Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alejandro Acosta”
Becker v. State COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JESUS DELGADO SAUCEDO, Appellant, v. ALEJANDRO ACOSTA HORNER, A/K/A ALEJANDRO ACOSTA, LAURA ACOSTA, CAROLYN RABE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TH
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § JESUS DELGADO SAUCEDO, § Appellant, § No. 08-08-00340-CV v. § Appeal from ALEJAND
David Alejandro Flores Acosta v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-10-00598-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG DAVID ALEJANDRO FLORES ACOSTA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hi
United States v. Acosta-Leonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Acosta-Leon appeals from the 46 month sentence imposed following his guilty to plea to illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, enhanced by 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. We disagree that because Acosta-Leon pleaded guilty in the early stages of the proceeding against him, the failur
United States v. Acosta-Leonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Alejandro Acosta-Leon appeals from the 46 month sentence imposed following his guilty to plea to illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, enhanced by 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. We disagree that because Acosta-Leon pleaded guilty in the early stages of the proceeding against him, the failur
Acosta-Ramirez v. Statepublic domain
Review Denied
People v. Alejandropublic domain
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered November 28, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 23 years to life, unanimously affirmed. Defendant’s challenge to the court’s jury instruction concerning the requirement of unanimity is unpreserved. We do not find any mode-of-proceedings error ex
United States v. Alejandro Valenciapublic domain
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Alejandro Valencia and Eric Octavio Rangel-Ortega pleaded guilty to several drug-related offenses. The district court 2 sentenced Valencia to 292 months’ imprisonment and Rangel-Ortega to 240 months’ imprisonment. Both Valencia and Rangel-Ortega now appeal, arguing that the district court erre
United States v. Acosta Valdezpublic domain
84 F.Supp.2d 237 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Alejandro ACOSTA VALDEZ, Luis Cava Pichardo, and Meraldo Polanco, Defendants. No. CRIM. 98-105(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 26, 1999. Jorge E. Vega-Pacheco, Antonio R. Bazán, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Rafael F. Castro-Lang, Irma R. Valdejulli-Pérez, Fernando J. Car
Valdez-Acosta v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 442 Fed. Appx. 155.
United States v. Acostapublic domain
807 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Juan Manuel ACOSTA, Martin Arreola-Romero, Angel Luis Ayala, Otha Barnes, Gerald Edward Durrance, Martina Casas Flores, Ramiro Hernandez-Duque, Jorge Lucatero-Torres, Belisario Gil Mendoza, Juan Manuel Mendoza, Raphael Pedroza Perez, Obiel Pineda-Pardo, Alfonso Rios, Jr., Jose Cesar Almeida, Jorge Alejandro Anaya-Medina, Luis Manuel Haces-Delgado, Alejandro De La Cruz-Plancarte, Javier De La
United States v. Acostapublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. In November 2000, defendant-appellant Alejandro Perez pled guilty, in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, to one count of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute at least five kilograms of cocaine and at leas
Saucedo v. Hornerpublic domain
329 S.W.3d 825 (2010) Jesus Delgado SAUCEDO, Appellant, v. Alejandro Acosta HORNER, a/k/a Alejandro Acosta, Laura Acosta, Carolyn Rabe, Individually and as the Administratrix of the Estate of Carlyle J. Rabe, Jr., Appellees. No. 08-08-00340-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. August 31, 2010. *827 Colbert Coldwell, Guevara, R
United States v. Acosta Martinezpublic domain
106 F.Supp.2d 311 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. [1] Hector Oscar ACOSTA MARTINEZ, [2] Joel Rivera Alejandro, Defendants. No. Crim.99-044 SEC. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 17, 2000. Guillermo Gil, U.S. Attorney, John R. Teakell, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of P.R., San Juan, PR, for plaintiff. M. Cristina Gutierrez,
Gilbert v. City of El Pasopublic domain
OPINION Appellant, Mr. Ray E. Gilbert, Jr. ("Mr. Gilbert") appeals the trial court's grant of the City of El Paso ("the City") and El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board's ("the PSB") motion for summary judgment, the denial of his motion for summary judgment, and the court's entering a declaratory judgment in favor of the City and the Board. Mr. Gilbert is a resident of El Paso County, Texas, and a "user" under Section 402.044(9)
United States v. Acosta-Martinezpublic domain
265 F.Supp.2d 181 (2003) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. Hector Oscar ACOSTA-MARTINEZ, Joel Rivera-Alejandro Defendants. No. CIV. 99-044(HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 23, 2003. *182 Hector A. Deliz, Deliz & Torres Gonzalez, Hato Rey, PR, William D. Matthewman, Miami, FL, Rafael F. Castro-Lang,
United States v. Acosta-Martinezpublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This case raises the question of the applicability of the death penalty to defendants charged with certain federal crimes in the United States Courts in Puerto Rico. Hector Oscar Acosta Martinez and Joel Rivera Alejandro were indicted for several federal crimes. Count One charged conspiracy to interfere with interstate commerce by exto
Acosta v. Puerto Rico Department of Healthpublic domain
PER CURIAM. This appeal was taken from a refusal of the district court to stay discovery pending its decision on certain dispositive motions. The district court decided those motions on March 31, 2004. This appeal is, therefore, moot. 1 See CMM Cable Rep., Inc. v. Ocean Coast Props., Inc., 48 F.3d 618, 621
Sentry Select Insurance Co. v. Lopezpublic domain
ORDER KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff Sentry Select Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Duty to Indemnify (“Motion”), ECF No. 78, in the above-captioned case. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND The basic factual contours of this case, including the facts surro
United States v. Acosta Martinezpublic domain
89 F.Supp.2d 173 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. [1] Hector Oscar ACOSTA MARTINEZ, [2] Joel Rivera Alejandro, Defendants. No. CR. 99-044(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 10, 2000. *174 John R. Teakell, Guillermo Gil, U.S. Attorney's Office District of P.R., Criminal Division, San Juan, PR,