Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alex Varga”
Vargas v. New York City Employees' Retirement Systempublic domain
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of the New York City Employees’ Retirement System dated December 11, 2009, which denied the petitioner’s application for accidental disability *1346retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 605-b, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothe
Vargas v. New York City Employees' Retirement Systempublic domain
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of the New York City Employees’ Retirement System dated December 11, 2009, which denied the petitioner’s application for accidental disability *1346retirement benefits pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 605-b, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothe
Julius Evans v. Alex Jonespublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-3466 JULIUS EVANS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. ALEX JONES, Respondent-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Alex Molina v. Statepublic domain
OPINION KEN AVISE, Justice. Appellant Alex Molina was convicted by a jury of capital murder and sentenced to confinement for life in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred by failing to suppress a portion of his recorded statement, submitting an erroneous charge, denying con
United States v. Alex Campbellpublic domain
TINDER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Alex Campbell, also known as “Daddy”, “Dave” and “Cowboy”, recruited young women in the United States illegally to work for him as masseuses and, ultimately, prostitutes. He referred to these women as his “Family”. At first, Campbell enticed the women into joining his Family by offering them comfortable places to live, and jobs in massa
Santa Fuel, Inc. v. Vargapublic domain
Opinion WEST, J. In this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed by the plaintiff, Santa Fuel, Inc., the defendants1 appeal from the orders of the trial court denying their motions to discharge the hen.2 On appeal, the defendants claim that the court, Brennan, J., improperly denied their amended motion to discharge the hen, concluding that
United States v. Vargas-Ochoapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Alfredo Vargas-Ochoa appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 33-month sen*841tence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Vargas-Ochoa’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI ALEX CARRASQUILLO Apelación, VILLANUEVA procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Apelante Superior de Carolina v. TA2026AP00269 Caso Núm.:
Sosa v. Local Staff, LLCpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Edgar Sosa appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Buchwald, J.) dismissing his claims of race-based discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation against various people and entities associated with his former employer under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VIP), 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the New York City Human Rights Law, New York City Administrative Code, § 8-101 (the “NYCHRL”
Martins, Alex Sander v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-99-00638-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ ALEX SANDER MARTINS , Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee. _______________________
Pueblo v. Álvarez Vargaspublic domain
El Juez Presidente Señor Hernández Denton emitió la opinión del Tribunal. El recurso de epígrafe nos brinda la oportunidad de de-finir, por primera vez, los contornos del concurso real de delitos, figura regulada actualmente por el Art. 79 del Có-digo Penal de 2004 (33 L.P.R.A. see. 4707). En específico, debemos precisar en qué supuestos procede imponer la pena agregada que provee la citada disposición.
Galea'i v. Tuikapublic domain
ORDER DENYING RECUSAL REQUEST On July 6, 2004, Defendants Tuika Tuika (“Tuika”) and Mafa Tuika (“Mafa”) (together “the Tuikas”) requested Associate Justice Lyle L. Richmond, the Justice presiding, to recuse himself from this matter, on *100the grounds that the Tuikas cannot receive a fair trial before him in this action. Tuika’s affidavit, attached to the July 6 motion, asserte
Cervantes v. Health Plan of Nevada, Inc.public domain
263 P.3d 261 (2011) Margerita CERVANTES and Jaime Rodriguez, Appellants, v. HEALTH PLAN OF NEVADA, INC.; Sierra Health Services, Inc.; Sierra Health and Life Insurance Company, Inc.; Sierra Health-Care Options, Inc.; and Prime Health, Respondents. No. 56166. Supreme Court of Nevada. October 27, 2011. *263 Matthew L. Sharp Ltd. an
Alvarado-Vargas v. 6422 Holding Corp.public domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant 6422 Holding Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated October 22, 2010, which, inter alia, granted the motion of nonparty Marshall, Conway, Wright & Bradley, EC., pursuant to CFLR 321 (b) (2) for leave to withdraw as counsel of record for the defendant Forthright Construction, Inc. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar
PACIFICARE OF NEVADA, INC. v. Rogerspublic domain
266 P.3d 596 (2011) PACIFICARE OF NEVADA, INC.; Pacificare Life And Health Insurance Company; Pacificare Life Assurance Company; and United Healthcare Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Dorothy ROGERS, Respondent. No. 55713. Supreme Court of Nevada. October 27, 2011. *597 Jones Vargas and Constance L. Akridge and Matthew T. Milone
Pueblo v. Acevedo Ramospublic domain
El Juez Asociado Señor Rebollo López emitió la opinión del Tribunal. El 1 de junio de 2006, luego de una alegación de culpa-bilidad, George Acevedo Ramos fue sentenciado a tres años en libertad a prueba por una . infracción al Art. 404 de la Ley de Sustancias Controladas de Puerto Rico (Ley de Sus-tancias Controladas), Ley Núm. 4 de 23 de junio de 1971 (24 L.P.R.A. see. 2404). Entre las condiciones impuestas al
Pueblo v. Rodríguez Vicentepublic domain
per. curiam: Nos enfrentamos, nuevamente, a una pre-ocupante y recurrente situación a la cual no deberíamos *295confrontamos con tanta frecuencia, esto es, una actuación del Tribunal de Apelaciones que no solamente es errónea, sino que es claramente contraria a la reiterada jurispru-dencia de este Tribunal. HH El Jurado que i
Bruce v. K.K.B., Inc.public domain
52 S.W.3d 250 (2001) Richard Eugene BRUCE and Michael James Vargas, Appellants, v. K.K.B., INC. d/b/a Seafood & Spaghetti Works, Appellee. No. 13-99-455-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. June 7, 2001. Rehearing Overruled August 23, 2001. *252 Nadine Melissa Nieto, Law Offices of Ronald A. Ramos,
Opinion by Judge GOODWIN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RYMER. ORDER The request for publication is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed August 8, 1997 is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Goodwin. OPINION GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Alex V. Stein appeals his sentence for violation of-18 U.S.C. § 1341, mail fraud, 18
Michulena v. Attorney General of the United Statespublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. Margarita Michulena, a citizen of Latvia, was admitted to the United States on October 22, 1998, as a non-immigrant student. She overstayed her admission period and was charged with removability pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) § 237(a)(1)(B) [8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B) ]. Michulena conceded re-movability but applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the U