Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Al's Den, Inc.”
In re Al's Den, Inc.public domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE: MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY JON J. CHINEN, Bankruptcy Judge. The “Petition to Lift Stay of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, Civil No. 85-4067,” filed by William Simone (“Simone”) on August 26, 1987, was the subject of a preliminary hearing held on September 23, 1987 and a final hearing on October 13, 1987. At the hearings, Thomas Young, Esq. represented Will
Mad Den, Inc. v. Vaccarinopublic domain
*713 In an action, inter alia, to set aside a mortgage, the defendant Charles A. D’Agostino appeals (1) from a decision of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Rosa, J.), dated August 11, 2015, made after an inquest on the issue of damages on his cross claim against the defendants John A. Vaccarino and Gina M. Vaccarino, and (2), on the grou
Marina Aguila v. Den Caribbean, Inc.public domain
490 F.Supp.2d 244 (2007) Evelyn E. MARINA AGUILA, Plaintiff, v. DEN CARIBBEAN, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 04-2212 (GAG-MEL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 25, 2007. *245 Hector M. Alvarado-Tizol, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Frances R. Colon-Rivera, Francisco M. Viejo-Lopez, Saldana & Carva
3/29/2019 11:35:21 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 16-1498.pdf 16-1498_new.pdf versus 49 pages (226 KB) 49 pages (23
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Larkinpublic domain
582 F.Supp. 1220 (1984) GRENDEL'S DEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. John P. LARKIN, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 77-3418-T. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 19, 1984. Supplemental Opinion April 4, 1984. *1221 *1222 Jonathan Shapiro, Stern & Shapiro, Boston,
Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc.public domain
459 U.S. 116 (1982) LARKIN ET AL. v. GRENDEL'S DEN, INC. No. 81-878. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 4, 1982. Decided December 13, 1982. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT *117 Gerald J. Caruso, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, argued the cause <
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkinpublic domain
COFFIN, Circuit Judge. Appellants challenge an award of attor-. ney’s fees. Arguing that the district court abused its discretion by granting an award which was not “reasonable” within the meaning of the Fees Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1988, appellants ask us to modify it. After carefully reviewing the district court’s opinion, as well as t
Cook v. Sportsman's Den, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Cook v. Sportsman's Den, Inc., 2011-Ohio-3482.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HORACE D. COOK, JR., ET AL. JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Plaintiffs-Appellants Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, J.
HINES, Presiding Justice. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in State of Ga. v. Sun States Ins. Group, 332 Ga. App. 197 (770 SE2d 43) (2015), litigation involving the liquidation of an insurance company, International Indemnity Company (“IIC”), pursuant to the Insurers
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Goodwinpublic domain
495 F.Supp. 761 (1980) GRENDEL'S DEN, INC. v. Herbert N. GOODWIN et al. Civ. A. No. 77-3418-T. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 14, 1980. *762 Rosenberg, Baker & Fine, David Rosenberg, Cambridge, Mass., Lawrence H. Tribe, Cambridge, Mass., for plaintiff. Gerald Caruso, Thomas Miller, John E. Bowma
Vacco Industries, Inc. v. Van Den Bergpublic domain
5 Cal.App.4th 34 (1992) 6 Cal. Rptr.2d 602 VACCO INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. TONY VAN DEN BERG et al., Defendants and Appellants Docket No. B046336. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. April 2, 1992. *40 COUNSEL Limbach, Limbach & Sutton,
Den Hartog Industries v. Dunganpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1402 Filed January 9, 2025 DEN HARTOG INDUSTRIES and WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioners-Appellants, vs. TYLER DUNGAN, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie Vaudt, Judge. An employer appeals from a judicial-review proceeding foll
Lloyd F. Smith Co. v. Den-Tal-Ez, Inc.public domain
491 N.W.2d 11 (1992) LLOYD F. SMITH COMPANY, INC., et al., Petitioners, Appellants, v. DEN-TAL-EZ, INC., Emerson Electric Co., Respondents. No. C6-91-841. Supreme Court of Minnesota. October 23, 1992. *12 Joseph F. Lulic, Julianne M. Fiedler, Hanson, Lulic & Krall, Minneapolis, for petitioners-appellants. Mark A. Gwin,
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Herbert N. Goodwin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Herbert N. Goodwinpublic domain
662 F.2d 88 1981-1 Trade Cases 63,978 GRENDEL'S DEN, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Herbert N. GOODWIN et al., Defendants, Appellees.Cambridge License Commission et al., Defendants, Appellants.GRENDEL'S DEN, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Herbert N. GOODWIN et al., Defendants, Appellants. Nos. 80-1653, 80-1654. United States Court of Appeals,Firs
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Herbert N. Goodwin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Herbert N. Goodwinpublic domain
662 F.2d 102 1981-2 Trade Cases 64,310 GRENDEL'S DEN, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Herbert N. GOODWIN, et al., Defendants, Appellees,Cambridge License Commission, et al., Defendants, Appellants.GRENDEL'S DEN, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Herbert N. GOODWIN, et al., Defendants, Appellants. Nos. 80-1653, 80-1654. United States Court of Appeals,
Lloyd F. Smith Co., Inc. v. Den-Tal-Ezpublic domain
478 N.W.2d 510 (1991) LLOYD F. SMITH COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellants, v. DEN-TAL-EZ, Emerson Electric Co., Respondents. No. C6-91-841. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. November 26, 1991. Review Granted March 9, 1992. *512 Joseph F. Lulic, Julianne M. Fiedler, Hanson, Lulic & Krall, Minneapolis, for appellants
Den Beste v. Pollution Control Hearings Boardpublic domain
914 P.2d 144 (1996) 81 Wash.App. 330 Fred W. DEN BESTE; Billy Z. Wolfe; Wyckoff Farms, Inc., "350" Hoff Orchard Partnership; Golden Gate Hop Ranches, Inc.; Auld Ranch; Kenneth E. Lewis; John N. Anderson; Hill Fruits; A/B Hop Farms, Inc.; Tudor Hills Vineyard, Inc.; Skyvue Orchards Inc.; Doris Brulotte; Vista Ridge Orchards; Marion Vance; State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources; and State of Washington, Department of E
Arballo v. Fresenius USA, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge. Defendant Northridge Dialysis Center (“Northridge”), a California dialysis clinic, moves to dismiss claims against it by a California plaintiff, Josephine Arballo. Arballo moves to remand the entire case to California state court, and the Fresenius defendants (“FMCNA”) seek to keep the case as part of this multi-district litigation (“MDL
Van Den Berg v. Northside Realty Associates, Inc.public domain
172 Ga. App. 591 (1984) 323 S.E.2d 839 VAN DEN BERG v. NORTHSIDE REALTY ASSOCIATES, INC. et al. 68267. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided October 29, 1984. Rehearing Denied November 15, 1984. Joseph A. Carragher, Jr., for appellant. Frederick G. Boynton, for appellees. BENHAM, Judge. North
Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bankpublic domain
Justice SOTOMAYORdelivered the opinion of the Court. Rights in a trademark are determined by the date of the mark's first use in commerce. The party who first uses a mark in commerce is said to have priority over other users. Recognizing that trademark users ought to be permitted to make certain modifications to their marks over time without losing priority, lower courts have provided