Cases

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–100 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 23, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque

Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 153 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-24-749 Opinion Delivered March 4, 2026 ALEXANDER OBERLANDER APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 23CV-23-208] V.

Cite as 2026 Ark. App. 228 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-24-749 Opinion Delivered April 8, 2026 ALEXANDER OBERLANDER APPEAL FROM THE FAULKNER APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 23CV-23-208] V.

WINTER, Circuit Judge. Semyon Bumagin appeals from his conviction and sentence after pleading guilty before Judge Wood. Bumagin was involved in a scheme to defraud a jeweler and pled guilty to conspiring to possess and pass a counterfeit instrument to defraud a jeweler, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 513(a), 514(a)(2) and to passing or attempting to pass a fictitious obligation

**************************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of this opinion is the date the opinion was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. This opinion is subject to revisions and editorial changes, not of a substantive nature, and corrections of a tech

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

July 4, 2023 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 347 Conn. 101 JULY, 2023 101 Direct Energy Services, LLC v. Public Utilities Regulatory Authority DIRECT ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY (SC 20643) Robi

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2018 ME 58 Docket: SRP-17-22 Argued: October 11, 2017 Decided: April 26, 2018 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ. Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ. Concurrence: ALEXANDER, J. STATE OF MAINE

240 Argued and submitted September 3, 2020, affirmed July 14, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. AARON SCOTT ALTABEF, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 13C41985; A169768 493 P3d 1099 Defendant appeals from a judgm

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

STEWART, J. | plaintiffs, Guindolyn and Dale Hopper (“the Hoppers”), sued the defendant, Ven-ator Contracting Group, L.L.C. (“Venator”), under the thedry of vicarious liability for damages stemming from an automobile accident. The Hoppers alleged that Wayne Austin (“Austin”) was a Venator employee in the course and scope of his employment when he caused the accident that injured Mrs. Hopper. The trial court granted a summary j

568 December 20, 2023 No. 663 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON BRIDGE CREEK RANCH, LLC, Relator-Respondent, v. OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT and Doug Woodcock, Director of Oregon Water Resources Department, Defendants-Appellants. Marion County Circuit Court 22CV05598

No. 816 September 17, 2025 445 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON Nicholas LOPER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lindsay BRAKEL, Defendant-Appellant, and PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION, INC. et al., Defendants. Multnomah County Circuit Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐1738 ALI GADELHAK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. AT&T SERVICES, INC., Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the Un

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. A federal grand jury sitting in Chicago issued a subpoena to an unnamed Illinois lawyer (we’ll give him a fake name — Tom Hagen — in this opinion). The subpoena ordered Hagen to testify and produce documents and records identifying all “individuals, companies, corporations or any other entities (including, but not limited to, All Games

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐1738 ALI GADELHAK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. AT&T SERVICES, INC., Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the Un

Judge Rosemary Ledet I iThis is a mass tort, toxic exposure case. This is the second time this case has come before this court on appeal. The previous appeal was from the trial court’s December 15, 2011 judgment certifying a plaintiff class. Guidry v. Dow Chem. Co., 12-0436, 12-0198 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/14/12), 105 So.3d 900 (“Guidry I”), writ granted in part, Guidry v. Dow Chem. Co., 12-2696 (La. 3/1/13), 10

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐1738 ALI GADELHAK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. AT&T SERVICES, INC., Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the Un

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1078 REFUGIO RUIZ-CORTEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

USCA11 Case: 19-12745 Document: 68-1 Date Filed: 05/03/2023 Page: 1 of 49 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-12745 ____________________ INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 947,