Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Adrian Diaz”
Adrian Diaz v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ADRIAN DIAZ, No. 08-10-00068-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § V.
Adrian Diaz v. Statepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ADRIAN DIAZ, Appellant, V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. §
Batty v. Adrian L. Merton, Inc.public domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: La Dan E. Batty, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his amended complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Batty v. Merton,
(2007) Yanisse ADRIAN-SILVA, Plaintiff, v. MANLEY BERENSON MONTEHIEDRA MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants. Civil. No. 03-1890(FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 13, 2007. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, District Judge. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6), provides that the Court may relieve a party from a
Gonzalez v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Adrian Diaz Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Diaz contends that the Board and the IJ erred in concluding that his departure to Mexico in 1994 interrupted his continuous physical presence in the United States. We have jurisdict
Adrian Wood v. State of Floridapublic domain
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-0276 _____________________________ ADRIAN JAMES WOOD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge. May 8, 2024 PER CURIAM. Adrian James Wood
Adrian Galvez-Bravo v. Merrick B. Garlandpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0239p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ADRIAN IRINEO GALVEZ-BRAVO, │ Pe
Adrian Valadez v. Statepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-17-00161-CR ADRIAN VALADEZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-2160-C1
Adrian Gomez v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00383-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/3/2015 1:31:45 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
Adrian Villa v. Statepublic domain
NO. 12-16-00085-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ADRIAN VILLA, § APPEAL FROM THE 70TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § ECTOR COUNTY, TEXAS M
United States v. Chavezpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Adrian Chavez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 *211U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. According
Commonwealth v. Ortiz-Diaz, A.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 187 MAL 2015 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : :
Diaz v. Spanish Contractorspublic domain
HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge. Jose Diaz ("Plaintiff") fell from a ladder at his place of employment on 27 December 2014, resulting in numerous injuries. The Industrial Commission denied Plaintiff compensation, concluding he was intoxicated at the time of the accident. We affirm the Commission's Opinion and Award. I. Factual and Procedural Background On 12 February 2013, Plaintiff f
Diaz v. Pueblo International, Inc.public domain
PETERSEN, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before this Court on Defendant Pueblo International Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For all of the reasons stated herein, the Motion is Denied. DISCUSSION The issue created by this Motion to Dismiss is whether the recently enacted wrongful discharge statute, 24 V.I.C. § 76 et se
Diaz v. Attorney General of State of Tex.public domain
NYE, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The majority finds that the Attorney General as inter-venor must, absolutely, file a pleading for his intervention to properly commence, reasoning that any other ruling would result in a policy which allows “oral lawsuits.” I find the majority’s concern over the danger of oral lawsuits to be wasted on the facts presented here. I would hold that the Attorney General’s
Diaz v. Pueblo International, Inc.public domain
PETERSEN, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This matter is once again before this Court on Defendant Pueblo International’s Motion to Amend this Court’s Order of March 30, 1988, denying defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Specifically, defendant requests that this Court certify the issue of subject matter jurisdiction for appellate review. The statute governing the certification of an
McBride v. US Bank Home Mortgagepublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Adrian L. McBride appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
People v. Diazpublic domain
Filed 4/10/18 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, F071348 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 1423449) v. TURLOCK HERNAN DIAZ et al.,
People v. Diazpublic domain
Filed 3/20/18 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, F071348 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 1423449) v. TURLOCK HERNAN DIAZ et al., OPINIO
United States v. Benniefieldpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Adrian Lamont Benniefield appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Benniefield, No. 3:09-cr-00055-HEH-l (E.D.Va. Aug. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte