Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1589 ___________________________ Adventist Health System/SunBelt, Inc., et al. lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al.;

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-726 Filed 18 June 2025 Office of Admin. Hearings, No. 23DHR03681 MH MISSION HOSPITAL, LLLP, Petitioner, v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICE REGULATION, HEALTH CARE PLANNING & CERTIFICATE OF NEED, Respondent. Appeal by Petitioner and cross-appeal by Respondent from a final decision entered 10 May 2024 by

978 A.2d 804 (2009) 187 Md. App. 264 Kevin OYARZO v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, et al. No. 1515, September Term, 2007. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. August 26, 2009. *806 Paul Walter (Thomas M. Wilson, III, Tydings & Rosenberg, LLP, on brief), Baltimore, for Appellant.

561 F.Supp. 1092 (1983) PORTLAND ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant.[*] Civ. A. No. 81-2956. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 13, 1983. *1093 Bruce R. Gilbert, Ronald N. Sutter, James C. Pyles, Washington, D.C., for pla

FLAUM, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Paragon Health Network, Inc. (“Paragon”) 1 appeals from a district court decision affirming a determination that its *1144 newly opened skilled nursing facility (“SNF”), Milwaukee Subacute Center (“MSC”), is

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In its progress through the review process this matter has drawn dissent — either formally or in practical effect — at every level. Thus, in the Provider Reimbursement Review Board, Member Sloan dissented on the ground that, when Hinsdale transferred the $5.9 million to Glendale Heights, Glendale Heights was “under Hinsdale’s corporate structure” and “should be treated as if

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD. WALD, Circuit Judge: Under Medicare, a hospital that provides services to eligible patients is entitled to reimbursement under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395-1395ccc (1988). This case is the latest in a series of disputes growing out of the decision of the Secretary of Health

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC15-2180 ____________ JEAN CHARLES, JR., etc., et al., Appellants, vs. SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF FLORIDA, INC., etc., et al., Appellees. [January 31, 2017] PARIENTE, J.

SULLIVAN, C. J., with whom ZARELLA, J., joins, dissenting. The majority concludes that the Appellate Court improperly determined that the plaintiff, Zbigniew Szewczyk,1 did not suffer from an emergency medical condition as that term is defined in Title XIX of *489the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.

919 F.2d 428 STATE OF ILLINOIS by the ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and HumanServices,* and United StatesDepartment of Health and Human Services,Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-3541. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit.

708 F.Supp. 1135 (1989) OREGON ASSOCIATION OF HOSPITALS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, on behalf of its participating members; Portland Adventist Medical Center; and St. Charles Medical Center, Inc., dba St. Charles Medical Center, Plaintiffs, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States of America; Department of Health and Human Services, an agency of the United States of America, Def

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The State of Illinois, by the Illinois Department of Public Aid, filed this suit after denial of its request for federal funds pursuant to Title XX of the Social Security Act, Social Services Amendments of 1974, Pub.L. No. 93-647, 88 Stat. 2337 (1975). Illinois appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants (referred to collectively as the Secretary). For the following reasons, we

ORDER SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Atrium Medical Center, et al. (Doc. No. 23) and Defendant Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (Doc. No. 25). For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is well-taken and is GRANTED; Plaintiffs’

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Will Rogers once said, “The minute you read something and you can’t understand it, you can almost be sure that it was drawn up by a lawyer.” While it is unlikely he had the Medicare and Medicaid statutes in mind, there may be no legislation to which his adage better applies. The present dispute

705 F.Supp.2d 905 (2010) ST. THOMAS HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. No. 3:08-1041. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. March 31, 2010. *907 John M. Scannapieco, Martha L. Boyd, Bradley Ara

845 F.Supp. 894 (1993) SWEDISH HOSPITAL CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donna E. SHALALA[1], Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. C.A. No. 87-3534. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 5, 1993. *895 Margaret Mary Manning, Weissburg & Aronson, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs.</

*873ORDER AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND.........................................................873 A. The Challenged Arizona Act...........................................873 B. The Medicaid Program..........

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The Affordable Care Act mandates coverage for contraceptive services in group health plans that employers must provide their employees. Churches, nonprofit religious organizations, and for-profit corporations owned by deeply religious individuals challenged this mandate as offensive to their religious beliefs. The federal government responded. Recen

607 F.Supp. 635 (1985) SPARTANBURG GENERAL HOSPITAL, Plaintiff, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 7:84-2157-3. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Spartanburg Division. April 26, 1985. *636 *637 Roy McBee Smith, Spartanburg, S.C