⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Adrienne Diane Carter”

District Court, C.D. California · 2011-01-05 · Published · cited 52× · 782 F. Supp. 2d 911; 2011 WL 1114250
782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017-07-28 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 IL App (3d) 150765
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
District Court, S.D. New York · 2002-08-23 · Published · cited 18× · 224 F. Supp. 2d 567; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15761; 2002 WL 1966530
224 F.Supp.2d 567 (2002) THE MARTHA GRAHAM SCHOOL AND DANCE FOUNDATION, INC. and Ronald A. Protas, individually and as Trustee of the Martha Graham Trust Plaintiffs, v. MARTHA GRAHAM CENTER OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE, INC. and MARTHA GRAHAM SCHOOL OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE, INC. Defendants, Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, Intervenor-Defendant. No. 01 CIV. 271(MGC). United States Di
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
People v. Austinpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 2020-11-02 · Published · cited 4× · 2019 IL 123910
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
People v. Austinpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 2019-10-18 · Published · cited 22× · 2019 IL 123910
2019 IL 123910 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 123910) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellant, v. BETHANY AUSTIN, Appellee. Opinion filed October 18, 2019. JUSTICE NE
District Court, E.D. New York · 1989-02-02 · Published · cited 26× · 124 F.R.D. 45; 1989 WL 11580
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SIFTON, District Judge. In this challenge to the voting procedures maintained by the City of New York, plaintiffs have moved to certify a class of voter plaintiffs and a subclass of delegate-candidate plaintiffs. Because plaintiffs have shown the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(2) to be satisfied as to the proposed class, that motion is granted. Because
Ohio Supreme Court · 2002-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 2002 Ohio 3343
[Cite as 07/01/2002 Case Announcements, 2002-Ohio-3343.] The Supreme Court of Ohio CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS July 1, 2002 DISCIPLINARY CASES 2001-0412. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Cleary. Patricia A. Cleary is reinstated to the practice of law. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS 2002-0902. Butcher v. Lewis. Stark App. No. 2001CA00219, 2002-Ohi
Schaefer v. Tannianpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 902 F. Supp. 746; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19700; 1995 WL 590090
CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi
Strauss v. Hortonpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2009-06-17 · Published · cited 65× · 46 Cal. 4th 364
46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999-05-06 · Published · cited 98× · 258 A.D.2d 127; 689 N.Y.S.2d 100
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration statement, which is mailed every two years by the Office of Co
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams