Cases

OPINION Kelly, Judge: This action comes before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the *1288 agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2. See Mot. Pl. Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee J. Agency R. Under USCIT Rule 56.2, Apr. 20, 2016, ECF No. 27 (“Pl. 56.2

OPINION Kelly, Judge: Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) remand determination filed pursuant to the court’s order in Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United States, 41 CIT -, 219 F.Supp.3d 1286 (2017) (“Ad Hoc Shrimp I”). See Final Results of Redeter-mination Pursuant to Court

OPINION Pogue, Senior Judge: This action arises from the seventh administrative review by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the antidumping duty order (“the order”) on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”). 1 In this

OPINION and ORDER POGUE, Senior Judge: This action arises from the seventh administrative review by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the antidumping duty (“AD”) order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”). 1 In this

OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: This action arises from the sixth administrative review by the United States De *1305 partment of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or

WALLACH, Circuit Judge. Appellants Hilltop International and Ocean Duke Corp. (collectively, “Hilltop”) appeal the decisions of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) affirming the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination that Hilltop is ineligible for an antidump-ing duty rate separate from the countrywide entity and its selection of t

OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: This action arises from the sixth administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering certain frozen warmwater shrimp (the “subject merchandise”) from *1364 the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (“Vietnam”).

OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: This action arises from the fifth administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the People’s Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”). 1 In prior proceedings, the court remanded certain aspects of the

OPINION AND ORDER POGUE, Chief Judge: Before the court is Defendant’s motion to expand the scope of previously ordered remand proceedings. Def.’s Partial Con *1379 sent Mot. to Expand the Scope of the Court’s Nov. 30, 2012 Remand Order, ECF No. 68 (“Def.’s M

OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: This consolidated action seeks review of two determinations by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in the 2010-2011 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Thailand. 2 Specifically,

OPINION AND ORDER POGUE, Chief Judge: This action seeks review of four determinations by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in the fifth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the People’s Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”).

OPINION POGUE, Chief Judge: This case returns to the court following remand by Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Comm. v. United States, — CIT —, 791 F.Supp.2d 1327 (2011) (“Ad Hoc I”). In Ad Hoc I, the court reviewed the final results of the fourth administrative review of the antidumping

PER CURIAM. JUDGMENT This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

791 F.Supp.2d 1327 (2011) AD HOC SHRIMP TRADE ACTION COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Hilltop International and Ocean Duke Corp., Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 11-106. Court No. 10-00275. United States Court of International Trade. August 24, 2011. *1329 Picard Kentz & Rowe LLP, Washington, DC, (An

618 F.3d 1316 (2010) AD HOC SHRIMP TRADE ACTION COMMITTEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., Defendant-Appellee. No. 2010-1027. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. September 8, 2010. *1319 Kevin M. O'Connor, Picard, Kentz & Rowe

703 F.Supp.2d 1330 (2010) AD HOC SHRIMP TRADE ACTION COMMITTEE, Versaggi Shrimp Corporation, and Indian Ridge Shrimp Company, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Eastern Fish Company, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 10-39. Court No. 05-00192. United States Court of International Trade. April 14, 2010. *1331 Pica

712 F.Supp.2d 1369 (2010) AD HOC SHRIMP TRADE ACTION COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Pakfood Public Company Limited et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 10-45. Court No. 08-00283. United States Court of International Trade. April 29, 2010. Before: WALLACH, Judge. ORDER AND JUDGMENT WALLACH, Judge. T

OPINION GOLDBERG, Senior Judge: Plaintiff Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee (“Ad Hoc Shrimp”) is a domestic association of producers and processors of warmwater shrimp. In this action, Ad Hoc Shrimp contests certain aspects of the administrative determination issued by the International Trade Administration of the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) in the second administrative review of the

637 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2009) AD HOC SHRIMP TRADE ACTION COMMITTEE, Versaggi Shrimp Corporation, and Indian Ridge Shrimp Company, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Eastern Fish Company, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 09-69. Court No. 05-00192. United States Court of International Trade. July 1, 2009. *1168 Dewey

675 F.Supp.2d 1287 (2009) AD HOC SHRIMP TRADE ACTION COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant and Pakfood Public Company Limited et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 09-151. Court No. 08-00283. United States Court of International Trade. December 29, 2009. *1291 Pickard, Kentz and Rowe, LLP (Andrew W. Kentz and Na