Cases

Criminal Case Template COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ) IN RE: AGUSTIN SANCHEZ, ) No. 08-05-00382-CR ) Relator. ) AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ) ) IN MANDAMUS

BARRON, Circuit Judge. Jose Gilberto Batres Agustin ("Batres Agustin") is a Guatemalan national. He petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order, which upheld the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of his application for both withholding of removal under 8 U.

ANDREW S. OLDHAM, Circuit Judge: IT IS ORDERED that our prior panel opinion, United States v. Sanchez-Hernandez , 927 F.3d 851 (5th Cir. 2019), is WITHDRAWN and the following opinion is SUBSTITUTED therefor. Agustine Sanchez

ANDREW S. OLDHAM , Circuit Judge : Agustine Sanchez-Hernandez argues the district court plainly erred in calculating his Guidelines range at sentencing. That calculation was based on treating his prior state court convictions-for exposing himself to and sexually assaulting a fourteen-year-old girl-as crimes of violence. We affirm.

ORDER The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed a presentment recommending that AGUSTIN SANCHEZ, a Judge of the Municipal Court of Union City, be publicly reprimanded for violations of Canons 7A(3) and 7C of the Code of Judicial Conduct (A Judge Shall Refrain From Political Activity), Rule 1:17 — 1(h) (prohibiting partisan political activity by all persons employed by or regularly assigned to a municipa

572 F.3d 475 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Yesenia SANCHEZ, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Agustin Morales-Mata, also known as Marco Mendez, Appellant. Nos. 08-2934, 08-2951. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 13, 2009. Filed: July 13, 2009. *4

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Agustín Maldonado Sanchez and Maria De La Cruz Navarro, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) March 16, 2005 order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal and the BIA’s May 9, 2005 order denying their motion to reopen removal proceeding

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Upon review of all of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good ground to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence reverses the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following Opinion and Award. *********** EVIDENTIARY RULING At

Opinion issued December 7, 2006 In The Court of Appeals For The

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 08-2934 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Yesenia Sanchez, * * Ap

570 F.Supp.2d 247 (2008) Cruz MARTINEZ-RIVERA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Roberto SANCHEZ-RAMOS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-2146 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 20, 2008. *249 Edwin Prado-Galarza, Prado, Nunez & Associates, PSC, Francisco Ramos-Martinez, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Maria Jud

No. 1013 November 26, 2025 205 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HUGO AGUSTIN CORREA-SANCHEZ, aka Hugo Agustin Correa, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 22CR31347; A181880 Theodore E. Sims, Judge. Argued and submitted

No. 1013 November 26, 2025 205 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. HUGO AGUSTIN CORREA-SANCHEZ, aka Hugo Agustin Correa, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 22CR31347; A181880 Theodore E. Sims, Judge. Argued and submitt

DECISION CURTIS, District Judge.* The plaintiffs have been indicted and are now named in criminal cases presently pending in the Superior Court. Their indictments are two of several brought about through the efforts of the special prosecutor appointed under the Independent Special Prosecutor Act of 1974, Guam Public Law 12-173. Certain of these indicted defendants have challenged

430 F.Supp.2d 47 (2006) Cruz MARTINEZ-RIVERA, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. Roberto SANCHEZ RAMOS, et al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 05-2146 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 4, 2006. *48 Edwin Prado-Galarza, Prado, Nunez & Associates, PSC, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. *49<

MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592 (9th Cir.2006); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). The petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to petitioners Agustin Victorino Montes Medina, Agency No. A95-1

David S. Doty, Judge, United States District Court *1022This matter is before the court upon the motion for a preliminary injunction by petitioner Agustin Zacarias Matacua. Based on a review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the motion is granted. BACKGROUND Zacarias is a citi

498 F.3d 3 (2007) Cruz MARTÍNEZ-RIVERA, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Roberto SÁNCHEZ RAMOS, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 06-2398. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted May 11, 2007. Decided August 7, 2007. *4 Jo-Ann Estades Boyer, for appellants. Salvador J. Antonnetti-Stutts

MANION, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Agustín Flores-Sandoval (“Flores”) pleaded guilty to one count of attempting to possess with the intent to distribute approximately 72 kilograms of cocaine. He was sentenced to a 200-month term of imprisonment and fined $8,000. Flores appeals his sentence, and argues he should be granted a new sentencing hearing because the go