Cases

181 F.Supp.2d 206 (2002) Manuel CONCEPCION, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. No. CV 97-2171(ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. January 24, 2002. *207 *208 *209 Manuel Concepcion, Lompoc, CA, Petitioner Pro Se. Ruth

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. The Short North Posse gang-and its two subsidiaries, the Homicide Squad and Cut Throat Committee-wreaked havoc for the better part of a decade in the Short North neighborhood of Columbus, Ohio. To support its drug enterprise, the Short North Posse conducted brutal home-invasion style robberies and planned and executed the murder of rivals, high-value targets, and

Justice DEVINE delivered the opinion of the Court. Two groups of cotton farmers sue to rescind contracts in which they agreed to sell cotton through a cooperative marketing pool. The farmers allege that they were fraudulently induced to join the cooperative and seek damages, declaratory relief, and attorney’s fees under various statutes. Because the agreemen

983 F.2d 369 5 Fed.Sent.R. 299 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Manuel CONCEPCION, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson Frias,Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 1660, 1663 and 1664, Dockets 91-1151(L), 91-1179,91-1341 and 91-1424. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued June 22, 1992.Decided Dec. 28, 1992.Order on Den

SNEED, Circuit Judge: Appellant Alan Nohara (“Nohara”) appeals his conviction for distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). The primary issue is whether Nohara had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hallway outside his apartment in his high security, high rise apartment building. We hold that he did not and affirm. I. <

PARKER, Chief District Judge: The defendants-appellants appeal from judgments of conviction entered on March 23, 1993 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, following a three-week jury trial before the Honorable I. Leo Glasser. All defendants-appellants were convicted on a six-count superseding indictment charging them with participating in a c

BECKER, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises important questions of construction of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 at 66 (1996). Plaintiff Robert Spruill is an inmate in the custody of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. Spruill filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against four defendants at the State Corre

MINER, Circuit Judge: Defendants appeal from judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Dearie, J.), following a jury trial, convicting them of numerous offenses arising from their participation in a war between competing factions of the Colombo organized crime family. Defendant-appellant Louis Malpeso was convicted on four counts o

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER POLLAK, United States Magistrate Judge: On December 29, 2014, plaintiff Jovana N. Moukengeschaie filed this putative class action on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated consumers against defendants Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C., LVNV Funding LLC, and Resurgent Capital Services L.P., alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 16

PER CURIAM: After the parties filed their appellate briefs in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). The *895district court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to stay the proceedings pending arbitration is VACATED, and this case is fully REMANDED to the district

766 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2011) Ignacio Damian FIGUEROA, Plaintiff, v. MERSCORP, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 10-61296-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. January 31, 2011. *1307 Kenneth Eric Trent, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff. Andrew Benjamin Boese, Robert Mark Brochin, Morgan, Lewis &a;

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. After Marilyn Hopkins died in a nursing home, her estate sued the 'owners and operators of the nursing home (together, “Preferred Care”) in Kentucky state court; raising several claims under Kentucky law. Preferred Care asked a federal court to enforce the arbitration provision in Hopkins’ admissions agreement. The district

655 F.3d 225 (2011) Keith LITMAN; Robert Wachtel, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless. No. 08-4103. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued November 5, 2009. Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on June 6, 2011. Filed: August 24, 2011.

(2007) Carmen MOREL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER AG, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-2162 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 14, 2007. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, District Judge. On February 23, 2007, plaintiffs Carmen Morel and Jose Roman ("plaintiffs") were ordered to file Fernando Roman's

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1187 BARRY ROWLAND; DONNA ROWLAND, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. SANDY MORRIS FINANCIAL & ESTATE PLANNING SERVICES, LLC; SANDEVA O’BRYAN MORRIS, Defendants – Appellants, and GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC; GF INVESTMENT SERVICES, LLC; MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM STAY AND COMPELLING ARBITRATION Thomas B. McNamara, United States Bankruptcy Court Judge Does bankruptcy eclipse arbitration? Arbitration proceedings pending before bank*259ruptcy generally are stopped by the automatic stay—a key protection that allows a bankruptcy debtor breathing space to reorgani

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

Memorandum Opinion and Order Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge Yolanda Henderson brought this putative class action against U.S. Patent Commission, Ltd. and several of its employees, The Gray Law Group and several of its employees, and two defendants who have been dismissed. Doc. 72. Earlier in the litigation, Defendants moved to compel arbitration, Docs. 33, 36, and the court granted the motio

743 F.Supp. 134 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ricardo MELENDEZ, et al., Defendants. No. CR-89-229 (S5) (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 4, 1990. Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty., E.D. N.Y., Brooklyn, N.Y. by Peter R. Ginsberg, and Edward A. Rial, Asst. U.S. Attys., and Hochheiser & Aronson, New York City, for defendant Ric

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6571 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER LANCASTER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior Dis