Cases

BENHAM, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent because I believe State Farm is not entitled to a credit for the amount Nationwide paid Grady Hospital for its treatment of the injuries Mr. Adams sustained due to the negligent acts of the tortfeasor. OCGA § 33-7-11 (b) (1) (D) (ii) (2000) provides in pertinent part: . . . [Ajvailable coverages under the bodily injury liability insu

707 S.E.2d 928 (2011) ADAMS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. No. A08A2315. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 18, 2011. Chambers, Aholt & Rickard, Clyde E. Rickard III, Atlanta, for appellant. Harper, Waldon & Craig, Russell D. Waldon, Atlanta, Kimberly A. McNamara, William M. Cheves, Jr., Jane N. Wilkes, Atlanta, Ryan A. Johnson, Covingt

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge, dissenting. I agree with the trial court that State Farm was entitled to set off its $100,000 UM coverage by the full $25,000 paid from the tortfea-sor’s liability policy. I, therefore, respectfully dissent from the majority’s position. Adams’ election to voluntarily divert part of the $25,000 liability payment to satisfy his hospital bill did not reduce the available liability coverage

264 S.W.3d 424 (2008) Weston ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 05-06-00006-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 25, 2008. Rehearing Overruled September 29, 2008. *426 Carl David Adams, The Law Offices of Carl David Adams, Dallas, for appellant. J. M

BRETT LIRETTE * NO. 2023-CA-0377 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JASON C. ADAMS, STATE * FARM MUTUAL FOURTH CIRCUIT AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE * COMPANY, GEICO STATE OF LOUISIANA CASUALTY COMPANY & ******* AXIS VENTURES, LLC CONSOLIDATED WITH:

BRETT LIRETTE * NO. 2023-CA-0527 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JASON C. ADAMS, STATE * FARM MUTUAL FOURTH CIRCUIT AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE * COMPANY, GEICO STATE OF LOUISIANA CASUALTY COMPANY & ******* AXIS VENTURES, LLC CONSOLIDATED WITH:

BRETT LIRETTE * NO. 2022-CA-0552 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL JASON C. ADAMS, STATE * FARM MUTUAL FOURTH CIRCUIT AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE * COMPANY, GEICO STATE OF LOUISIANA CASUALTY COMPANY & ******* AXIS VENTURES, LLC CONSOLIDATED WITH:

CORRECTED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS1 LÚCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Melissa Landucci (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendants State Farm Insurance Company (“State Farm”), David Colker, and Does 1 through 25 (collectively, “Defendants”). Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs third through seventh cau

ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. _J_jThis is an insurance agent negligence case coupled with an insurance coverage dispute. The insured, Edward Collins, brought this suit against his insurer, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”),1 and his insurance agent, Reggie Glass. From the trial court’s judgment granting Mr. Glass’ motion for summary judgment. Mr. Collins appeals. For the reasons that

ENTRY ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT YOUNG, District Judge. Plaintiffs filed this declaratory judgment action requesting the court to declare and determine that they be allowed to “stack” the underinsured motorist coverage on vehicles owned by State Farm Mutual Insurance Company’s (“State Farm”) insured, Donald and Brenda Horning. Presently before the court is State Farm’s Mo

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated February 13, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed. It is u

*854SALARIO, Judge. State Farm ‘ Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals a- final judgment holding it liable to Adam Smith for $150,000 pursuant to the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile insurance policy^ Resolution of the appeal hinges on two legal questions: (1) whether the policy by its terms extends uninsured motorist coverage to Smith and, if it doe

Ray, Judge. Angela Reaves, as executrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Timothy Reaves, appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com*427pany (“State Farm”) on her claims for her own loss of consortium and her late husband’s injuries. At issue is whether Reaves has met the statutory requirements of OCGA §

KELLY, Judge. Renee Bush appeals from the final summary judgment rendered in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). 1 In light of the supreme court’s recent decision in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran, 135 So.3d 1071 (Fla.2014), we reverse and reman

SLEET, Judge. James Motzenbecker, Elizabeth Motzen-becker, Chelsea Ackermecht, and Adam Smith (collectively the “Appellants”) appeal a final summary judgment in favor of State Farm arising from State Farm’s request for declaratory judgment. Appellants argue that the trial court improperly granted final summary judgment for State Farm because the household-exclusion provision of the automobile insurance poli

675 F.3d 989 (2012) Pamela ARMISTED, Guardian of J.B.; J.B., a minor, by Pamela Armisted, Guardian; Kathleen Chauvin, Parent and Guardian of Joseph Chauvin; Joseph Chauvin; Jerry Wagner, Brother and Guardian of Leslie Stewart; Leslie Stewart; Harold Adams, Guardian of Joshua Adams; Eileen Adams, Guardian of Joshua Adams; Joshua Adams; Gary Parks, Guardian of Towanda Parks; Towanda Parks, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL

629 S.E.2d 424 (2006) 278 Ga. App. 655 CRANE v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY. No. A06A0133. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 9, 2006. Reconsideration Denied April 5, 2006. Certiorari Denied July 13, 2006. *425 Eugene Crane, pro se. Gary M. Cooper, Cooper & Mak

PRESIDING JUSTICE GARCIA delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justices McBride and R.E. Gordon concurred in the judgment and opinion. OPINION The circuit court granted summary judgment to defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Com

Order GREGORY A. PRESNELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Cozurt on motions to dismiss (Doc. 89, 90, 92) filed by various groups of Defendants, the response in opposition (Doc. 98) to those motions filed by the Plaintiffs, and the replies (Doc. 99, 101, 103, 104) filed by the movants. The portions of those motions having to do with the Plaintiffs’ state law claims have been re

921 N.E.2d 458 (2009) Gerald RYAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-09-0553. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. December 28, 2009. *459 Gordon & Centracchio, LLC (Joseph G. Ryan and Beth Schillen, of counsel), Chicago, IL, for appellant