Cases

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion and legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Velasquez, J.), dated March 28, 2014, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Brauner Baron Rosenweig and Klein and David Brauner which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asse

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1639 ___________________________ Christopher Lankford Plaintiff - Appellant v. City of Plumerville, Arkansas Defendant

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 4, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court _______

295 F.3d 1002 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ricardo A. BRAVO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-50159. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 2, 2001. Submission Withdrawn November 21, 2001. Re-submitted May 13, 2002. Filed July 8, 2002.

272 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2003) Linda AKEE et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-382BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 21, 2003. *1113 *1114 *1115 *1116

ORDER GRANTING SHELL’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART¡ DOW’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING DOLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT TV KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court, pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is Shell Oil Company’s, Shell Petroleum Inc.’s, Shell Chemical Company’s, and She

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201