Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Adolphus M Grant”
U.S. Bank National Association v. Grantpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 14-467 (RDM) ADOLPHUS M. GRANT, et al., Defendants. CONSENT ORDER AND DECREE OF SALE Upon consideration of Plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage, LLC’s motion for appointment of substitute trustee, Dkt. 2
500 P.3d 1075The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-
Cooper v. Gustavus Adolphus Collegepublic domain
957 F.Supp. 191 (1997) Jennifer COOPER, Plaintiff, v. GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE and Karle Erickson, Defendants. Civil No. 4-95-684. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. March 28, 1997. *192 Susan M. Robiner and Daniel L. Palmquist, Leonard Street & Deinard, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant Gustavus Adolp
Henry Adolphus Thompson v. Commonwealth of Virginiapublic domain
BRAY, Judge. Henry Adolphus Thompson (defendant) was convicted in a bench trial for reckless driving and feloniously driving after having been adjudicated an habitual offender, violations of Code §§ 46.2-852 and 46.2-357(B)(2), respectively. On appeal, defendant complains that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions.
714 A.2d 802 (1998) 1998 ME 173 GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE, et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs April 16, 1998. Decided July 14, 1998. Richard G. Cervizzi, Scarborough, for plaintiffs. Eugene W. Murray, Legal Division, Department of Transportation, Augusta, for defendant. B
People v. Adolphus T.public domain
Opinion PARAS, J. A minor asks us to set aside the judgment committing him to the California Youth Authority and to grant new jurisdictional and dispositional hearings. The 17-year-old (born Dec. 11, 1961) minor was taken into custody on June 27, 1978; a petition to declare him a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) was filed on June 29. Three counts of armed robbery (Pen. Code,
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00365-CV ___________________________ ESPERANZA MARTINEZ, Appellant V. ACA TEAM, LLC; UNIVERSAL DISPLAY & FIXTURES COMPANY; LUIS BARBERO; JOE BATTAGLIA; FRANCISCO DE JESUS; JESSICA GUERRA; SHAWN KERNS; AND
Criminal Case Template COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JULIA FERIA, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
State v. James Caleb Williamspublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Petitioner, v. James Caleb Williams, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2021-001493 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Sumter County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28157 Heard March 8, 202
N.B. v. Jamesonpublic domain
N.B. v Jameson (2023 NY Slip Op 03326) N.B. v Jameson 2023 NY Slip Op 03326 Decided on June 21, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
United States v. Blackpublic domain
M. Hannah Lauck, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Adolphus Black's Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018 (the "Motion"). (ECF No. 154.) Black asserts that the First Step Act entitles him to relief because he committed a covered offense before August 3, 2010. (Mot. 1-3.) The United States responded, recognizing that the First Step Act applies to Black but disputin
United States v. Nickleberrypublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS Judge Jill N. Parrish, United States District Court Judge INTRODUCTION Defendant Adolphus Niekleberry filed a Motion to Suppress on November 12, 2015. (Docket 18). The court held an evidentiary hearing on November 30, 2015. The parties then briefed the motion and the court heard oral argument on January 13, 2016. S
Moore v. Nizampublic domain
Moore v Nizam (2021 NY Slip Op 01946) Moore v Nizam 2021 NY Slip Op 01946 Decided on March 30, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<
State v. Pinckneypublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v
Smith v. Grantpublic domain
This appeal is from a suit that originated as a declaratory judgment action. Invalidation of a written contract pertaining to the sale and purchase of real estate was the original objective. The appellees were plaintiffs in the trial court. The appellants, one as an intervenor and the remainder as defendants, answered the original petition and filed a cross-action praying judgment for specific performance of the written agreement, for relief associated therewith, and additionally on t
United States v. Robert M. Lealpublic domain
BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Robert Leal, a pharmacist convicted of 16 counts of violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for running a “pill mill,” appeals from his conviction and sentencing on a host of grounds. We find all of Leal’s arguments without merit and affirm Leal’s conviction for the reasons given below. I Leal was charged with 87 count
United States v. El Rancho Adolphus Products, Inc.public domain
140 F.Supp. 645 (1956) UNITED STATES of America v. EL RANCHO ADOLPHUS PRODUCTS, Inc., a Corporation; Scientific Living, Inc., a Corporation; and Adolphus Hohensee, an Individual. Cr. No. 12529. United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania. April 19, 1956. *646 *647 J. Julius Levy, U. S. Att
United States v. Adamspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. No. 21-cr-212-ZMF JARED HUNTER ADAMS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Courts must be especially vigilant in protecting indigent defendants’ right to a fair trial. This includes the provision of travel, shelter, and food
*752 TUTTLE, Circuit Judge: The principal, and only serious, contention made by Sams on his appeal from a conviction and sentence for falsely forging a United States Government check in violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 495, deals with the manner in which the
State v. Bakerpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Mark Baker, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2010-172951 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Sumter County The Honorable Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 27497 Heard November 15, 2012 – Filed February 11, 2015