Cases

BLACK, Circuit Judge: Appellant Bradley Seff filed this class action lawsuit, alleging that Appellee Bro-ward County’s (Broward’s) employee wellness program violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. The district court granted Broward’s motion for summary judgment, finding the employee wellness program fell within the

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CHRISTINE SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RONALD DESANTIS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE, LAUREL LEE, FLORIDA DIVISION OF ELECTIONS, MARIA MATTHEWS, ASHLEY DAVIS, COLLEEN O'BRIEN, KRISTI WILLIS, CANDICE D. EDWARDS, BROWARD COUNTY, NATHANIEL KLITSBERG, BROWARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS

*414 GROSS, J. This case is a tug of war between Broward County’s property appraiser, a constitutional officer, and the Board of County Commissioners. The Board wants to have as much control over its budget as possible; the property appraiser believes that the Board’s discretion over her

778 F.Supp.2d 1370 (2011) Bradley SEFF, Plaintiff, v. BROWARD COUNTY, Defendant. Case No. 10-61437-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 11, 2011. *1371 Adam S. Chotiner, Daniel R. Levine, Robin I. Frank, Shapiro Blasi Wasserman & Gora PA, Boca Raton, FL, for Plaintiff. Benjamin Salzillo, James David R

USCA11 Case: 18-13592 Document: 304-1 Date Filed: 12/30/2022 Page: 1 of 150 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-13592 ____________________ DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and th

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ANNIS ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D18-3522 [March 5, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Marina Ga

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT SHERARD ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-966 [July 24, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-5096 _____________________________ KANTER REAL ESTATE, LLC, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, CITY OF MIRAMAR, and BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Noah Valenste

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-5096 _____________________________ KANTER REAL ESTATE, LLC, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, CITY OF MIRAMAR, and BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Noah Valenstein

PER CURIAM. The chief judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit for Broward County issued an administrative order providing for a one-time automatic continuance of a traffic or misdemean- or case upon the payment of a $25 reset fee. Broward County enacted an ordinance which implemented the chief judge’s administrative order. Appellee filed a class action suit challenging the validity of the order and ordinance. The trial cou

SASSO, J. *369Petitioner, Raymond Adams, seeks second-tier certiorari review of final disciplinary action by the Department of Corrections. We deny the petition for writ of certiorari, concluding that even if the circuit court's reason for denying the petition was incorrect, it reached the correct result because Petitioner could not demonstrate

SASSO, J. *369Petitioner, Raymond Adams, seeks second-tier certiorari review of final disciplinary action by the Department of Corrections. We deny the petition for writ of certiorari, concluding that even if the circuit court's reason for denying the petition was incorrect, it reached the correct result because Petitioner could not demonstrate

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA and TOWN OF DAVIE, Appellants, v. JAY ADAMS, Appellee. Nos. 4D12-2258 and 4D12-2259 [February 4, 2015] Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circ

37 So.3d 953 (2010) Cedric ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D09-222. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. June 16, 2010. Rhonda F. Goodman of Rhonda F. Goodman, P.A., Miami, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, United States District Judge The parents of St. Johns County, along with teachers and administrators of the St. Johns County School District, have a solemn obligation to guard the well-being of the children in their charge. As recent events from around the country have tragically demonstrated, this is a very challenging job. Recognizing the difficulty of this task and that local school boards, answerable to the

780 So.2d 955 (2001) Cleveland ADAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 4D99-1036, 4D00-333. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 28, 2001. Rehearing Denied April 12, 2001. *956 Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Steven H. Malone, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beac

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC18-67 ____________ CITIZENS FOR STRONG SCHOOLS, INC., et al., Petitioners, vs. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Respondents. January 4, 2019 PER CURIAM. This

KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: My colleagues and I agree that the only way Kathy Adams (Adams) survives summary judgment in favor of the U.S. Department of State (Department) on her Rehabilitation Act claim is under 29 U.S.C. § 705(20)(B)(ii), the “record of impairment” definition of “disability.”1 Applying *955

MEMORANDUM OPINION VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge This case arises from Daniel Acker, Jr.’s horrific twenty-five year practice of exploiting his position as an elementary school teacher to convert the Shelby County school system into his personal sexual hunting ground. It is an action under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1681-88), 42 U.S'.C

The record and the briefs in this case have been examined. We find that Broward Drainage District, the appellee, was created by Chapter 8871, Acts of 1921, later amended by Chapter 10117, Act sof 1925, Chapter 11862, Acts of 1927, and Chapter 18037, Acts of 1937, all of which relate to provisions similar to those in Chapter 6456, Acts of 1913, and other acts affecting the Everglades Drainage District. The questions raised and considered by the Court below in this case were similar to t