Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2478 ___________________________ Cecilia Perry, Plaintiff Ad Litem for Christina Brooks, Next of Friend for D.B, D.B, D.B and D.B lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v.

198 Mich. App. 1 (1993) 497 N.W.2d 514 ADAMS v. PERRY FURNITURE COMPANY Docket No. 129210. Michigan Court of Appeals. Submitted June 24, 1992, at Lansing. Decided January 19, 1993, at 9:10 A.M. Michael T. Materna and (Donald M. Fulkerson, of Counsel), for Yvonne Adams. *3

Decisions of The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Without Published Opinions Dismissed for lack of prosecution.

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia ex rel. Robert L. Adams, Petitioner FILED November 12, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK vs) No. 13-0096 (Logan County 12-C-313)

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of July 2017 by Plaintiff for Application for Preliminary and/or Permanent Injunction:"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of July 2017 by Plaintiff to Strike and Dismiss Defendant Insufficient Defense Claim:*400"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of August 2017."

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

213 Ga. 479 (1957) 99 S.E.2d 881 ADAMS v. PERRY et al.; and vice versa. 19778, 19779. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted July 22, 1957. Decided September 6, 1957. Larsen & Larsen, for plaintiff in error. Carl K. Nelson, Nelson & Nelson, contra. *480 DUC

827 P.2d 930 (1992) 112 Or.App. 77 William John PERRY, Appellant — Cross-Respondent, v. Stanley N. ADAMS, Respondent — Cross-Appellant. A8608-04757; CA A64658. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted October 28, 1991. Decided March 11, 1992. Michael J. Morris, Portland, argued the cause for appellant — cross-responde

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TAMARA O. MITCHELL, Bankruptcy Judge. This adversary proceeding came before the Court on July 23, 2014, for trial on the complaint to determine dischargeability of a debt filed by Dr. Maria Wellman Perry. Appearing before the Court were Debt- or/Plaintiff Dr. Maria Wellman Perry; Oscar W. Adams, III, counsel for Dr. Perry; Sheryl Walker, Senior Auditor for Defendant

PER CURIAM: * Philip Robert Critchley, Jr., Michael Powers, Cary A. Wilke, Steven M. *360Schuelke, Richard C. Stricklin, and Michael R. Adams (the Appellants) filed a civil rights lawsuit challenging § 501.063 of the Texas Government Code, which requires state inmates to pay an annual $100 health care services fee from their prison trust a

OPINION NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge. The right to vote: It defines our nation as a democracy. It is the key to what Abraham Lincoln so famously extolled as a “government of the people, by the people, [and] for the people.”1 The Supreme Court of the United States, placing the power of the right to vote in context, explained: “Especially since the right to ex

In re Savov, Mark; — Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated January 27, 2014, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 20110700; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 13-416. Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, § 6.

ORDER ORLANDO L. GARCIA, District Judge, JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge. On this date, the Court considered Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (docket no. *614995). Defendants raise two arguments in their motion: (1) the claims relating to the 2011 plans are moot and the Court should reconsider its prior rulings to the c

In re Savoy, Mark; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 20110700; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 13-416. Denied.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Adam L. Perry appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on his claim that they misappropriated his identity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

JUDGMENT This appeal was considered on the record of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. The court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district

OPINION DIXON, JUDGE: Homestead Family Farm seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed the ALJ’s dismissal of David Perry’s claim for benefits. The sole issue presented concerns whether the agriculture exemption applies to Perry’s claim. Pursuant to KRS 342.630(1), an employer “engaged solely in agriculture” does not have to comply with the provisions of th

Petition for rehearing denied.