Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GXP CAPITAL, LLC, § a Nevada limited liability company,§ Nos. 247, 2020 and 248, 2020 § Plaintiff Below, § Court Below – Superior Court Appellant, § of the State of Delaware § v. § C.A. No. N18C-07-267

338 F.Supp.2d 145 (2004) Valkyrie E. HALL, et al., Plaintiffs v. INTERNET CAPITAL GROUP, INC., Ronald Hovsepian, Mark Lotke, David Chu, and Robert Burch, Defendants No. CIV.02-255-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. October 1, 2004. *146 Glenn Israel, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer, & Nelson, David Soley, Bernstein, Shur, S

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION SEAN H. LANE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court are numerous motions in the above-captioned insurance coverage dispute. Four defendants filed a variety of motions seeking to dismiss the case for, among other things, lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction, and to send the dispute to arbitration.1 These four defendants, which will be co

723 F.Supp. 669 (1989) The CONE CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. 89-540-CIV-T-17(A). United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. October 16, 1989. *670 Herbert P. Schlanger, Atlanta, Ga., Maxwell G. Battle, Jr., R. Michael Deloach, Maxwell G. Battle, Jr., P.A., Duned

2024 IL App (4th) 230513 FILED February 1, 2024 NO. 4-23-0513 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate IN THE APPELLATE COU

The jury found that, as a consequence of the merger and JELD-WEN's conduct in 2014 and thereafter, competition was substantially lessened in the doorskin market and that, as a result, Steves sustained injuries of the type that the antitrust laws were designed to prevent. Thereupon, the jury awarded Steves $58,632,454.00 in antitrust damages which, when trebled as required by statute, amounts to antitrust damages in the amount of $175,897,362.00. The jury al

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0199p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ATRICURE, INC., │ Plaintiff-Appellee,

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0351-SG ) DOWDUPONT INC., CORTEVA, INC., ) AND E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS ) AND COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case: 18-2003 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 04/14/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ERICSSON INC., TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. TCL COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LIMITED, TCT MOBILE LIMITED, TCT MOBILE (US) INC., Defendants-Appellants ______________________

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 15-2364 DOMINIC OLIVEIRA, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. NEW PRIME, INC., Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TA OPERATING LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, Counterclaim-Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12954-CB ) COMDATA, INC., and FLEETCOR ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) ) Defendants, Counterclaimants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION GEORGE J. HAZEL, District Judge. In this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) case, Plaintiffs are former traffic controllers (commonly referred to as “flag-gers”) who allege that Defendant Power-Comm Construction, Inc. and its owner, Defendant David Kwasnik, Sr. (collectively “PowerComm”), failed to pay them appropriate overtime wages. The Court conditionally certified this cas

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this trademark infringement action, Plaintiff Gucci America, Inc. (“Gucci”) seeks a protective order against the disclosure of the communications of its former in-house counsel Jonathan Moss (“Moss”), and non-party Guccio Gucci S.p.A.’s (“GG”) in-house intellectual property counse

227 B.R. 569 (1998) In re JACKSON BROOK INSTITUTE, INC., Debtor-Appellee. BANCBOSTON REAL ESTATE CAPITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JBI ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendant-Appellant. No. Civ. 98-MC-80-P-C. United States District Court, D. Maine. November 24, 1998. *570 *571

ACCEPTED 05-15-01292-CV 05-15-01292-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge This matter is ' currently before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, Dkt. 5, and Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 51. The case grows out of a labor dispute between Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) COUNCIL OF PARENT ATTORNEYS ) AND ADVOCATES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-cv-1636 (TSC) ) ) ELIZABETH (BETSY) DEVOS, ) SECRETARY OF EDUCATIO

ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court as a products liability action pertaining to *1313an inferior vena cava filter, known as the G2®, designed and manufactured by Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.1 On February 19, 2008, a physician im

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 8) AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STAY AND COMPEL ARBITRATION (Docket No. 12) Timothy S. Hillman, United States District Judge Introduction Plaintiff Cutler Associates, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) asserts claims against Defendants Palace Construction, LLC, Colby Palace, LLC, and Optimum Building Systems and Management, Inc

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE