Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Akers v. Madoff”
Sacher v. Beacon Associates Management Corp.public domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for professional negligence, the defendant Friedberg, Smith & Co., EC., appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and a letter dated June 5, 2013, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered April 28, 2010, as denied that branch of its motion which was pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ordered
Sacher v. Beacon Associates Management Corp.public domain
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for professional negligence, the defendant Friedberg, Smith & Co., EC., appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and a letter dated June 5, 2013, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered April 28, 2010, as denied that branch of its motion which was pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it. Ordered
Hecht v. Andover Associates Management Corp.public domain
*639In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for professional negligence, the defendant Citrin Cooperman & Co., LLP, appeals, as limited by its brief and a letter dated June 5, 2013, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J), entered March 16, 2010, as denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it,
Hecht v. Andover Associates Management Corp.public domain
*639In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for professional negligence, the defendant Citrin Cooperman & Co., LLP, appeals, as limited by its brief and a letter dated June 5, 2013, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J), entered March 16, 2010, as denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against it,
OPINION OF THE COURT Tom, J.P. In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether New York law, rather than Delaware law, applies to this corporate litigation resulting from the never ending saga of Bernard L. Mad-off’s Ponzi scheme. This appeal also raises issues concerning whether plaintiff’s claims are precluded by the doctrine of in pari delicto;
In re Stillwater Capital Partners Inc. Litigationpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This consolidated putative class action, which concerns only state law claims, is part of a larger multi-district litigation.1 It arises out of plaintiffs’ investments in the various Stillwater Funds2 and Stillwater’s3
In Re Optimal U.S. Litigationpublic domain
813 F.Supp.2d 351 (2011) In re OPTIMAL U.S. LITIGATION. No. 10 Civ. 4095(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 2, 2011. *355 Edward W. Miller, Esq., Alan Ian Ellman, Esq., Javier Bleichmar, Esq., Joel H. Bernstein, Esq., Labaton Sucharow, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. Gustavo J. Membiela, Esq., Samuel A. Dano