⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Adam Vincent Haygood”

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993-04-12 · Published · cited 8× · 991 F.2d 746; 93 Daily Journal DAR 5787; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7530
991 F.2d 746 127 Lab.Cas. P 33,061, 1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 637 George C. ARMITAGE, Alan P. King, Ronnie A. Lewis, Kerry B.Swiggum, Michael D. Sword, Eric Aikin, Brian C. Cornett,Charles August Franco, William J. Greaves, John E.Griffiths, Jr., Scott W. Haygood, William J. Hull, RichardC. Kohr, Jesse R. Lewis, Jr., Lisa K. Lyons, Terry F. Lyons,Mark D. Marr, D.J. Moore, Dale Wayne Polley,
Coleman v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 820 So. 2d 166; 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 204; 2001 WL 1149542
I agree with the majority's unpublished memorandum as to all issues except Issue IV. As to Issue IV, I dissent, based on Judge Shaw's special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, Aug. 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). As to those points of law on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, supra. *Page 167 DECISIONS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPIN
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009-05-22 · Published · cited 405× · 16 So. 3d 1065; 2009 La. LEXIS 1648; 2009 WL 1426272
KNOLL, Justice.* LWe granted these consolidated writ applications to resolve a conflict among the appellate courts of this state on the issue of whether mesothelioma is a compensable occupational disease under the pre-1975 version of the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Act (the “Act”). Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc., et al., 08-1163 c/w 08-1169 (La.9/26/08), 992 So.2d 972, 973. Specif
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 28 Fed. Cl. 746; 991 F.2d 746; 1993 WL 106743
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States Claims Court granting, inter alia, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their claim for Sunday premium pay for employees who were regularly scheduled to work on Sunday but who availed themselves of authorized annual or sick leave during the scheduled Sun*748day
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 415 S.W.3d 327; 2013 WL 4076868
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of