Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alexander J Pena”
Pena v. Statepublic domain
MORRIS, Judge. The petitioners, drivers appearing in county court for civil traffic infractions, seek certiorari review of a circuit court order denying their joint petition for writ of prohibition, which sought review of the county judge's denial of the petitioners' motions to disqualify the county judge from presiding over their traffic cases. The circuit court denied the petition for writ of prohibition, concluding that the motio
Pena v. Mukaseypublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Rafael Pena, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, seeks review of a February 27, 2007 order of the BIA denying Pena’s motion to remand and affirming the June 20, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Helen J. Sichel denying his application for cancellation of removal. In re Rafael Pena, No. A 75 792 098 (B.I.A. Feb. 27, 2007), aff'g No. A 75 792 098 (Immig. Ct. N.Y.
Pena ex rel. Estate of Cornell v. Givenspublic domain
PER CURIAM: * This case arises from George Cornell’s tragic death at a state-run psychiatric emergency room. His representative sued the doctors, nurses, and technicians who treated him and the hospital supervisors for violations of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The district court denied the defendants’ motions for summary judgment on the grounds of qualified immunity. The defendant
Martin v. J.C. Penney Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I. Introduction Plaintiffs Yavon Martin and Elizabeth Martinez assert claims against defendants J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“J.C. Penney”), Yesennia Bolanos, Kenneth Finger-man, John Pena, and David Rodriguez for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, New York State Human Rights Law, the New York City Administrative Code, and s
State v. Penapublic domain
[Cite as State v. Pena, 2020-Ohio-395.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 28156 : v. : Tri
United States v. Penapublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-2047 Document: 010111106405 Date Filed: 09/05/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 5, 2024
State v. Valenzuela-Penapublic domain
[Cite as State v. Valenzuela-Pena, 2019-Ohio-1701.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO MADISON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2018-07-023 Appellee, : OPINION 5/6/2019
Gui Hyun Na v. Penapublic domain
Gui Hyun Na v Pena (2019 NY Slip Op 02318) Gui Hyun Na v Pena 2019 NY Slip Op 02318 Decided on March 27, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
The People v. Robin Penapublic domain
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 45 The People &c., Appellant, v. Robin Pena, Respondent. Paul A. Andersen, for appellant. Morgan Everhart, for respondent. Order insofar as appealed from reversed, defendant’s motion to suppress denied and case remitted to C
In re: Alexander Sittenfeldpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0220p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: ALEXANDER SITTENFELD, aka P.G. Sittenfeld, │
YORLAN ESPINOSA PENA v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT YORLAN ESPINOSA PENA; WARNER B. ) BARRANTES; SARAH HAMADI; ROBERT ) L. GARCIA; RANDY MORENO; PETER W. ) RODINO; MIGUEL GUZMAN; MICHAEL R. ) MYZAK; MAXWELL S. GIVEN; MAX GE
Joshua Belcher v. Heleny Pena (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any FILED court except for the purpose of establishing Jul 17 2020, 8:51 am the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK estoppel, or the law of the case. Indiana Supreme Court
State of Tennessee v. Rubin P. Penapublic domain
10/08/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 18, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RUBIN P. PENA Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-74450 Royce Taylor, Judge No. M2017-01663-CCA-R3-CD The Def
MARY LEON v. EDWARD PENA and SORIS PARAJONpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MARY LEON, Appellant, v. EDWARD PENA and SORIS PARAJON, Appellees. No. 4D18-2071 [June 12, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
Opinion PENA, J.- When the juvenile court orders a legal guardianship for a child with visitation for the mother, and the child refuses to participate in visitation, may the court terminate dependency jurisdiction with knowledge that its visitation order will not be honored or enforceable? We conclude it may not do so absent a finding continued visitation wou
Pena v. Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc.public domain
ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. The plaintiffs, hourly workers, move for class certification against their current and former employers. Pis.’ Mot. Class Cert., ECF No. 56.1 Three defendants, Taylor Farms Pacific, Inc. (TFP), Abel Mendoza, Inc. (AMI), and SlingShot Connections, LLC (SlingShot), oppose their motion. Def. TFP’s Opp’n Class Cert. (TFP Opp’n), E
State Of Washington, V. Alejandro Pena Salvadorpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 81212-2-I ) Respondent, ) DIVISION ONE ) v. ) PUBLISHED OPINION ) ALEJANDRO PEÑA SALVADOR, )
Ex Parte Brayan Alexander Andrade Medrano A/K/A Brayan Alexander Andrade Madrano v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-23-00336-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG EX PARTE BRAYAN ALEXANDER ANDRADE MEDRANO A/K/A BRAYAN ALEXANDER ANDRADE MADRANO ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF MAVERICK COUNTY, TEXAS MEMORANDUM OPINION
MIGUEL PENA MONTES DE OCA AND PATRICIA OJEDA v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATIONpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-0860 Lower Tribunal No. 17-28717 ________________ Miguel Pena Montes de Oca and Patricia Ojeda, Appellants,
Alexander, Kelvin Grantpublic domain
WR-83,764-02 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/28/2015 5:06:20 AM Accepted 10/28/2015 8:07:09 AM