Cases

RICH, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from the August 28, 1985, decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 623 F.Supp. 1344, 227 USPQ 215, in favor of defendant Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc. (Monoclonal) holding that all 29 claims of plaintiff’s patent No. 4,376,110 entitled “Immunometric Ass

BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the district court for abusing its discretion in allowing the defendant in an infringement suit to amend its pleadings to include the defense of patent misuse and a counterclaim for antitrust violations where the motion to do so was not filed until 7 months after a jury verdict agains

778 F.Supp.2d 762 (2011) Bruce N. SAFFRAN, M.D., Ph.D., Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON and Cordis Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-451 (TJW). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. March 31, 2011. *763 Eric M. Albritton, Debra Rochelle Coleman, Albritton Law Firm, Longview, TX, Kenneth

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY,  Petitioner, v.  No. 06-71891 NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent.  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF  CALIFORNIA EX REL. BILL LOCKYER, ATTOR

DAVIS, Circuit Judge. King Instrument Corporation (King), the plaintiff below, charged Otari Corporation (Otari) with infringement of its U.S. Patent Nos. 3,637,153 (’153) issued January 25, 1972, and 3,737,358 (’358) issued June 5, 1973. King now appeals from final judgment by the United States District Court for the Northern Distr

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY,  Petitioner, v.  No. 06-71891 NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent.  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF  CALIFORNIA EX REL. BILL LOCKYER, ATTOR