Cases

OPINION ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Plaintiffs, a group of corporate entities engaged in the production, marketing, distribution, and transmission of broadcast television programs, move to enjoin Defendant AEREO, Inc., (“Aereo”) from engaging in those aspects of its service that allow its users to access “live” copyrighted content over the internet. Aereo claims that its conduct does not

Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. The Copyright Act of 1976 gives a copyright owner the "exclusive righ [t]" to "perform the copyrighted work publicly." 17 U.S.C. § 106 (4). The Act's Transmit Clause defines that exclu

PRESENT: DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, ROBERT A KATZMANN, REENA RAGGI, RICHARD C. WESLEY, PETER W. HALL, DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, GERARD E. LYNCH, DENNY CHIN, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., SUSAN L. CARNEY, CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, Circuit Judges. ORDER Following disposition of this appeal on April 1, 2013, Plaintiffs-Appellants filed petitions for rehearing

CHIN, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. Defendant-appellee Aereo, Inc. (“Aer-eo”) captures over-the-air broadcasts of television programs and retransmits them to subscribers by streaming them over the Internet. For a monthly fee, Aereo’s customers may ‘Watch” the programming “live” (that is, with a seven-second delay) on their computers and other electronic devices, or they may “Record” the programs for

Motion of the Deputy Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND STAY DALE A. KIMBALL, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Community Television of Utah, LLC, KUTV Licensee, and Fox Broadcasting Company’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Plaintiff Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Defendant Aereo, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Su

HALL, Circuit Judge: FilmOn.com, Inc. (“FilmOn”) and Fil-mOn’s Chief Executive Officer, Alkiviades David (“David”), appeal from an August 15, 2014 judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Buchwald, J.) pursuant to a decision holding FilmOn and David in contempt of an August 8, 2012 Consent Order of Judgment and Permanent Injunct

16‐2825‐cv(L) BWP Media USA Inc. v. Polyvore, Inc. 1 2 In the 3 United States Court of Appeals 4 For the Second Circuit 5 ________ 6 7 AUGUST TERM, 2017 8 9 ARGUED: SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 10 DECID

Per Curiam: *44BWP Media USA Inc., Pacific Coast News, and National Photo Group, LLC (collectively "BWP") appeal from a memorandum and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Ronnie Abrams, J. ) that granted summary judgment to Polyvore, Inc. ("Polyvore") on BWP's copyright claims for direct and

OPINION D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellant Perfect 10, Inc. (“Perfect 10” or “P10”) challenges the district court’s partial dismissal of its direct copyright infringement claim and grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees Giganews, Inc. (“Giganews”) and Livewire Services, Inc. (“Livewire”) as to all remaining claims. Perfect 10 also appeals

4/28/2020 9:28:03 AM Compare Results Old File: New File: 18-1150.pdf 18-1150_new.pdf versus 42 pages (243 KB) 42 pages (243 KB)

Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. *1503 The Copyright Act grants potent, decades-long monopoly protection for "original works of authorship." 17 U.S.C. § 102 <

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: This appeal is about whether “volitional conduct” is required to establish a claim for direct copyright infringement. Defendant T & S Software Associates, an internet service provider, hosted an internet forum on which third-party users posted images that infringed copyrights owned by plaintiffs BWP Media USA and National Photo Group. The pl

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT DISH NETWORK LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [372, 383] [UNDER SEAL] DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ motions for summary judgment. The parties appeared for a hearing on their motions on October 17, 2014. The Court has duly considered the parties’ written submiss

OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether a service that captures copyrighted works broadcast over the air, and then retransmits them to paying subscribers over the-Internet without the consent of the copyright holders, is a “cable system” eligible for a compulsory license under the Copyright Act. I

MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER COGAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs are the owners of publishing rights associated with over one hundred copyright registrations covering over two hundred musical recordings. They bring claims against defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Digital Service, Inc. (together “Amazon” or “defendant”), alleging that Amazon infringed their copyrights by distributing phonorecords of p

ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................430 II. BACKGROUND .........................................................430 III. THE MOTION TO QUASH OR MODIFY A SUBPOENA.....................431