⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Alcorn v. Excel Finance Co.”

Alcorn v. Moorepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965-01-22 · Published · cited 3× · 386 S.W.2d 907; 1965 Mo. App. LEXIS 718
386 S.W.2d 907 (1965) Dale ALCORN and Delmar Alcorn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Handy MOORE and Bill Moore, Defendants-Respondents. No. 8365. Springfield Court of Appeals, Missouri. January 22, 1965. *908 Dwight Crader, Sikeston, for plaintiffs-appellants. Manuel Drumm, Sikeston, for defendants-respondents. STONE, Ju
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-05-08 · Published · cited 5× · 957 F. Supp. 2d 316; 2013 WL 1890278; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65882
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. This case is about whether a corporation made, or missed, the deadline to exercise its right to redeem its outstanding notes early, on highly favorable terms. On March 15, 2013, plaintiff Chesapeake Energy Corporation (“Chesapeake”) issued a notice to redeem approximately $1.3 billion in notes due in 2019 that it had issued in 2012. Chesapeak
District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998-07-09 · Published · cited 15× · 30 F. Supp. 2d 226; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18933; 1998 WL 848001
30 F.Supp.2d 226 (1998) OMEGA ENGINEERING, INC. v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY. No. 5:90 CV 554(JGM). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 9, 1998. *227 *228 *229 *230 *231
District Court, E.D. New York · 1989-04-14 · Published · cited 69× · 710 F. Supp. 1407; 1989 WL 39003
710 F.Supp. 1407 (1989) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, a municipal corporation, Robert Alcorn, Christopher S. George, Fred Harrison, Peter Maniscalco, William P. Quinn, and Custom Extruders, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, Stone & Webster Engineering Company, Charles R. Pierce, Wilfred O. Uhl, Charles J. Davis, and Andrew W. Wofford, Defendants. No. 87-CV-646 (JBW). United States District Co
Connecticut Superior Court · 1947-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 14 Conn. Super. Ct. 432; 14 Conn. Supp. 432; 1947 Conn. Super. LEXIS 8
Two appeals from probate involving the same estate have been tried together and the issues thus presented are embraced in this single opinion. Marcus Morton Kimball, late of Pomfret, Connecticut died on October 17, 1939, leaving a will naming the New England Trust Company, hereinafter referred to as the trust company, as executor and trustee. His will, after making certain specific bequests, left all of the rest, residue, and remainder of his property to the trust company in trust to p
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946-07-16 · Published · cited 4× · 156 F.2d 474; 70 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 282; 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3280
MINTON, Circuit Judge. The defendants appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff which enjoined them from adopting and using the name General Industries Corporation. The plaintiff, incorporated in Ohio in 1914, first adopted the name, The General Industries Company, in 1925. During World War II it manufactured largely military equipment. Before the wa
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1937-05-31 · Published · cited 12× · 174 So. 802; 179 Miss. 282; 1937 Miss. LEXIS 24
On May 20, 1935, the Greenville Bank Trust Company filed a bill of complaint against J.T. McCain and William M. McCain, a partnership trading as J.T. McCain Son; H.B. Crosby; the Bank of Commerce; the Bank of Greenwood; the Holmes County Bank Trust Company; J.I. Lundy; W.G. Humphrey, and J.H. Lear. The bill of complaint alleged, in substance, that the Greenville Bank Trust Company loaned to the defendants J.T. McCain Son the sum of $2,681.30, evidenced by their promissory note, in
District Court, D. Maryland · 2017-11-08 · Published · cited 4× · 295 F. Supp. 3d 540
Catherine C. Blake, United States District Judge *546TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...546 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...547 III. PRELIMINARY ISSUES...549 A. Standing...549 B. Defendants' Daubert Motion...550 1. Standard
Saunders v. Brinerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019-12-17 · Published · cited 12× · 334 Conn. 135
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
District Court, District of Columbia · 2004-12-09 · Published · cited 4× · 319 B.R. 290; 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 2177; 2004 WL 3130543
319 B.R. 290 (2004) In re NETTEL CORPORATION, INC., et al., Debtors. Wendell W. Webster, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Harris Corporation, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-01771. Adversary No. 02-10128. United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia. December 9, 2004. *292 Linda M. Correia, Jonathan C. Puth, Washington, DC, for pl
California Court of Appeal · 2009-10-29 · Published · cited 114× · 178 Cal. App. 4th 1020; 100 Cal. Rptr. 3d 875; 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1740
178 Cal.App.4th 1020 (2009) BERG & BERG ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOHN BOYLE et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. H031591. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. October 29, 2009. *1024 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Robert R. Moore, Michael J. Betz and Kevin Ryan for Plaintiff
People v. Worthypublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1980-08-21 · Published · cited 33× · 109 Cal. App. 3d 514; 167 Cal. Rptr. 402; 1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2182
109 Cal.App.3d 514 (1980) 167 Cal. Rptr. 402 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES CLENTON WORTHY, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 35582. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. August 21, 1980. *517 COUNSEL Ron W. Alcorn, under appointment by the Court of Appeal
Mississippi Supreme Court · 1970-03-09 · Published · cited 0× · 232 So. 2d 716; 1970 Miss. LEXIS 1638
This is an appeal from the Chancery Court of Alcorn County, Mississippi, wherein a decree was entered disallowing the claim of Johnson Motors, Inc. against the Estate of Susan Hathcock Jones, Deceased. The claim, based on a conditional sales contract for the purchase of a 1967 Oldsmobile, was made while Susan Hathcock Jones was a minor, eighteen years of age, and was disaffirmed by her administrator after her death. From this decree an appeal is taken. On April 5, 1967, Susan H
Connecticut Superior Court · 1981-03-30 · Published · cited 20× · 434 A.2d 962; 37 Conn. Super. Ct. 50; 37 Conn. Supp. 50; 1981 Conn. Super. LEXIS 176
The plaintiffs in this action, hereinafter referred to as Kidde-Briscoe, formed a joint venture consisting of two large construction contractors who combined to bid for the construction of the state hospital and outpatient clinic buildings which together with the medical and dental schools comprise the Connecticut health center located in Farmington. Kidde-Brisco submitted the only bid for the construction of the hospital and outpatient buildings of the complex and on January 7, 1969 was awar
Sheff v. O'Neillpublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996-07-09 · Published · cited 98× · 238 Conn. 1; 678 A.2d 1267; 1996 Conn. LEXIS 239
PETERS, C. J. The public elementary and high school students in Hartford suffer daily from the devastating effects that racial and ethnic isolation, as well as poverty, have had on their education. Federal constitutional law provides no remedy for their plight. The principal issue in this appeal is whether, under the unique provisions of our state constitution, the state, which already plays an active role in managin
California Supreme Court · 1988-12-29 · Published · cited 955× · 765 P.2d 373; 47 Cal. 3d 654; 254 Cal. Rptr. 211; 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1729; 1988 Cal. LEXIS 269
47 Cal.3d 654 (1988) 765 P.2d 373 254 Cal. Rptr. 211 DANIEL D. FOLEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. L.A. 32148. Supreme Court of California. December 29, 1988. *661 COUNSEL Gilbert & Sackman, Gilbert, Cooke
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995-09-25 · Published · cited 10× · 900 F. Supp. 272; 1995 WL 574295
900 F.Supp. 272 (1995) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alease Sims, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. The STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. CV 83-M-1676. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. August 1, 1995. Order Granting in Part Motions to Alter or
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008-11-03 · Published · cited 16× · 584 F. Supp. 2d 395; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94410; 2008 WL 4786658
(2008) In re TJX COMPANIES RETAIL SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 07-10162-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 3, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG, District Judge. On January 17, 2007, TJX Companies, Inc. ("TJX") publicly announced that hackers had compromised its computer systems. See Joseph Perei
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991-12-30 · Published · cited 26× · 787 F. Supp. 1030; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19151; 1991 WL 286238
787 F.Supp. 1030 (1991) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alma S. Freeman, John T. Gibson, Susan Buskey, Carl Petty, Dennis Charles Barnett by his father Arthur D. Barnett, Vonda Cross, Tammi Palmer, Alease S. Sims, Stacey Levise Sims by her parents Levi Sims and Alease S. Sims, Gary Mitchell, Jr., Grover L. Brown, Frederick Carodine, Frankie Patricia Yarbrough, Dr. Charles Edwards McMillan, Horace W. Rice, Anthony Y. Lavonne Thompson by his mother Lois N. Thompson,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975-01-02 · Published · cited 48× · 505 F.2d 1091
505 F.2d 1091 75-1 USTC P 9340 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Edward J. BARRETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 73-1477. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued Jan. 7, 1974.Decided Nov. 8, 1974, Rehearing En Banc Denied Dec. 26,1974, Rehearing DeniedJan. 2, 1975.