⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Alan B Adams”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-01-22 · Published · cited 1× · 138 S. Ct. 931; 200 L. Ed. 2d 204
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 696 F. App'x 511
JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Indiana Supreme Court · 2019-06-04 · Published · cited 12× · 123 N.E.3d 689
Slaughter, Justice. We hold that a valid forum-selection clause, in which the parties agree by contract to litigate their disputes in a specific forum, does not deprive a trial court of personal jurisdiction over parties that would otherwise be subject to the court's jurisdiction. Thus, the trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's claims against the Indiana-resident defendants un
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-05-09 · Published · cited 6× · 126 Fed. Cl. 645; 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 480; 2016 WL 2731980
Keywords: Judgment on the Administrative Record; RCFC 52.1(c); 10 U.S.C. § 1201; 10 U.S.C. § 1413a; Military Retirement Pay; Combat-Related Special Compensation. OPINION AND ORDER Kaplan, Judge. This case is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. The plaintiff, Alan B.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 108 N.E.3d 933
May, Judge. [1] Daniel T. O'Bryant, doing business as O'Bryant Transport, LLC (collectively "O'Bryant"), appeals the trial court's dismissal of its claims against Alan P. Adams and Luan Adams, doing business as A.L.A. Trucking, Inc. (collectively "ALA"). The trial court dismissed the case because the contract between O'Bryant and ALA required any litigation resulting from the parties' a
Adams v. Braypublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-10-16 · Published · cited 0× · 152 So. 3d 7; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16921; 2014 WL 5304942
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Matthews v. Steinberg, No. 1D14-3477, 2014 WL 5305574 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). LEWIS, C.J., CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-03-06 · Published · cited 132× · 744 F.3d 326; 2014 WL 868667; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4188
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge DIAZ and Judge ANDERSON have joined. FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Since the United States began its military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq in 2001 and 2003, respectively, its use of private contractors to support its mission has risen to “unprecedented levels.” Comm’n on
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010-01-26 · Published · cited 4× · 76 Mass. App. Ct. 180; 920 N.E.2d 879
Smith, J. The board of assessors of Westport (assessors) appeals from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (tax board) abating a conveyance tax assessed pursuant to G. L. c. 61A, § 12, on real estate owned by Milton and Marilyn Adams (taxpayers). We affirm. Under G. L. c. 61A, the so-called Agricultural Classification Act,2 “the owner of five acres or more of land that has been i
State v. Adamspublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008-03-26 · Published · cited 148× · 943 A.2d 851; 194 N.J. 186; 2008 N.J. LEXIS 144
943 A.2d 851 (2008) 194 N.J. 186 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ibn ADAMS, a/k/a Ali Ibn Adams (Fact), Ali-Ibn Adams (Apmis) and Ibn A. Adams, Defendant-Appellant. State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James Comer, a/k/a James B. Comer and James F. Comer, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued October 23, 2007.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2011-03-22 · Published · cited 2× · 455 B.R. 273; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 1217; 2011 WL 1321401
455 B.R. 273 (2011) In re G. David VOLPITTO, Debtor. Todd Adams, Paul Chancellor, Erica Collins, Joyce Dross, Jeff Hornung, Lance Hudson, Mary Ann Kinsler, Dean Loss, Dennis Moberg Todd Nesley, Jamie Porterfield, Keith B. Powell, Robert Sarafin, Alan Smith, Thomas E. Starnes, Matthew Stewart, Martin J. Taylor George Maule, and Cindi Griffith, Plaintiffs v. G. David Volpitto, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-12350. Adversary
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023-08-29 · Published · cited 3× · 301 A.3d 802; 2023 ME 59
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 59 Docket: Cum-22-394 Argued: July 6, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. ALAN R. ATKINS et al. v. MARIE F. ADAMS et al. CONNORS, J. [¶1] Alan R. Atkins and Gail P. Atkin
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025-06-04 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT THOMAS FARESE, Appellant, v. ALAN B. AKER, M.D. and AKER KASTEN EYE CENTER, INC., Appellees. No. 4D2024-0454 [June 4, 2025] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fiftee
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 18, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-1169 Lower Tribunal No. 22-9519-FC-04 ________________ Alan Oria, Appellant,
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005-10-24 · Published · cited 0× · 396 F. Supp. 2d 30; 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2406; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24878; 2005 WL 2767146
396 F.Supp.2d 30 (2005) MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff v. NORTH ADAMS REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Defendant No. CIV.A.05-30145-KPN. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 24, 2005. Mark A. Hickernell, McDonald & Associates, Alan J. McDonald, McDonald & Associates, Southborough, MA, for Massachusetts Nurses Association, Plaintiff.
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2009-01-22 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed January 22, 2009 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-08-00233-CR __________ PHILLIP ALAN ADAMS, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from
District Court, E.D. California · 2010-08-23 · Published · cited 0× · 735 F. Supp. 2d 1189; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94016; 2010 WL 3341894
735 F.Supp.2d 1189 (2010) PARAMOUNT FARMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. VENTILEX B.V., Defendant. Case No. CV F 08-1027 LJO SKO. United States District Court, E.D. California. August 23, 2010. *1191 Adam Phillip Zaffos, Christopher Van Gundy, Roll International Corporation, Legal Department, Mark D. Campbell, Robert Joseph Catalano, Loeb
State v. Adamspublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ohio 2800
[Cite as State v. Adams, 2025-Ohio-2800.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-24-1234 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0202302262 v. Anthony Alan Bais Adams DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2009-01-22 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed January 22, 2009
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006-10-26 · Published · cited 13× · 467 F.3d 27; 180 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2972; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 26635; 2006 WL 3028389
SELYA, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to mull the circumstances in which a union, having successfully arbitrated a grievance, may leverage the award to bypass procedures prescribed by a collective bargaining agreement and obtain direct federal court relief for subsequent episodes of alleged employer misconduct. In the case at hand, the district court thwarted the union’s a
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-05-31 · Published · cited 4× · 436 F. App'x 739
MEMORANDUM ** PDG Los Arcos, LLC (“PDG”) and National Retail Development Partners, LLC (“NRDP”) appeal the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of their breach of contract actions against “the investors” for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(1) and we affirm. The district court had removal jurisdiction pursuant to