Cases

i , The Attorney General of Texas Demsber 19. 1985 JIM MATTOX Attorney General Supreme Court Euildlng HonorableDaua Krlich OpinionNo. J-M-395 P. 0. BOX 12548 Austin, TX. 78711.254S LipscombCounty Attmmuey 512l4752501 P. 0. Box 156 Re: Whether a justice of the peace Telex 910/874-1387 Poll&t, Texas 79034

124 F.Supp.2d 948 (2000) Joyce A. WASHINGTON Plaintiff, v. GEORGE G. SHARP, INC., Defendants. No. CIV. A. 2:00-CV-374. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. December 20, 2000. *949 Jeffrey A. Vogelman, Thomas, Ballenger, Vogelman & Turner, Alexandria, VA, Joe C. Ashworth, Leonardtown, MD, for Plaintif

. . The Attorney General of Texas September 19, 1983 JIM MATTOX Attorney General Supreme Court Building Honorable Dana Ehrlich opinion No. 34-72 P. 0. Box 12546 Lipscomb County Attorney Austin, TX. 76711. 2546 P. 0. Box 156

DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶ 139. (concurring). The court is confronted with three separate but overlap- *101ping cases related to a John Doe investigation involving [- -], and a substantial number of organizations and individuals who are associates and political allies of [- -]. ¶ 140. This is the second John Do

7 Cal.App.2d 600 (1935) THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. DWIGHT WILLIAMS, Appellant. Crim. No. 2686. California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division One. June 14, 1935. Robert B. Agins and A. Edward Nichols for Appellant. U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Alberta Belford, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent. Roth, J., pro tem. <

The defendant, Mike Puppilo, was charged in an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County, in each of two counts with a violation of section 2 of the so-called "Gun Law," being an act of the legislature adopted in 1923 (Act 1970, p. 662, Deering's Gen. Laws 1923). The portion of the section material to our discussion reads as follows: *Page 560 "On and after the date upon which this act takes effect no unnaturalized, foreign b

453 U.S. 609 (1981) COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. ET AL. v. MONTANA ET AL. No. 80-581. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 30, 1981. Decided July 2, 1981. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA. *611 William P. Rogers argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were William R. Glendon,

2015 WI 85 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W & 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin ex rel. Two Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Gregory A. Peterson, John Doe Judge and Francis D.

2015 WI 85 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W & 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin ex rel. Two Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Gregory A. Peterson, John Doe Judge and Francis D.

Hatch, J. (dissenting): I am unable to concur in the prevailing opinion in this case. It is conceded that the rule in England, under its Statute of Wills, within the evidence herein, would have established the factum of will No. '2, which, it is claimed would have revoked will No. 1, had it been propounded for probate. - This seems to be established under authoritative decisions by the English courts in two recen

NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th

Sterrett, Judge: Petitioner, the Church of Scientology of California (California Church or Church), was incorporated as a nonprofit corporation in the State of California in 1954. In 1957, respondent recognized petitioner as an organization described in section 501(c)(3)1 exempt from Federal income taxes under section 501(a). In 1967, respondent revoked petitioner’s tax-exempt