Cases

PER CURIAM: Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward Lee Lewis appeals the district court’s orders: accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed July 8, 2011, 2011 WL 2669203, be affirmed. The Bureau of Prisons has exempted its

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: George E. Carter appeals the district court order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to Defendants on Carter’s civil action, and dismissing Carter’s complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carter v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 1:05-cv-00130, 2007

451 F.3d 1231 Glenn A. WRIGHT, Petitioner-Appellant,v.FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and Joe L. Norwood, Respondents-Appellees. No. 05-1383. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 7, 2006. David Alan Lewis, Brooklyn, NY, (Colleen B. Scissors, Offices of Colleen B. Scissors, LLC, Grand Junction, CO, on the

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge On July 11, 2017, this Court denied plaintiff Mark A. Lane's motion to reconsider the 2011 Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing the above-captioned case. (See Order, ECF No. 17 ("July 2017 Order").) Plaintiff now moves for reconsideration of that Order. (See Pl.'s Second Mot. for Reconsideration, Oct. 10, 2017, ECF No. 18 ("2d Mot.").) For the reasons stated here

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) VANESSA CROWE & GLEN GALEMMO, ) on behalf of themselves and others similarly ) situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-819 (RDM) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss, or, in the alternative, to

149 F.3d 1163 Michael Alan Crookerv.E.W. Morris, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution,Kathleen Hawk, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons NO. 96-5782 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. March 24, 1998 Appeal From: D.N.J. ,No.95cv02820 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-0765 (BAH) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment, on May 5, 2

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 13, 2019 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENT

OPINION PER CURIAM. In 2010, Walter J. Himmelreich — a federal prisoner — filed a complaint against numerous defendants, alleging several *577 causes of action. The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. On appeal, in Case No. 11-3474, we affirm

579 F.Supp. 309 (1984) Michael Alan CROOKER, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 83-2505. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 14, 1984. Michael Alan Crooker, pro se. Patricia Daniells Carter, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION JUNE L. GREEN, Distric

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Mark Alan Lane, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0981 (ESH) ) Federal Bureau of Prisons,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) In the Matter of the ) Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Execution ) Protocol Cases, ) ) LEAD CASE: Roane, et al. v. Barr ) Case No. 19-mc-145 (TSC) ) THIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER, SR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-1781 (BAH) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendants filed a motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment, see

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK ALAN LANE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1269 (RJL) ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRIS