Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Abtrax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Elkins-Sinn, Inc.”
Abtrax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Elkins-Sinn, Inc.public domain
139 N.J. 499 (1995) 655 A.2d 1368 ABTRAX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., T/A SUMMIT HILL LABORATORIES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. ELKINS-SINN, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued January 3, 1995. Decided April 10, 1995. *502 Timothy J. Hinlick
Robertet Flavors, Inc. v. Tri-Form Construction Inc.public domain
1 A.3d 658 (2010) 203 N.J. 252 ROBERTET FLAVORS, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TRI-FORM CONSTRUCTION, INC., Robert Karabinchak, and Academy Glass, Defendants-Appellants, and Tami-Githens, Inc., A-Tech Concrete Company, Inc., and Fisher Contracting, Inc., Defendants. and Tri-Form Construction, Inc., and Robert Karabinchak, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. A-Tech Concrete Company, Inc., Fisher Contracting, Inc., N
Tartaglia v. Paine Webber, Inc.public domain
FUENTES, J.S.C. This matter comes before the court by way of a return date of an Order to Show Cause Temporary Restraints issued by Judge Maurice Gallipoli on January 31, 2000.1 The gravamen of defendant’s application centers on plaintiffs pre-litigation conduct in procuring certain alleged confidential and/or proprietary documents. The moving party, defendant Paine Webber, seeks by way of sancti
In Re AH Robins Co., Inc.public domain
118 B.R. 436 (1990) In re A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 85-01307-R. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. August 6, 1990. *437 William J. Sweeney, Giblin & Combs, Morristown, N.J., for Abtrax Pharmaceutical Corp., Inc. James C. Crockett, Jr., Mays & Valentine, Richmon
Kosmowski v. Atlantic City Medical Centerpublic domain
The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J. The sole issue raised in this medical malpractice — wrongful death case is whether the complaint should have been dismissed because of the unavailability of plaintiffs’ medical expert. We *571conclude that under the unique facts of this ease, the trial court should reassess its discretionary rul
Remy v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
DONOHUE, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 30, 2006) This matter is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion to Dismiss for Spoliation of Evidence or, in the alternative for Lack of Prosecution. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED on both grounds. *144
International Fidelity Insurance v. Goldbergpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, J.A.D. Plaintiff commenced an action against non-resident defendants, who pled lack of personal jurisdiction as an affirmative defense and moved to dismiss on that ground. On January 20, 1994, the trial court entered an order adjourning the motion to dismiss pending completion of jurisdictional discovery, establishing that plaintiff would be responsible fo
Lobiondo v. O'CALLAGHANpublic domain
815 A.2d 1013 (2003) 357 N.J. Super. 488 James LOBIONDO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Liam O'CALLAGHAN, Defendant-Appellant, and John Mulheren, Defendant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 4, 2002. Decided February 19, 2003. *1014 Paul H. Schneider, Middletown, argued the ca
Hewitt v. Allen Canning Co.public domain
728 A.2d 319 (1999) 321 N.J. Super. 178 Roland HEWITT, III, Plaintiff, v. ALLEN CANNING COMPANY, Wakefern Food Corporation, Shop-rite, John Doe Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Jane DOE (1-10)(fictitious name of other responsible individuals), JANE DOE (1-10) (fictitious name of other responsible individuals), ABC COMPANY and/or Corporation (fictitious name of other responsible entities), Defendants, v.
Turner-Adeniji v. Accountants on Callpublic domain
892 F.Supp. 645 (1995) Dianne R. TURNER-ADENIJI, Plaintiff, v. ACCOUNTANTS ON CALL, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 94-3638 (JCL). United States District Court, D.New Jersey. July 26, 1995. *646 Dianne R. Turner-Adeniji, Newark, NJ, pro se. Ronald A. Breslow, Wayne, NJ, for defendant. MEMORANDUM and ORDER LI
Mitchell v. Procinipublic domain
752 A.2d 349 (2000) 331 N.J. Super. 445 Anthony D. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLES P. PROCINI, D.D.S., P.A. and Charles P. Procini, Defendants-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued April 12, 2000. Decided June 12, 2000. *350 Mark J. Molz, Hainesport, for plaintiff-
Kolczycki v. City of East Orangepublic domain
722 A.2d 603 (1999) 317 N.J. Super. 505 Larry KOLCZYCKI, Thomas Matarese and Bachelor I Tavern, Inc., t/a Scandals, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, the Office of the Mayor for the City of East Orange, the East Orange City Council, the East Orange Police DepartmentBureau of Internal Affairs, the East Orange Fire Department, the East Orange Bureau of Fire Prevention, the East Orange Department of Property Ma
Cornblatt v. Barowpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by KIMMELMAN, J.A.D. At issue on this appeal is the interpretation of and effect to be given to recently enacted legislation requiring the filing of an affidavit of merit in order to maintain a cause of action against certain licensed professional persons for malpractice or negligence. See N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-26 to -29 (the “statute”). The statute was signed into l
Cavallaro v. Jamco Property Mgt.public domain
760 A.2d 353 (2000) 334 N.J. Super. 557 Tony CAVALLARO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMCO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, Defendant-Appellant, and JML Landscaping, Inc., and Village Commons, Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued October 4, 2000. Decided October 23, 2000. *354 Cynthia A
Medford v. Dugganpublic domain
732 A.2d 533 (1999) 323 N.J. Super. 127 Nancy MEDFORD and David Medford, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Doreen DUGGAN and Michael P. Duggan, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Rossi Ranch, Lynn Foster, John Doe 1-10 and ABC Companies, 1-10, Third-Party Defendants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued February 23, 1999.
Glass v. Suburban Restoration Co.public domain
722 A.2d 944 (1998) 317 N.J. Super. 574 Helen GLASS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SUBURBAN RESTORATION CO., INC., and John Markovic, Individually, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellants. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued November 16, 1998. Decided December 30, 1998. *945 David A. S
Karen Passero v. Louis Jacobellipublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2322-24 KAREN PASSERO and LOUIS PASSERO, h/w, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiffs-Respondents, AS REDACTED June
Fox v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.public domain
281 N.J. Super. 476 (1995) 658 A.2d 732 HARRY M. FOX, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MERCEDES-BENZ CREDIT CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued April 5, 1995. Decided May 22, 1995. *477 Before Judges KING, MUIR, Jr., and BILDER. John F. Darcy arg
Rolnick v. Rolnickpublic domain
290 N.J. Super. 35 (1996) 674 A.2d 1006 E. CHRISTINE ROLNICK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JEROME J. ROLNICK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted March 26, 1996. Decided April 25, 1996. *38 Before Judges MICHELS, VILLANUEVA and KIMMELMAN. Lampf, Lipkind, P
Mesgleski v. Orabonipublic domain
748 A.2d 1130 (2000) 330 N.J. Super. 10 Kenneth MESGLESKI and Linda Mesgleski, Defendants-Appellants, v. Peter J. ORABONI and the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Ocean County Branch, Plaintiffs-Respondents. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted March 6, 2000. Decided April 3, 2000.