Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Adobe Systems Incorporated v. NA Tech Direct, Inc.”
Tecsec, Inc. v. Adobe Inc.public domain
Case: 19-2192 Document: 60 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TECSEC, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ADOBE INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant SAS INSTITUTE, INC., SAP AMERICA, INC., SAP AG, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., SYBASE, INC., SOFTWARE AG, SOFTWARE AG, INC., ORACLE CORPORATIO
Select Building Systems, Inc. and Tri-Bar Ranch Company, Ltd. v. Robertson Electric, Inc.public domain
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
Kropp Holdings, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-2155 (Filed Under Seal: May 9, 2025) Reissued: May 28, 2025 ∗ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * KROPP HOLDINGS, INC., * * Plaintiff, * *
Kropp Holdings, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-2155 (Filed Under Seal: May 9, 2025) Reissued: May 28, 2025 ∗ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * KROPP HOLDINGS, INC., * * Plaintiff, * *
Trustees of Columbia University v. Gen Digital Inc.public domain
Case: 24-1243 Document: 132 Page: 1 Filed: 03/11/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GEN DIGITAL INC., FKA SYMANTEC CORPORATION, FKA NORTONLIFELOCK, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2024-1243
In re Carrier IQ, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 304) EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs in this multidistrict litigation— eighteen (18) individuals from thirteen different states — have filed a second consolidated amended complaint (“SCAC” or
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiff, Victor Stanley, Inc. (“VSI” or “Plaintiff’) filed a motion seeking a ruling that five categories of electronically stored documents produced by defendants Creative Pipe, Inc. (“CPI”) and Mark and Stephanie Pappas (“M. Pappas”, “S. Pappas” or “The Pappasses”) (collectively, “Defendants”) in October, 2007, are not
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ERIC DOUGLAS GUILBEAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. 2024-0968-JTL FOOTPRINT INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO, INC., CLEVELAND AVENUE, LLC, FOOTPRINT CA LLC, CA OPPORTUNITY FUND I LLC, CLEVELAND MANOR INVESTMENTS II LLC, CA FOOD I FUND LLC, OLYMPUS GROWTH FUND VII, L.P., OLYMPUS GROWTH FUND VII PARALLEL, L.P., MOVENDO CAPITAL, B.V., ZENCAP HOLDINGS FP, LLC, DON THOMPSON, MANU BETTEGOWDA,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Saris, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Photographic Illustrators Corporation (PIC) brought this action against A.W. Graham Lumber, LLC (Graham), alleging copyright infringement in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 501 (Count I); removal of copyright maintenance information in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1202 (Count II); and violations of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A (Count
Simio, LLC v. Flexsim Software Productspublic domain
Case: 20-1171 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 12/29/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SIMIO, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FLEXSIM SOFTWARE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2020-1171 ______________________ Appeal from the United St
Meadows v. Hartford Life Insurancepublic domain
429 F.Supp.2d 853 (2006) David MEADOWS, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Hartford Life Private Placement, L.L.C., the Newport Group, Inc., Henry F. McCamish, Jr., McCamish Group, L.P., McCamish Systems, L.L.C., Integrated Administration Services, Inc., and IAS Development Corporation, Defendants. No. CIV.A.H-05-2209. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.
Faulkner v. National Geographic Societypublic domain
211 F.Supp.2d 450 (2002) Douglas FAULKNER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY, et al., Defendants. David Hiser, et al., Plaintiffs, v. National Geographic Society, et al., Defendants. Nos. 97CIV.09361LAK, 99CIV.12488LAK. United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 13, 2002. *451
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, United States Bankruptcy Judge THIS MATTER is before the Court following an eleven-day trial on the merits of the corporate liability phase of this litigation. The United Tort Claimants (the “UTC”)1 and Quorum Health Resources, LLC (“QHR”) were represented by counsel as noted on the record. This case s
Pueblo of Laguna v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER ALLEGRA, Judge. In this case, the Pueblo of Laguna tribe seeks an accounting and to recover for monetary loss and damages relating to the government’s alleged mismanagement of the tribe’s trust funds and other properties, including royalties from the exploitation of uranium ore reserves on the tribe’s New Mexico reservation. This case is one of several such cases before the court, including Jica
Texas Department of Agriculture v. Shelia Lattingpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-17-00603-CV 21640024 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.public domain
ORDER RE: 1) MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; 2) MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT COLLECTIVE ACTION; AND 3) MOTION TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS’ EXPERT DECLARATION AND TESTIMONY JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, Plaintiffs are minor league baseball players who assert *530
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Goldstonepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of PCAOB Deposition Transcripts and Plaintiffs Notes and Memoranda of Interviews with Non-Party Witnesses, filed November 28, 2012 (Doc. 90) (“Motion to Compel”);2 (ii) Non-Party KPMG L
ACCEPTED 15-25-00084-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/3/2025 3:01 PM No. 15-25-00084-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 07-14-00014-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 3/26/2015 11:02:26 PM
McConnell v. Federal Election Commissionpublic domain
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. “To an imagination of any scope the most far-reaching form of power is not money, it is the command of ideas.” —Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457, 478 (1897). I believe the statute before us is unconstitu