Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge. Plaintiff Aida Velez asserts claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692k et seq., and *1079the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq., against Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc. (“PRA, In

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA F&R CARGO EXPRESS, LLC, FILED Defendant Below, Petitioner May 14, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. v.) Nos. 24-ICA-242, 24-ICA-243, 24-ICA-244 ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK (Cir. Ct. of Ohio Cnty. Case Nos. CC-35-2022-C-10,

161 Mich. App. 370 (1987) 410 N.W.2d 817 McGILLIS v. AIDA ENGINEERING, INC Docket No. 92014. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided July 7, 1987. Christensen & Christensen (by Timothy J. Christensen), for plaintiff. Sommers, Schwartz, Silver & Schwartz, P.C. (by Leonard B. Schwartz and Patrick J. Burk

MILLIGAN V SOTO NO. 07-00-0543-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D JUNE 22, 2001 ______________________________

15 F.Supp.2d 1338 (1998) Jack SCHEER, Doris K. Scheer, Abe Sikma, Vicente San Pelayo, Esther Gutierrez, Antonio Cuenca, Bertha Cuenca, Nieves Sotolongo, Aida Victoria Ortega, Natalio Ortega, Maria Olimpia Duque, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MIAMI, City of Miami Canvassing Board for the November 4, 1997 City of Miami Election, Walter J. Foreman. David Leahy, Xavier L. Suarez, and Joe Carollo, Defend

OPINION and ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are defendants’ (“Defendants”) motion to dismiss under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Docket # 16) and plaintiffs’ (“Plaintiffs”) opposition thereto (Docket # 36).1 After reviewing the filings *123and the applicable law, Defendants’ motion is GRANT

OPINION & ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Petitioner, Antonio De Jesús-Velázquez (“petitioner”), filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“2255 motion”), on July 11, *2072011. ECF No. 1. The Court granted petitioner leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. ECF No. 5. On Octo

SPATT, District Judge. Familiarity with the factual and procedural history of this case is presumed. Jury selection is scheduled for March 16, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. On September 7, 2012, the Plaintiff Scott Eberle (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action, which arises from an incident which occurred on August 3, 2011 while the Plaintiff was in the custody of the Southampton Town Police. This action was commenced

This list is being published pursuant to Gov.Bar R. 1(15). The following persons have applied to take the February 2017 Ohio Bar Examination. Allen Taylor Gene Vance Lima Ashland Sarah Kathleen Lewis Austinburg Belmont Carson Lee Schambach St. Clairsville Butler Eric ScottBeutel Liberty Township Marc Edward Bras

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Petitioner, Wayne Vargas de Jesus (“petitioner” or “Vargas”), filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“2255 motion”) on January 19, 2011. ECF No. 1. Petitioner seeks post-conviction relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Id. at 10-12. Respondent, the United States of Ame

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I concur in all of the majority opinion except part 1(B)(2), qualified immunity for referring the child for an investigatory examination of her private parts. From that part, I respectfully dissent. I concur in the majority’s conclusion that “on the Does’ version of the facts, Herrera violated the Does’ constitutional rights to family association a

348 F.3d 820 George DOE, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem; Lacey Doe, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Betsey Warren LEBBOS; Lisvet Carrillo-Herrera; Aida Madeline Lebbos; Aida Lebbos Trust; County of Santa Clara; Santa Clara County Department of Social Services; Santa Clara County Child Protective Services, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-16326. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circ

OPINION This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of burglary of a habitation, enhanced. Appellant was found guilty by a jury and subsequently sentenced by the trial court to a term of imprisonment of 50 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. In a single point of error, Appellant attacks the judgment of conviction. We affirm. I. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE On May 6, 1990, a report was received by the

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

Opinion issued May 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00033-CV ——————————— THE CITY OF LAKE JACKSON AND VELASCO DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellants V. RICKY ADAWAY, ROBERT ADEN, THOMAS ALBERS

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1414 LASHAUN CASEY, Petitioner, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-rCOLÓN, Chief Judge. Presently pending before the Court is petitioner Jean Pierre Baerga-Suárez’s (“petitioner”) motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (“§ 2255”). ECF No. 1. Petitioner filed his § 2255 motion on April 18, 2011. Id. On December 2, 2011, the government filed a response in opposition to petitioner’s m

182 Mich. App. 724 (1990) 452 N.W.2d 902 MACOMB COUNTY PROFESSIONAL DEPUTIES ASSOCIATION v. MACOMB COUNTY Docket No. 109644. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March 20, 1990. Finkel, Whitefield & Selik, P.C. (by Marc G. Whitefield and Peter P. Sudnick), for Macomb County Professional Deputies Association. K

679 F.Supp. 700 (1988) Panzy CALLADINE, individually and as Guardian of William Calladine, Plaintiff, v. DANA CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 87-CV-1739-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. February 29, 1988. *701 Barry P. Waldman, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff. Edward D. Plato,