Cases

MEMORANDUM** Alberta Rose Jones appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Monterey *225County Superior Court Judge Michael Fields, the City of Pacific Grove, and various local officials, alleging that her due process rights were violated in the course of animal abatement proceedings. We have jurisdictio

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2021-1580 ____________ ALBERTA S. ELLISON, Petitioner, vs. RANDY WILLOUGHBY, Respondent. November 2, 2023 MUÑIZ, C.J. This case presents a certified question about whether a personal injury

[Cite as State v. Fields, 2021-Ohio-1880.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109664 v. : DAVID FIELDS, :

683 F.Supp. 1398 (1988) ALBERTA PORK PRODUCERS' MARKETING BOARD, et al., Plaintiffs, The Canadian Meat Council, and its Members, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, National Pork Producers Council and Wilson Foods Corporation, Defendants-Intervenors. Court No. 85-09-01257. United States Court of International Trade. March 22, 1988.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge. This case is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 15] filed by Defendants 1556311 Alberta Ltd. f/k/a SureTech Tool Services, Inc. (“1556311”), SureTech Completions (USA) Inc., Sure-Tech Completions Canada Ltd., Sanjel Corporation, Sanjel (USA) Inc., and Sean Campbell. Defendants seeks dismissal of the First Amended Complaint [Doc.

722 F.Supp.2d 1 (2009) UNIQUE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. 965207 ALBERTA LTD., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-1095 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 22, 2009. *3 Quentin Rick Corrie, Birch Steward Kolasch & Birch, LLP, Falls Church, VA, Gerald F. Dunne, Law Office of Gerald F. Dunne, P.C., Ne

LOTTINGER, Judge. This is a suit in tort filed by Mary Jane ■Cornelius for the death of her husband resulting from an automobile accident. The defendant originally was Mrs. Alberta Fields, however, she has since passed away and her Succession has been substituted. The Audubon Insurance Company has been brought into the matter as a third-party •defendant. The Lower Court awarded judgment in favor of petitioner and against the

KING, Circuit Judge: Petitioner-Appellant Sherman Lamont Fields was convicted of murder in a- jury trial in federal district court and sentenced to death. We affirmed his conviction and *450 sentence on direct appeal. Fields unsuccessfully sought habeas relief in the district court on numerous groun

Case: 13-70025 Document: 00512753302 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/02/2014 REVISED September 2, 2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 30, 2014

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT JANE DOE, BY AND THROUGH ) HER NEXT FRIEND, JANE DOE GMA, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) WD79064 ) ALBERTA HUGHES, ) Opinion file

669 F.Supp. 445 (1987) ALBERTA PORK PRODUCERS' MARKETING BOARD, et al., Plaintiffs, The Canadian Meat Council, and Its Members, Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, National Pork Producers Council and Wilson Foods Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors. Court No. 85-09-01257. United States Court of International Trade. August 7, 1987.

OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. In this antitrust suit a methanol producer challenges a competitor’s acquisition of another corporation. The merger led to cancellation of the acquired company's plans to produce methanol by a new process, preceded by large scale purchases to stimulate the market before beginning production. We conclude that the plaintiffs’ alleged loss of anticipated sales res

JUDGMENT This case was considered on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs of the parties. See Fed. R.App. R. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions for review are denied. We review orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under the Administrative Procedure Act’s arbitrary and capricious standard a

JUDGMENT This case was considered on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs of the parties. See Fed. R.App. R. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions for review are denied. We review orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission under the Administrative Procedure Act’s arbitrary and capricious standard a

CROW, Chief Judge. On October 29, 1985, Ezell Goodwin and his wife, Alberta M. Goodwin, henceforth referred to as “petitioners,” filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Cedar County seek*772ing to adopt Vanessa Renee Kolman (“Vanessa”), born September 8, 1976, the daughter of Mary Louise Kolman (“Mary”) and Allan Duane Kolman (“Allan”). Inasmuch as

FEINBERG,'Chief Judge: This appeal raises unusual issues regarding the power of an administrative agency to insure the integrity of proceedings before it. Alberta Gas Chemicals, Ltd. (Alberta), a Canadian corporation, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Abraham D. Sofaer,

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS 2, 3, AND 4 ROBERT J. FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge. In this adversary proceeding, the chapter 7 trustee of a company that operated a Ponzi scheme seeks to recover money transferred to the defendants. The plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment on December 9, 2011. Numerous defendants opposed the motion.

873 F.Supp. 167 (1994) Frederick L. PITCHFORD and Alberta Pitchford, Plaintiffs, v. Hazel KITCHENS, Individually and as Postmaster of Earle, Arkansas; Dean Buchanan, Individually and as Division Manager/Postmaster, Memphis Division, United States Postal Service; J.F. Thomas, Individually and as District Manager, Mid-South District, United States Postal Service; and, Preston R. Tisch, Individually and as Postmaster General, United States Postal Se

ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. Before the Court are The Lirette Family’s Motion for Summary Judgment1 filed by Vaughan Andrew Lirette, Jr., Kenneth W. Lirette, Trade Lirette Dolan, Stephen J. Lirette, Janelle Marie Lirette, and David P. Lirette (collectively, the “Lirette Family”) and Castex’s Motion for Summary Judgment2</

HUFF, J. Respectfully, I dissent. Alberta Major brought this tort action against the City of Hartsville (City), alleging she was injured when she fell in a “hole” on City’s premises. The trial court granted City summary judgment, finding City was not on notice of any defect, rut, or depression at the location of the incident. In my opinion, the majority, as well as the trial court, has effectively applied an actual notice sta