Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-75,634 ADRIAN ESTRADA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON DIRECT APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 2006-CR-2079 IN THE 226 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT BEXAR COUNTY HERVEY , J., delivered the opinion of the Cou

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 12, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00715-CV IN THE INTEREST OF H.P.J., A CHILD On Appeal from the 246th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-27477 MEMORANDUM OPINION Gregory Thomas Josefsberg (“Father

FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NOV 30 2006 STATE OF ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO DIVISION TWO OLIN GENE TAYLOR, ) ) Petitioner, )

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00887-CV Aurora A. RODRIGUEZ, Israel Rodriguez, Edelmiro Romeo Alvarez, Silverio Simon Alvarez, Anita Irma Guerra, Emilio Roman Alvarez, Adrian Alvarez, Teodoro Alvarez, Jr., and Primitivo Alvarez, Appellants

645 N.E.2d 184 (1994) 163 Ill.2d 323 206 Ill.Dec. 179 Richard PEILE et al., Appellees, v. SKELGAS, INC., et al., Appellants. No. 75558. Supreme Court of Illinois. December 22, 1994. *185 Robert W. Wilson and Adrian P. Sulser, Evans & Dixon, Edwardsville, for appellants Skelgas,

642 F.Supp.2d 329 (2009) PURDUE PHARMA PRODUCTS L.P., Napp Pharmaceutical Group Ltd., Biovail Laboratories International, SRL, and Ortho-McNeil, Inc., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-defendants, v. PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., and Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaim-plaintiffs. Civil Action No. 07-255-KAJ. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 14, 2009.

City of Edinburg v. Garces, et al. NUMBER 13-01-00365-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

610 N.E.2d 813 (1993) 242 Ill. App.3d 500 182 Ill.Dec. 944 Richard PEILE and Agnes Peile, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SKELGAS, INC., Skelgas Group, Inc., Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, Phillips Pipe Line Company, and Shell Oil Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 5-92-0040. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District.

Judge TAUBMAN dissenting. I. Introduction The majority reverses the conviction of defendant, Adrian Chavez, for sexual assault-aided and abetted, sexual assault on a child-foree, sexual assault on a child, enticement of a child, and enticement of a child-bodily injury, and concludes that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied challenges for cause to two of three prospective juro

IV. DISCUSSION A. AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. Gilead AIDS Healthcare Foundation previously filed an antitrust action concerning Gilead's TDF- and TAF-based drugs that also sought a declaration of patent invalidity and relief under California and Nevada unfair competition laws. AIDS Healthcare Found. ,

PAINTER, Judge. | defendants, Peerless Indemnity Company (Peerless) and America First Insurance Company (AFI), appeal the trial court’s grant of Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and the denial of their motion for summary judgment, finding that Plaintiffs were insured under both the general liability portion of Defendants’ policies and the uninsured/underinsured portions of the policies, and that the umbrella policy pr

¶1 — Adrian Davis pleaded guilty to one count of delivery of cocaine. After the trial court pronounced a sentence of 47 months confinement, Davis moved to withdraw his guilty plea. The trial court refused to consider the merits of Davis’s motion, concluding that judgment had occurred and CrR 4.2(f) constituted a procedural bar. Davis appeals the trial court’s refusal to consider his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He also appeals the order compelling

ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge Before the Court is another farewell tour in this long-running trademark dispute. Specifically, Plaintiff Commodores Entertainment Company's ("CEC ") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 411 ("SJ Motion ") ) and Defendants Thomas McClary ("McClary ") and Fifth Avenue Entertainment, LLC's ("Fifth Avenue ") response (Doc.

O'ROURKE, Acting P. J. *462Gavin Laird appeals the denial of his motion for expungement of his DNA sample from the state's data bank following a reduction in his conviction to an infraction *317"for all purposes" under Proposition 64. His appeal raises an

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Preliminary Injunction, EOF No. [8] (“Motion”), filed o n February 23, 2016. The Court has carefully considered the Motion, the record in this case, and the applicable law, and is otherwise fully advised. By the instant Motion, Plaintif

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Robert E. Wier, United States Magistrate Judge Movant, Adrian Campbell, is a federal inmate. DE # 131 (Motion), at 1. On May 18, 2016,1 Campbell filed a pro se2 motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as well as a memorandum of law. See id.; DE # 131-1. The United States responded in opposition. DE # 139 (Response).

Filed 7/30/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, G062920 v. (Super. Ct. No. 19NF3137) JEFF ANDREW CHRISTENSEN, OPINION Defendant and Appellant. Appeal from a j

Mark R. Hornak, United States District Judge. The Defendant Mario Nelson Reyes-Romero ("Defendant") was administratively removed from the United States in 2011, and he was discovered back in the United States in 2017 without permission from the necessary officials of the federal government, resulting in his indictment for one count of Reentry of Removed Alien,

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, United States District Judge Presently pending and ready for resolution in this Establishment Clause case is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs American Humanist Association, Steven Lowe, Fred Edwords, and Bishop McNeill. (ECF No. 80).1 Also pending are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Maryland-Nationa