Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alexander Florez”
Florez v. Ginsbergpublic domain
No. 120,129 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS PANTALEON FLOREZ III, Appellant, v. RICK GINSBERG, SALLY ROBERTS, PAUL MARKHAM, and UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. W
People v. Florezpublic domain
RUSHING, P.J., Dissenting I. Introduction My esteemed colleagues join a number of courts in refusing to apply Penal Code section 1170.18, subdivision (c)(§-1170.18(c)), according to its plain meaning. To the best of my knowledge, only one of those decisions is currently citable. (People v. Esparza (2015)
People v. Florezpublic domain
Filed 3/14/16 Certified for Publication 3/25/16 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, H040327 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. C9890809) v. JOHN PAUL FLOREZ, Defen
ALEXANDER v. STATEpublic domain
ALEXANDER v. STATE Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us
United States v. Alexander Wallspublic domain
OPINION BEA, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Alexander Walls operated as a small-time pimp. The questions here are (1) whether, under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, Congress has the power to regulate his local pimping, and (2) whether Congress intended a federal criminal statute to regulate local pimping consistent with the <
Range v. Douglaspublic domain
*873 OPINION & ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 82.) Plaintiffs filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 83) and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. 90). Defendants also filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority in support of their M
United States v. Mohammad Al Sharaireipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2792 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Mohammad Al Sharairei Defen
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge This Freedom of Information Act litigation concerns a request by the American Civil Liberties Union for records pertaining to the United States Department of Justice’s policy on giving notice to criminal defendants and others against whom it intends to use evidence derived from war-rantless surveillance authorized by the FISA Amendme
195 P.3d 184 (2008) HIGHLAND VILLAGE PARTNERS, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BRADBURY & STAMM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a New Mexico corporation, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 07-0194. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. April 8, 2008. Review Denied September 23, 2008.
State v. Nihiserpublic domain
OPINION BRAMMER, Judge. Bart Nihiser was convicted of one count each of aggravated driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) and aggravated driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.10 or more while his license was suspended, revoked or in violation of a restriction, both class four felonies. A.R.S. §§ 28-692 and 28-697(A)(l). The trial court suspended Nihiser’s sentence and p
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Gregory H. Woods, United States District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is the second round of cross-motions for summary judgment in this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) dispute between the American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”) and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) that began with a March 29, 2013 request for records from DOJ per
Mohankumar v. Dunnpublic domain
59 F.Supp.2d 1123 (1999) P.S. MOHANKUMAR, Plaintiff, v. Jon D. DUNN, individually and in his official capacity; and Kansas State University, Defendants. No. 97-1555-WEB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 13, 1999. *1124 Pantaleon Florez, Jr., Florez & Frost, P.A., Topeka, KS, for plaintiff. Eliehue Brunson,
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, district Judge: Plaintiffs Charlie Savage and the New York Times Company (collectively “the Times”) filed this action against Defendant the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ” or “the' Government”) .under ,;the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”). The Times seeks disclosure of five memoranda related to DOJ’s investigation into whether certain overse
United States v. Sampsonpublic domain
Debra Ann Livingston, Circuit Judge: From 1997 to 2015, John Sampson ("Sampson") served as a member of the New York State Senate, representing the 19th Senate District in Brooklyn. Sampson also served as a referee in foreclosure actions for properties located in Kings County, Brooklyn. By 2013, Sampson had purportedly embezzled approximately $440,000 from escrow accounts that he oversaw
United States v. Youngpublic domain
609 F.3d 348 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darnell Anthony YOUNG, a/k/a DJ Nelly Nell, a/k/a Nelly, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darnell Anthony Young, a/k/a DJ Nelly Nell, a/k/a Nelly, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 08-4117, 08-4118. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued May 11, 2010.
State v. Melendezpublic domain
REISNER, P.J.A.D. *453Based on overwhelming evidence gathered during the execution of a search *289warrant, a jury convicted defendant Luis Melendez of multiple drug and weapons offenses.1 After merger, the trial court
Guliford v. Beech Aircraft Corp.public domain
768 F.Supp. 313 (1991) Dorothy M. GULIFORD, Plaintiff, v. BEECH AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 90-1013 C. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 23, 1991. *314 Pantaleon Florez, Jr., Topeka, Kan., for plaintiff. Larry B. Spikes and Kathryn Gardner, Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Swartz, Wichita, Kan.,
Craig v. Craig (In Re Craig)public domain
196 B.R. 305 (1996) In re Gregory O'Brien CRAIG, Debtor. Shirley Annette CRAIG, Plaintiff, v. Gregory O'Brien CRAIG, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 95-31771-T. Adversary No. 95-3093-T. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. April 1, 1996. *306 *307 Rose McC. Alexander
650 F.Supp.2d 314 (2009) COMPANIA EMBOTELLADORA DEL PACIFICO, S.A., Plaintiff, v. PEPSI COLA CO., Defendant. No. 00 Civ. 7677(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 8, 2009. *317 Daniel J. Fetterman, Trevor J. Welch, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, Olga Lucia Fuentes, Gibson, Dunn & Crutche
Diana Cantu-Guerrero v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2036 IN RE: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS CHINESE-MANUFACTURED FLOORING PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (1:15-md-02627-AJT-TRJ) IN RE: LUMBER LIQUIDATORS CHINESE-MANUFACTURED FLOORING DURABILITY MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION (1:16- md-0