⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Adler v. Solar Power, Inc.”

District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 391 F. Supp. 3d 303
LOUIS L. STANTON, U.S.D.J. The issues for resolution by this trial following Judge Swain's rulings by summary judgment, are the determination of a proper discount for the restricted nature of SPI's grants to Mr. Adler of SPI stock (a six-month holding period), and the valuation of Plaintiff's claimed ten percent share in the proposed Management LLC project. 1. Various methods of determining the disc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-09-24 · Published · cited 1× · 126 F.3d 1158
THOMAS, Circuit Judge: Confronted by unprecedented market pressures, the Bonneville Power Administration (“BPA”) undertook a searching re-examination of its business strategy. As a result, BPA proposed profound alterations in its relationships with certain large industrial customers. At issue in this consolidated appeal are the administrative decisions effecting the transition, which are challenged by a number of widely div
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-09-19 · Published · cited 16× · 338 F. Supp. 3d 326
VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Blue Citi LLC has sued Defendant 5Barz International, Inc. for specific performance, breach of contract, conversion, and attorneys' fees. See Compl., Dkt. 1. In an order dated August 28, 2017 (the "Prior Order"), the Court granted Plaintiff summary judgment on its claim for specific performance and awarded Plaintiff attorneys' fees. See Prior Order, Dkt. 54.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2014-11-24 · Published · cited 0× · 520 B.R. 316; 2014 WL 6844698
Chapter 7 ORDER GRANTING MOTION, AS AMENDED, OF CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE: TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AND COMPROMISE OF CONTROVERSY WITH ELSA SUNG AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF A BAR ORDER [D.E. 101, 135] AND DENYING THE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY [D.E. 87] Raymond B. Ray, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court THIS MATTER came before the Court for evidentiary hearing on September 19, 2014, upon
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011-02-16 · Published · cited 3× · 771 F. Supp. 2d 382; 2011 WL 675960; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15440
771 F.Supp.2d 382 (2011) MFS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Thomas A. DiLAZARO, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-2508. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 16, 2011. *386 Thomas J. Zagami, Hodes, Ulman, Pessin & Katz, P.A., Columbia, MD, Wayne C. Stansfield, Brooke N. Wallace, Reed Smith LLP, Philadelphia, P
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2018-02-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VERITION PARTNERS MASTER FUND ) LTD. and VERITION MULTI-STRATEGY ) MASTER FUND LTD., ) ) Petitioners, ) v. ) C.A. No. 11448-VCL ) ARUBA NETWORKS, INC., )
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-10-19 · Published · cited 4× · 209 A.D.3d 854; 177 N.Y.S.3d 257; 2022 NY Slip Op 05847
Matter of Affiliated Brookhaven Civic Orgs., Inc. v Planning Bd. of the Town of Brookhaven (2022 NY Slip Op 05847) Matter of Affiliated Brookhaven Civic Orgs., Inc. v Planning Bd. of the Town of Brookhaven 2022 NY Slip Op 05847 Decided on October 19, 2022 Appellate Division,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-03-11 · Published · cited 18× · 786 F. Supp. 2d 758; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25154; 2011 WL 867274
786 F.Supp.2d 758 (2011) AMUSEMENT INDUSTRY, INC., etc., at ano., Plaintiffs, v. Moses STERN, et al., Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 11586(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 11, 2011. *765 Allen Phillip Sragow, Sragow & Sragow, Craig Harry Missakian, Westland Industries, Inc., Long Beach, CA, John Werner Hofsae
District Court, E.D. New York · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 2× · 147 F. Supp. 3d 63; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159485; 2015 WL 7575908
OPINION & ORDER Feuerstein, United States District Judge I. Introduction On January 9, 2015, plaintiff EDF Renewable Development, Inc. (“plaintiff’) commenced this action against defendant Tritec Real Estate Co., Inc. (“defendant”) pursuant to this Court’s diversity of citizenship jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.. § 1332(a), seeking, inter alia, damages for defendant’s purported tortious interferenc
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-08-13 · Published · cited 3× · 651 F. Supp. 2d 51; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71548; 2009 WL 2482138
651 F.Supp.2d 51 (2009) CONERGY AG, Plaintiff, v. MEMC ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, INC. and MEMC Singapore Pte. Ltd., Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 4906(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 13, 2009. *53 Derek J.T. Adler, Esq., Erik B. Bond, Esq., Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York, NY, for Conergy. William J
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005-05-11 · Published · cited 8× · 369 F. Supp. 2d 204; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8826; 2005 WL 1120294
369 F.Supp.2d 204 (2005) Joel ROSEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TEXTRON, INC., Lewis B. Campbell, John A. Janitz, and Theodore R. French, Defendants. Leslie Turbowitz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Textron, Inc., Lewis B. Campbell, John A. Janitz, and Theodore R. French, Defendants. C.A. No. 02-190-S, C.A. No. 02-264-S.
Indiana Supreme Court · 2023-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Jun 30 2023, 9:57 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2010-06-15 · Published · cited 17× · 449 B.R. 42; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 5202; 2010 WL 6501984
449 B.R. 42 (2011) In re Joseph W. JANSSENS, III, Debtor. Freedom Medical, Inc., Plaintiff v. Joseph W. Janssens, III, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-23222-JS. Adversary No. 08-0225-JS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland. June 15, 2010. *52 Charles Frederick Obrecht, Jr., Esquire, Obrecht and Obrecht, Severna Park, MD,
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001-10-01 · Published · cited 44× · 183 F. Supp. 2d 860; 2001 WL 1739999
183 F.Supp.2d 860 (2001) In re SECURITIES LITIGATION BMC SOFTWARE, INC. No. H-00-0359. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. October 1, 2001. *861 *862 *863 David E. Sharp, Roger B. Greenberg, Greenberg Peden et al., Thomas E. Bilek, Hoeffner
District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997-03-21 · Published · cited 8× · 172 F.R.D. 200; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4777; 1997 WL 148018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KAPLAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs Richard Manson, Simon Sinnreich, Solomon Chazan and Avrimin Kogan have filed a motion to certify this securities *203fraud case as a class action.1 The proposed class consists of “all persons and entities who purchased the common
Association of Public Agency Customers, Inc. v. Bonneville Power Administration, Aluminum Company of America Elf Atochem North America Columbia Aluminum Corporation Columbia Falls Aluminum Company Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Intalco Aluminum Corporation Northwest Aluminum Company Reynolds Metals Company Vanalco Incorporated, Respondents-Intervenors. Utility Reform Project Kevin Bell v. Bonneville Power Administration, Association of Public Agency Customers, Inc., an Unincorporated Association v. Bonneville Power Administration, Utility Reform Project Kevin Bell v. Bonneville Power Administration, Aluminum Company of America Elf Atochem North America Columbia Aluminum Corporation Columbia Falls Aluminum Company Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Intalco Aluminum Corporation Northwest Aluminum Company Reynolds Metals Company Vanalco Incorporated, Respondents-Intervenors. Association of Public Agency Customers, Inc., an Unincorporated Association, Northwest Conservation Act Coalition, Petitioner-Intervenor v. Bonneville Power Administration, Aluminum Company of America Elf Atochem North America Columbia Aluminum Corporation Columbia Falls Aluminum Company Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Intalco Aluminum Corporation Northwest Aluminum Company Reynolds Metals Company Vanalco Incorporated, Respondents-Intervenors. Public Power Council, Northwest Conservation Act Coalition, Petitioner-Intervenor v. Bonneville Power Administration, Aluminum Company of America Elf Atochem North America Columbia Aluminum Corporation Columbia Falls Aluminum Company Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Intalco Aluminum Corporation Northwest Aluminum Company Reynolds Aluminum Reynolds Metals Company Vanalco Incorporated, Respondents-Intervenorspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-09-24 · Published · cited 82× · 126 F.3d 1158; 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7575; 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20141; 97 Daily Journal DAR 12217; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 26278
126 F.3d 1158 Util. L. Rep. P 14,176, Util. L. Rep. P 14,177,28 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,141,97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7575,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,209 ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AGENCY CUSTOMERS, INC., Petitioner,v.BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Respondent,Aluminum Company Of America; Elf Atochem North America;Columbia Aluminum Corporation; Columbia Falls AluminumCompany; Kaiser Aluminum &
District Court, E.D. New York · 1997-12-17 · Published · cited 19× · 990 F. Supp. 119; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21147; 1997 WL 812257
990 F.Supp. 119 (1997) INFLIGHT NEWSPAPERS, INC., and Inflight Advertising, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. MAGAZINES IN-FLIGHT, LLC, Magazines In-Flight, Inc., Marc Passarelli, Stephen Sergi, James Newton, Jody Dykstra, Elise Antonelli, Scott T. Guido, Edgar Escobar, Elvis Bran and Jan Kuliwoski, Defendants. No. 97-CV-5933 (JS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 17, 1
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989-11-20 · Published · cited 37× · 565 A.2d 1265; 1989 R.I. LEXIS 156; 1989 WL 138758
565 A.2d 1265 (1989) EASTERN MOTOR INNS, INC. v. Armand RICCI and Shirley Ricci. No. 88-509-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. November 20, 1989. *1267 Lauren E. Jones, Jones & Aisenberg, Joseph A. Kelly, Marc DeSisto, Carroll, Kelly & Murphy, Providence, David F. Sweeney, Breslin, Sweeney & Earle, Warwick, for pl
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982-08-20 · Published · cited 17× · 441 N.E.2d 1163; 110 Ill. App. 3d 88; 65 Ill. Dec. 649; 1982 Ill. App. LEXIS 2418
110 Ill. App.3d 88 (1982) 441 N.E.2d 1163 UNITED NUCLEAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 81-264. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (5th Division). Opinion filed August 20, 1982. *89 *90 Francis J. Hig
District Court, D. Kansas · 2016-03-02 · Published · cited 14× · 168 F. Supp. 3d 1334; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26480; 2016 WL 827753
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation (“Cargill”) filed suit against Defendants Premium Beef Feeders, LLC and Power Plus Beef Feeders, LLC. Cargill alleges breach of contract arising from the parties’ Cattle Procurement and Feeding Agreement. The Defendants’ answer included two counterclaims. In relevant part, Defendants’ Count I allege