Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3385 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Dionandre Ganter llllllll

Rule 23 order filed NO. 5-07-0002 February 15, 2008; Motion to publish granted IN THE March 24, 2008. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _________________________________________________________________________ ALBERT TRTANJ and MARY TRTANJ, ) Appeal from the for the Use of STATE FARM FIRE AND ) Circuit Court of CASUALTY COMPANY, ) Madison County.

By the Court, Bacon, J. The action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the non-delivery of grain, upon a contract entered into in May, 1846, and subsequently modified by parol, as alleged, between Adison Gardner and the defendant. The grain was to be delivered in the fall of 1846 and 1847. The cause of action was assigned by Adison Gardner to Nathan F. Graves, by or

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 401 It is quite certain that the judge at the circuit erred in supposing that, by including a defence upon the merits in the same answer with the defence of a former suit pending for the same cause of action, the defendant had waived the latter defence. A doubt at one time existed, whether the Code had abrogated the r

This is a will contest. The action was tried in the district court of Taylor County, Texas, after an appeal thereto from the county court of such county. J. E. Adison died in Taylor County, Texas, on December 18, 1935, leaving a written will executed on the day of his death. By the terms of this will the deceased (1) provided for the payment of his just debts and funeral expenses; (2) bequeathed to his niece, Mrs. Ida McKibban, the sum of $500.00; (3) bequeathed to his friend, Sid Cris

Constitutionality of South African Divestment Statutes Enacted by State and Local Governments In response to conditions in South Africa, a number of state and local governments passed statutes or ordinances requiring the divestment o f pension funds from companies that do business in South Africa or prohibiting governmental bodies from entering into contracts with such companies. The divestm ent laws survive constitutional scrutiny. The divestment laws do not place a

The Legislative Veto and Congressional Review of Agency Rules [The following testimony discusses the constitutional objections to legislative vetoes, w hich are grounded in principles o f presentation, bicameralism, and separation of powers. The testimony also describes and responds to several theories advanced in support o f the constitutionality o f legislative vetoes. Finally, it outlines the Reagan Administration’s policy objections to legisla

USCA11 Case: 23-10385 Document: 112-1 Date Filed: 03/12/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10385 ____________________ JANUARY LITTLEJOHN, JEFFREY LITTL

Mr. Justice Neil delivered the opinion of the Court. The plaintiff in error was indicted in the circuit court of McMinn county for the murder of one Elbert Watten-barger, was convicted of murder in the first degree, and ivas sentenced to confinement in the State penitentiary *367for the term of his natural life. From this judgment he has appealed, and

The President’s Veto Power A rticle I o f the C onstitution does not v e s t the President w ith the inherent pow er to veto portions o f a bill w hile signing the rem ainder o f it into law. July 8, 1988 M em orandum O p in io n fo r t h e A ttorney G eneral In the past few months, several commentators have suggested that

STORY, Circuit Justice.- This is a libel brought in the district court upon a policy of insurance, alleging it to be a maritime contract, of which that court, as a court of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, has cognizance. There is a plea to the jurisdiction, and the present question rests solely on the general sufficiency of that plea as a declina-tory bar. It has been argued, and now stands for judgment. I shall make no ap