Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-0449 Filed October 30, 2024 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. STEVEN EUGENE KROLL, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Monona County, Tod Deck, Judge. A defendant appeals his convictions for sex offenses against minors. CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED,

PER CURIAM: This case is before the Court upon the appeal of Elizabeth Dawn Thornton (hereinafter referred to as “Appellant”) from the *452August 17, 2009,1 final order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia, in which she was sentenced to an indeterminate sentence of three to 15 years in the state penitentiary for her convic

253 S.C. 209 (1969) 169 S.E.2d 617 Cecil D. CLAY, Felix C. Davis, Miner W. Crosby, Charles R. Webb, Albert W. Hudson and R. Woody Rogers, Petitioners, v. O. Frank THORNTON, Secretary of State of South Carolina, Robert W. Turner, Pete B. Adams, Ben T. Austin, III, W. Earl Beard, Sr., W.W. Taylor, Jr., Eugene R. Ott, and John E. Moon, Respondents. 18958 Supreme Court of South Caro

PER CURIAM. In an action on a guaranty contract, which was tried without a jury, judgment was entered for the defendant and the plaintiff appealed. The determinative question is whether the instrument sued on was a guaranty of payment or was a guaranty of collecti-bility. The former is enforceable without first exercising diligence by proceeding against the principal obligor as required in the case of a g

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge. On May 23, 1986, an eighteen-count indictment was filed in the Western District of Pennsylvania. The indictment charged George Thornton and others known and unknown with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 1,000 pounds of marihuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. According to the indictment and the

Justice Lehrmann delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Hecht, Justice Devine, Justice Brown, and Justice Blacklock joined. This action stems from a contract dispute over an offset provision in an oil and gas lease. The court of appeals held that the lessee did not conclusively demonstrate compliance with the provision and reversed the trial court's summary judgment in the lessee's favor. Because the court of appeals rea

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 16-0505 444444444444 MURPHY EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY—USA, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. SHIRLEY ADAMS, CHARLENE BURGESS, WILLIE MAE HERBST JASIK, WILLIAM ALBERT HERBST, HELEN HERBS

731 F.2d 465 34 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 649,33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,252, 17 Ed. Law Rep. 13 Mary CRAIK, Julie Andrzejewski, Joan Hemmer, and JuneGoemer, Appellants,v.The MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD; St. Cloud StateUniversity; Garry Hays; Charles J. Graham; Lowell R.Gillett; Kenneth A. Ames; Frank G. Chesley; Arnold C.Anderson; Howard B. Casmey; Thomas P. Coughlon; Robert W.Ir

NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion

JOSEPH, J. Plaintiffs obtained an alternative writ of mandamus against the Public Employes’ Retirement Board1 to require that it "Stop acting as trustee for any gubernatorial retirement funds paid by any governor or former governor after the date of December 7,1972 and that gubernatorial benefits be computed on amounts actually received on or before the effective date of the repeal of the aforesaid

485 P.2d 434 (1971) STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Joseph Albert O'BRIEN, Appellant. Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2. Argued and Submitted April 20, 1971. Decided May 28, 1971. Rehearing Denied June 29, 1971. Review Granted September 21, 1971. Bruce E. Smith, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

364 F.Supp.2d 1020 (2005) In re XCEL ENERGY, INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Shareholder Derivative Action Edith Gottlieb v. Xcel Energy, Inc., et al. MDL No. 1511, No. 02-2677 (DSD/FLN), No. CIV.A. 02-2931. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. April 1, 2005. Guri Ademi, Not Admitted, for Max Bruckner, S

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Albert Dixon, appeals a decision of the Clermont County Municipal Court denying his motion for a new trial. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the decision of the trial court. {¶ 2} Appellant was stopped by Trooper Amy Pennington of the Ohio State Highway Patrol on August 26, 2006, for the absence of a front license plate on his motor

Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI

400 F.Supp. 285 (1975) UNITED STATES of America v. Eugene BAYNES, a/k/a "Bo" et al. Misc. No. 74-603, Crim. No. 74-523. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. July 3, 1975. As Amended August 5 and September 5, 1975. *286 *287 *288

364 F.Supp.2d 1013 (2005) In re XCEL ENERGY, INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE &"ERISA" LITIGATION. This Document Relates to Case Nos. 03-2218 and 03-2219, the "ERISA Actions." No. CIV.02-2677(DSD/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. April 1, 2005. Guri Ademi, Not Admitted, for Max Bruckner, Stephen Herod, Plaintiffs. James L Altman, Xcel Energy, Mpls

OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. In United States v. Baynes (Appeal of Trice), 622 F.2d 66 (3d Cir. 1980), this Court ordered that an evidentiary hearing be held with respect to the habeas petition brought by Gregory Trice, who claimed he had not received the effective assistance of counsel at his trial. On remand, after conducting such a hearing, the district court determined that Trice’s

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Appellant Gregory Trice appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denying without an evidentiary hearing his motion to vacate and set aside his sentence brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1976).1 Trice was convicted on various drug-related offenses in the district court in 1975. At t

186 F.Supp. 235 (1960) Joseph RAYBOULD, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Rose Raybould, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. MANCINI-FATTORE COMPANY, John S. Ventrelli, Donald Mancini, Albert Mancini, Lillian Loquer, Mathilda Ventrelli, Eugene J. Fattore, Stephen J. Fattore, Jr., and Catherine Fattore, d/b/a Mancini-Fattore Company, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 18585. United States District Court E. D.

39 So.3d 1061 (2009) Helen Kathryn WHEELER et al. v. Randall L. GEORGE et al. Southdale, LLC v. Randall L. George et al. Todd Strange v. Helen Kathryn Wheeler et al. No. 1070484, 1070487 and 1070514. Supreme Court of Alabama. December 4, 2009. *1067 Eugene P. Stutts, Steve R. Burford, Thomas S. Hiley, and