Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 484 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 485 OPINION Appellant, the law firm of Daar Newman, previously represented respondent, VRL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL BUCKNER et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONSOL ENERGY INC. et al., Civil Action No. 20-1148 (TJK) Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COM- PANY et al., Third-Party Defendants. MEMORAN

W. Keith Watkins, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Tonya Collier, Donald Lee Alexander, Ginger Lowrey, R.L.P., Brian Burroughs, and Marlo Saunders allege that Alabama Department of Human Resources ("DHR") officials deprived them of procedural due process in violation of 42

\ 3 \ l 321832'0} RECE\VED lM ' l couRT or cRiMmAL APPEALS k MAR 16 2015 l CASE NUMBER: 2009-385-C2A /Z`E`CXEB'AR&W» @i@lk § IN THE DISTRICT COURT BOBBY JoE BUCKNER § ’ 54"' JUDICI_AL DISTRICT TDCJ-CID#01740805. § MC LENNAN coUNTY, TEXAS APPLICANT BUCKNER’S TRAVERSE TO THE STATE’S ORIGINAL ANSWER WITH BRIEF IN SUPPORT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: CQMES NOW, Bobby J. Buckner, Applicant, proceeding in pro se, in the above-styled and numbered cause and files this, his Traverse to the S

680 F.Supp.2d 932 (2010) Sheila BUCKNER, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. 09 C 2550. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 13, 2010. *933 Frederick J. Daley, Jr., Kimberly Ann Jones, Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00227-CV _______________________ IN THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY ALAN WRIGHT On Appeal from the 1A District Court Jasper County, Texas Trial

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: In this diversity action, Dwight H. Smith, M.D. (Smith) appeals from the district court’s declaratory judgment, finding that Allstate Insurance Co. (Allstate) was not required to reimburse Smith pursuant to his “all risk” insurance policy for damage to his business equipment and improvements, and for his loss of earnings. We reverse.

DILLON, Judge. The American Diabetes Association appeals from the trial court’s order denying its Motion to Intervene in an interpleader action filed by Charles Schwab & Company, Inc. (Schwab) for the purpose of determining the rightful beneficiary of an individual retirement account owned by Alan J. McEntee (the Decedent) and held by Schwab. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s order denying interventio

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: The Martins appeal the district court’s decision that they are not entitled to reimbursement under insurance contracts with Lloyds for jewelry stolen from Dorothy Hamill Martin (Hamill). We find that the district court correctly held that Hamill failed to comply with the hotel restriction of the policies, and we therefore affirm. FACTS Hamill and Martin insure

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts III and IV. The State Board of Equalization (the Board) appeals from a summary judgment awarding a refund of sales taxes, interest, and penalties in favor of Modern Paint and Body Supply, Inc. (Modern). Modern is a business that sells products used in auto body repair. It sol

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 16, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TERRY WAYNE BUCKNER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 30644 & 31664 L. Craig Johnson, Judge No. M2003-01010-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 7, 2005 Following a jury trial, Defendant, Terry Wayne Buckner, was convicted of t

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT AND COUNTER-CLAIMANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL DENNIS L. BECK, United States Magistrate Judge. This is a diversity action wherein Plaintiff, American Protection Insurance Company (APICO) filed suit against Helm Concentrates, Inc. and Helm Tomatoes, Inc. (Helm) seeking a declaration that its commercial “all-risk” policy does not provide coverage for losses claimed by Helm owing t

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE AUGUST 7, 2003 Session IRBY C. SIMPKINS, JR. v. PEACHES G. BLANK, formerly Simpkins Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 00D - 156 Walter C. Kurtz, Judge No. M2002-02383-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 30, 2003 This case involves an appeal from a grant of summary judgment e

Opinion issued August 27, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00251-CV ——————————— STEPHEN H. DERNICK AND DAVID D. DERNICK, Appellants V. FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO GARDER

267 Cal.App.2d 672 (1968) ERWIN BONDI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JEWELS BY EDWAR, LTD. et al., Defendants and Respondents. California Court of Appeals. Nov. 26, 1968. Lippitt & Billet and Alan G. Buckner for Plaintiff and Appellant. Morris D. Coppersmith and Frederick J. Glassman for Defendants and Respondents. FRAMPTON, J. pro tem. [fn. *]

10/29/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 9, 2021 Session RACHEL VICTORY ET AL. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Tennessee Claims Commission (Middle Division) No. T20191169 James A. Haltom, Commissioner ________________________________

495 F.Supp. 351 (1979) John BUCKNER and wife, Olavene Buckner v. GAF CORP., Rubberoid Division; The Celotex Corp.; Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Successor by merger with Johns-Manville Products Corp.; Johns-Manville Corp.; Southern Asbestos Co., Thermoid Division, Subsidiary of H. K. Porter Co., Inc.; and Empire Ace Insulation Mfg. Corp. et al. No. CIV-1-79-49. United States District Court, E. D. Tenness

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Arbitration-friendly federal law recognizes “delegation clauses” that direct an arbitrator to decide the validity of an arbitration agreement. Still, litigants can waive their right to enforce these arbitration provisions. Because KeyBank waited too long to invoke a delegation clause, waiver now bars that path and the district

224 Cal.App.3d 86 (1990) 274 Cal. Rptr. 20 HILBERT CHU et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CANADIAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. D010413. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. September 18, 1990. *89 COUNSEL Churchill & Kaplan, Gordon S. Chur

SECOND DIVISION ELLINGTON, C. J., BARNES, P. J., and McFADDEN, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/