Cases

936 N.E.2d 1174 (2010) The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Evan GRIFFITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-09-1001. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. September 30, 2010. *1176 Anita Alvarez, State's Attorney, County of Cook, Chicago, IL (Alan J. Spellberg, Susan R. Schierl Sullivan, Ma

760 F.Supp.2d 345 (2010) Anastasia GRIFFITH, Alan Weissman, & Matthew D. Wolf, Plaintiff, v. STEINER WILLIAMSBURG, LLC, Defendant. No. 09 Civ. 9747(AJP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 3, 2010. *347 Philip Ransom Schatz, Steven Ira Fox, Wrobel & Schatz LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Evan R

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SEAN J. GRIFFITH, ) ) Appellant, )

896 P.2d 334 (1995) 127 Idaho 8 STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, Cross-Appellant, v. Gary GRIFFITH, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Respondent. No. 21112. Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, March 1995 Term. June 2, 1995. Alan Lance, Idaho Atty. Gen.; Myrna A.I. Stahman, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for cross-appellant. Myrna A.I. Stahman argued

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns an attempt by the Appellants to intervene in this class-action suit for purposes of modifying a protective order and settlement agreement that preclude them from reviewing materials obtained by the plaintiffs through discovery. Appellants are the claimants in an arbitration proceeding with similar parties and issues, and they wish to a

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 12-DEC-2024 08:26 AM Dkt. 84 SO CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX (co

842 F.Supp. 1359 (1994) Sandra Jean GRIFFITH, individually and on behalf of Felicia Renee Griffith, Benjamin Lee Griffith, and Jonathan Andrew Griffith, minors and heirs at law of Jimmy R. Griffith, Jr., deceased, Plaintiff, v. MT. CARMEL MEDICAL CENTER, a Kansas Corporation; Eugene Carl McCormick, an Individual, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 92-1141-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas.

Porcari v Griffith (2019 NY Slip Op 00918) Porcari v Griffith 2019 NY Slip Op 00918 Decided on February 6, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciar

People v Griffith (2019 NY Slip Op 00141) People v Griffith 2019 NY Slip Op 00141 Decided on January 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

02/25/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 27, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JASON MONROE GRIFFITH Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. S66986 William K. Rogers, Judge ___________________________________

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00105-CV ___________________________ GARY MILLHOLLON AND CAROLE MILLHOLLON, Appellants V. ALAN D. DOUGLAS AND PEGGY J. DOUGLAS,

Griffith v Atkins Glenmore Realty, LLC (2019 NY Slip Op 03957) Griffith v Atkins Glenmore Realty, LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 03957 Decided on May 22, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law R

809 F.Supp. 839 (1992) Sandra Jean GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. MT. CARMEL MEDICAL CENTER, a Kansas Corporation; Eugene Carl McCormick, an Individual; Physician Staffing Resources, Inc., a Texas Corporation; and Judith Ulery, an Individual, Defendants. No. 92-1141-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. December 15, 1992. *840 J

831 F.Supp. 1532 (1993) Sandra Jean GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. MT. CARMEL MEDICAL CENTER, a Kansas Corporation; Eugene Carl McCormick, an Individual; Physician Staffing Resources, Inc., a Texas Corporation; and Judith Ulery, an Individual, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 92-1141-MLB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 23, 1993. *1533<

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BELOT, District Judge. This case comes before the court on defendants’ motion to retax costs (Doc. 336). This case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff. The Clerk taxed costs against defendants in the amount of $44,100.48. Defendants object to the following items included in that amount: (1) costs incurred by plaintiff in videot

Appellate Case: 23-1135 Document: 130-1 Date Filed: 02/19/2025Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH February 19, 2025 UNITED STATES COU

715 P.2d 905 (1985) 110 Idaho 235 Linda S. GRIFFITH, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William SCHMIDT and Jill Schmidt, husband and wife; Frank Schmidt and Jane Doe Schmidt, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants. No. 15617. Supreme Court of Idaho. June 18, 1985. On Rehearing February 20, 1986. On Rehearing February 20, 1986.</

07/08/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 10, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSHUA TRAVIS GRIFFITH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Warren County No. 18-CR-2044 Larry B. Stanley, Jr., Judge No. M2020-00521-CCA-R3-CD A

RUSSELL GRIFFITH V STATE NO. 07-96-0140-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 9, 1998 _________________________________ RUSSELL ALAN GRIFFITH, AP

NO. 07-96-0140-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 9, 1998 _________________________________ RUSSELL ALAN GRIFFITH, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE