⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Adrian Alonzo, Jr.”

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2026-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00719-CR Luis Alonzo PEREZ, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
REVISED SEPTEMBER 7, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 15, 2012 No. 11-4
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2026-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00705-CR Nathaniel Armed MELENDEZ, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,
Mendez v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018-04-25 · Published · cited 135× · 545 S.W.3d 548
Keasler, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Today we seek to resolve a conflict among the lower courts. Some courts have held that, when a trial court sua sponte issues a defensive jury instruction but fails to apply it to a lesser-included offense, the court commits no error unless the defendant objects.1 Others, including the First
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006-07-11 · Published · cited 56× · 455 F.3d 248; 70 Fed. R. Serv. 687; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17303; 2006 WL 1891792
WIDENER, Circuit Judge, concurring and dissenting: This ease presents the consolidated appeals of defendants Sean Thomas Sullivan and Kenneth Adrian Campbell. Sullivan and Campbell were convicted on a number of charges related to their involvement in a criminal drug conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, commonly known as crack, which took place in and near Beaufort County, So
Joyce v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984-05-16 · Published · cited 1× · 474 A.2d 1369; 59 Md. App. 237; 1984 Md. App. LEXIS 373
59 Md. App. 237 (1984) 474 A.2d 1369 ADRIAN ALONZO JOYCE v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1193, September Term, 1983. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 16, 1984. Ellen Luff, Annapolis, with whom was Gill Cochran, Annapolis, on the brief, for appellant. Ann E. Singleton, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom was Stephen H. Sachs, Atty. Gen. of M
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011-11-18 · Published · cited 0×
*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Decision and Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Donovan and the assignments of error and briefs before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. Accordingly, the Full Commission reverses the Decision and Order of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The
Harrington v. Wallpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011-05-17 · Published · cited 7× · 710 S.E.2d 364; 212 N.C. App. 25; 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 948
McGEE, Judge. Elizabeth Harrington (Plaintiff) commenced this action by filing a complaint on 6 January 2009, seeking child support and custody of a child born to Plaintiff and Adrian Wall (Defendant). Defendant was served on 7 January 2009, but he failed to timely file any responsive pleadings. Plaintiff moved for entry of default on 24 February 2009, and the Clerk of Superior Court entered default the same day Defendant reta
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2014-10-13 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-13-00054-CR ANTHONY ALONSO FLORES, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 64th District Court Castro County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2007-12-06 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 6, 2007 In The Court of Appeals For The Firs
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002-01-08 · Published · cited 4× · 213 F. Supp. 2d 710; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20536; 2002 WL 1791125
213 F.Supp.2d 710 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. Javier MALDONADO. No. CRIM. NO. L-01-1101. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Laredo Division. January 8, 2002. *711 *712 *713 Javier Maldonado, In Custody, pro se. Carlos David Castillon, F
New York Court of Appeals · 1954-12-31 · Published · cited 0× · 308 N.Y. 704; 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 1806; 124 N.E.2d 329
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Lewis, Ch. J., Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voobhis, JJ.
New York Supreme Court · 1954-02-16 · Published · cited 1× · 205 Misc. 909; 131 N.Y.S.2d 587; 1954 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3342
Schreiber, J. This is a motion by a teacher-member of respondent, teachers’ retirement board, and by a retired teacher who is a beneficiary of the teachers ’ retirement system, to restrain the board from signing and issuing warrants for the payment of administrative salaries and expenses from the expense fund of the system and to restrain Lawrence E. Grerosa, comptroller of the City of New York, from making payments from said exp
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 03-4601 SEAN THOMAS SULLIVAN, a/k/a Rico, Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-11-25 · Published · cited 23× · 350 F.3d 1216; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23944
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
Van Sickle v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980-09-10 · Published · cited 16× · 604 S.W.2d 93; 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1324
604 S.W.2d 93 (1979) Archie T. VAN SICKLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 57009. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 1. June 27, 1979. On Rehearing September 10, 1980. *94 Van A. Hutchins, on appeal only, Alamo, for appellant. Charles R. Borchers, Dist. Atty., Donato D. Ramos, Fi
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-06-07 · Published · cited 105× · 650 F.3d 350; 2011 WL 2207110
650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-07-05 · Published · cited 2× · 262 F. Supp. 3d 1165
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Bench Trial on Plaintiffs’ First Through Fourth Claims for Relief, and Brief in Support, filed February 17, 2017 (Doc. 253)(“Motion for Bench Trial”). The Court held a hearing on April 26-27, 2017, The primary issues are whether: (i) the Plaintiffs’ breach-of-fiduciary-
United States Tax Court · 1997-12-22 · Published · cited 9× · 109 T.C. 423; 1997 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 73; 109 T.C. No. 20
Gerber, Judge: Respondent issued notices of final partnership administrative adjustment to P.D.B. Sports, Ltd., for the taxable years 1989 and 1990. Among other adjustments, respondent disallowed amortization in the amounts of $1,878,056 and $259,255 for 1989 and 1990, respectively, claimed with respect to professional football player contracts. After concessions, the sole issue remaining for
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006-07-21 · Published · cited 113× · 455 F.3d 336; 372 U.S. App. D.C. 251; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18361; 2006 WL 2034361
Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM. The five appellants challenge their convictions and sentences on various counts of *339 criminal activity involving drugs, guns and violence. For the reasons set out below, we affirm their convictions and their sentences