Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Advanced Domino, Inc”
Carpaneda v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Eduardo Carpaneda (“Carpaneda”), the plaintiff in this matter, moves for an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 149, section 150 and Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151, section 20. PL’s Pet. Att’y’s Fees & Costs (“PL’s Pet.”), ECF No. 55. Carpaneda brought an action on behalf of him
Lind v. Domino's Pizza LLCpublic domain
Fecteau, J. Plaintiffs Michael Lind and Lisa Bishop, coadministrators of the estate of their son, Corey M. Lind (Corey), appeal from separate and final judgments entered in the Superior Court resolving all claims in favor of the defendants Domino’s Pizza LLC and Domino’s Pizza, Inc., in connection with the plaintiffs’ wrongful death action filed pursuant to G. L. c. 229, § 2.
Ginther v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.public domain
93 S.W.3d 300 (2002) Noble GINTHER, III, and Lisa Ginther, Each Individually and a/n/f Fallon Ginther, Deceased, Appellants, v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC., Appellee. No. 14-01-00648-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 8, 2002. *302 George M. Kirk, Jr., Matthew Sean Parish, Michael Chad Gerke, Houston, for Appell
Matt Luiken v. Domino's Pizza, LLCpublic domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. The district court certified a Rule 23(b)(3) class of about 1,600 Minnesota delivery drivers employed by Domino’s Pizza LLC between March 6, 2006, and February 28, 2010. The drivers allege that, under Minnesota law, a fixed delivery charge that customers paid Domino’s was a gratuity wrongfully withheld from them. This court granted an interlocutory appeal an
Lind v. Domino's Pizza LLCpublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 14-P-928 Appeals Court MICHAEL A. LIND, coadministrator
Domino v. DIDION ETHANOL, LLCpublic domain
670 F.Supp.2d 901 (2009) John DOMINO, Margo Domino, Roger Springman, Leonore Neumann, Veronica Neumann-Thompson, Nicholas Thompson and Yvonne Nehring, Plaintiffs, v. DIDION ETHANOL, LLC, Defendant. No. 09-cv-213-bbc. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. November 23, 2009. *903 Elizabeth Lawton, Midwest Environmental Advo
Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLCpublic domain
Opinion BAXTER, J. Franchising, especially in the fast-food industry, has become a ubiquitous, lucrative, and thriving business model. This contractual arrangement benefits both parties. The franchisor, which sells the right to use its trademark and comprehensive business plan, can expand its enterprise while avoiding the risk and cost of running its own stores. The other party, the franchisee, independently ow
McFarland v. Domino'spublic domain
*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, and rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *****
MEMORANDUM OPINION GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge. Plaintiff, Sabre International Security (“Sabre”), a private Iraqi security company, brings this action against Defendant, Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions, Inc. (“Torres”), a Virginia limited liability company, for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary and trust obligations, unjust en
Bores v. Domino's Pizza LLCpublic domain
489 F.Supp.2d 940 (2007) Kevin BORES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DOMINO'S PIZZA LLC, Defendant. Civ. No. 05-2498 (RHK/JSM). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 31, 2007. *941 J. Michael Dady, Scott E. Korzenowski, Clarence J. Kuhn, Dady & Garner[1], P.A., Thomas W. Pahl, Joseph M. Barnett, Foley & Mansf
SMITH, Circuit Judge. SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc. (“Company”) appeals the district court’s 2 grant of summary judgment affirming an arbitration award in favor of the labor union Communications Workers of America, District 6 (“Union”). The two parties arbitrated a dispute in which the Union requested a pay differential
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Indigo LR, LLC (“Indigo”)- and one of its employees, Chris Eakin, appeal the district court’s 2 dismissal of their claims for breach of contract, negligence, conspiracy, and violations of ERISA and RICO against Advanced Insurance Brokerage of America, also known as Advanced Insurance Administrat
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHARLES A. SHAW, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The motions are fully briefed and ready for decision. For the following reasons, the Court will grant defendant Communications Workers of America, District 6’s (“CWA” or “the union”) summary judgment motion and deny plaintiff SBC Advanced Solutions, Inc.’s (“
Bores v. Domino's Pizza, LLCpublic domain
530 F.3d 671 (2008) Kevin BORES; Jennifer Huber; Christopher McCormick; Blue Earth Enterprises, Inc.; Mid America Pizza, LLC; Rising Dough, Inc.; RJ Inc.; Galleons Inc.; J Triple T, Inc.; FBN, Inc.; Try Our pizza Inc.; M & M Pizza, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, LLC, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-2520. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March
820 F.Supp.2d 62 (2011) SABRE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, Plaintiff, v. TORRES ADVANCED ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 11-806 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 27, 2011. *66 Tennant David Magee, Maggs & McDermott, LLC, Brielle, NJ, Timothy B. Mills, Maggs & McDermott, L
515 F.Supp.2d 565 (2007) CALDON, INC., Plaintiff, v. ADVANCED MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS GROUP, INC., and Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, Defendants. No. CA 04-1951. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. June 7, 2007. *566 *567 *568 Anthony P
Kevin Bores v. Domino's Pizza, LLCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2520 ___________ Kevin Bores; Jennifer Huber; * Christopher McCormick; Blue Earth * Enterprises, Inc.; Mid America Pizza, * LLC; Rising Dough, Inc.; RJ Inc.; * Galleons Inc.; J Triple T, Inc.; FBN, * Inc.; Try Our pizza Inc.; M&M Pizza, *
Bercaw v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.public domain
630 N.E.2d 166 (1994) 258 Ill. App.3d 211 196 Ill.Dec. 469 Danielle N. BERCAW, as Special Adm'r of the Estate of Jason W. Bercaw, Deceased et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC., Defendant (James E. Shipman et al., Defendants-Appellees). No. 2-93-0175. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. February 28, 1994
Queen City Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.public domain
124 F.3d 430 1997-2 Trade Cases P 71,909 QUEEN CITY PIZZA, INC.; Thomas C. Bolger; Scale Pizza,Inc.; Baughans, Inc.; Charles F. Buck; F.M. Pizza, Inc.;Robert S. Bigelow; Blue Earth Enterprises, Inc.; KevinBores; Davis Pizza Enterprises, Inc.; Diane A. Davis;Fisher Pizza, Inc.; James B. Fisher, Jr.; SEPCO, Inc.; S& S Pizza Corp.; G & L Pizza Co.; Stephen D. Gallup;Lugent Piz
Justin Oakley, V. Domino's Pizza Llcpublic domain
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur