premised on federal question jurisdiction in accordance with 2

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 3, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-0149 Lower Tribunal No. 19-3215A ________________ Alexander Martinez-Rivero, Appellant,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1250-12 MARK ALEXANDER FLEMING, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND COURT OF APPEALS DENTON COUNTY K ELLER, P.J., filed a dis

49 Cal.4th 35 (2010) 109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 514 231 P.3d 259 MIGUEL MARTINEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CORKY N. COMBS et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S121552. Supreme Court of California. May 20, 2010. As modified June 9, 2010. *41 Law Offices of Tala

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1250-12

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-16-00465-CR No. 07-16-00466-CR No. 07-16-00467-CR No. 07-16-00468-CR ALEXANDER ELI MARTINEZ, APPELLANT

Martinez v State of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 00108) Martinez v State of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 00108 Decided on January 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau p

Case Number: 03-08-00594-CV 06/24/2010 Case stored in record room 06/04/2010 Notice sent to Court of Appeals 04/23/2010 Petition for Review disposed proceeding denied 03/23/2010 Case forwarded to Court 03/16/2010 Response to Petition for Review waived 03/11/2010 Phone call from Clerk's Office 03/10/2010 Phone call from Clerk's Office 03/08/2010 Petition for Review filed 03/08/2010 Appendix Filed OPINION A number of current and former Austin f

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SURIE ALEXANDER, No. 22-55588 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:19-cv-01359- v. DSF-SP DAU V. NGUYEN, M.D., in his individual capacity, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal f

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS FOR PUBLICATION June 03, 2025

People v Martinez (2018 NY Slip Op 07329) People v Martinez 2018 NY Slip Op 07329 Decided on October 31, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

Appellate Case: 23-2193 Document: 60-1 Date Filed: 11/19/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 19, 2024 Christopher M. Wolpert

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Defendant Eric Alexander was convicted by a jury of one count of failing to register under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). Alexander now appeals. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we reverse his conviction due to an erroneous and prejudicial jury instruction and remand for further procee

ORDER Cresenciano Martinez-Garduno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the denial of a motion to continue his removal proceedings. Despite admitting his ineligibility for relief from a notice of removal, Martinez-Garduno sought the continuance in order to support his girlfriend as she recovered from gallbladder surgery. The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) determined that the girlfriend’s surgery was not “good cause” for

ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge Petitioner Roger Alexander appealed a final order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Doc. 33-2. The Ninth Circuit found that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding Petitioner’s nationality, and transferred the matter to this Court under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5)(B). Doc. 33. During a conference call with the Court,

GRAVES, Justice. This Court granted discretionary review to resolve the issues of whether an insurance policy’s exclusion of coverage for willful violation of a penal statute requires a criminal conviction of an insured in order for the exclusionary clause within the insurance policy to be invoked, even though the exclusion contains no such requirement. We hold that the provisions of the insurance policy do not require that th

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Alexander (2023 NY Slip Op 06030) HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Alexander 2023 NY Slip Op 06030 Decided on November 22, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Ju

21-3075(L) Alexander v. City of Syracuse In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 (Argued: October 2, 2023 Decided: March 14, 2025) Docket Nos. 21-3075(L), 22-103(C) * TROY ALEXANDER,