Cases

Barnes, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Kristie Abner appeals the sentence the trial court imposed after she admitted to violating the terms of her placement on home detention. We affirm. Issue [2] Abner raises one issue, which we restate as: whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering her to serve h

496 F.Supp.2d 810 (2007) James ABNER, III, Adan Alamaguer Alaniz, Jason Baase, Richard Bauman, Anita Benavidez, Jerry Boose, Robert Brewer, Jr., La'Shaundria Carson, Francisco Castillo, Steven Clark, Jacob Coronado, Carl Delaney, Kris Doud, Sr., David Eudis, Jonathan Flora, Mary Franz, Judith Glesmer, James Hahn, L.C. Harris, Jr., Corneathia Harvey, Donald Hasse, Joshua Jekel, Brad Johnson, Mander Johnson, Jr., Viella Johnson, Dennis Jolin, Brad Kuznicki

Willie James Abner appeals from the circuit court's summary denial of his *Page 829 Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for postconviction relief. The petition challenged Abner's April 11, 2006, guilty-plea conviction for trafficking in cocaine and his resulting sentence of life imprisonment.1 Abner's direct appeal was dismissed because Abner failed to certify to this Court the specific issues that h

139 Ga. App. 600 (1976) 229 S.E.2d 83 ABNER v. THE STATE. ARMSTRONG v. THE STATE. HILL v. THE STATE. JOHNSON v. THE STATE. SCOTT v. THE STATE. 52421, 52422, 52423, 52424, 52425. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted July 15, 1976. Decided September 8, 1976. Rehearing Denie

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jun 19 2019, 9:14 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeal

Johnny Lee Abner was arrested and charged with one count of unlawful possession of a controlled substance (cocaine), a violation of § 13A-12-212, Ala. Code 1975, and one count of unlawful possession of marijuana in the second degree, a violation of § 13A-12-214, Ala. Code 1975.1 The circuit court granted Abner's oral motion to suppress certain evidence, namely, the

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from the district court’s disposition of Reginald Brinkmann’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Dallas County, four of its deputy sheriffs, and Sue O’Hara, a counselor in the Family Court Services Department. The district court granted O’Hara’s motion for summary judgment, and subsequently dis

The appellant, Willie James Abner, pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, unlawful possession of cocaine, a violation of §13A-12-212, Ala. Code 1975. He was sentenced as a habitual felony offender to 15 years' imprisonment. Before pleading guilty, the appellant had moved to suppress the state's evidence, arguing that the cocaine was seized pursuant to an unlawful search. After a hearing, the trial court denied the motion, and the appellant reserved

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 3, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE

RULING AND ORDER JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (R. Doc. 134) filed by Tyrone Kilbourne and Percy Babin. Plaintiff Marcus D. Hill opposes the motion. (R. Doc. 136). No oral argument is necessary. Considering the law, facts in the record, and the argument

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION December 3, 2020 Plaintiff-Appellant,

283 B.R. 176 (2002) In re MID-ATLANTIC RESOURCES CORP., Debtor. William E. Abner, et al., Appellants, v. Mate Creek Loading, Inc., et al., Appellees. No. Civ.A. 5:01-0699. Bankruptcy No. 99-50521. Adversary No. 00-0068. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia. August 28, 2002. *177 *178<

LAY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s finding of discrimination in job assignments. Likewise, I concur that plaintiffs lack standing to challenge Western Electric’s hiring practices and the alleged sex discrimination in promotions in the Installation facility. I must voice vigo

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 459.] THE STATE EX REL. WOODS, APPELLANT, v. OAK HILL COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER, INC., APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Woods v. Oak Hill Community Med. Ctr., 2001-Ohio-96.] Torts—Medical malpractice action—Judgment entered in favor of defendants— Request for oral argument before Supreme Court denied, when— Mandamus sought to compel hospital to, inter alia, identify all

Per Curiam. In the early morning of April 5, 1995, appellant, Donald Woods, went to the emergency room of appellee, Oak Hill Community Medical Center (“Oak Hill”), a hospital located in Oak Hill, Ohio, complaining of chest pain. Several tests were performed on Woods, including a CK-MB% blood enzyme test. The CK-MB% blood enzyme test is used to determine if a patient is experiencing a heart attack.

236 Ga. 703 (1976) 224 S.E.2d 907 HILL v. THE STATE. 30895. Supreme Court of Georgia. Submitted March 5, 1976. Decided April 6, 1976. Eric Welch, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carole E. Wall, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, John W. Dunsmore, Jr., Assistant

Reversing. Walker Abner died at his home in Bowlingtown, Perry county, on May 4, 1928. He was a World War veteran, and was married twice after his return from service in the army. By his first wife he had one child, Iona Abner. By his second wife, Susie Hacker, formerly Susie Begley, he had two children, Lily Abner and Lucy Abner. Walker Abner was the owner of a small store, located near his home, some livestock and other items of personal property, together with several small tracts o

Chester, J.: The action is for a trespass on land. The complaint is in the usual form. It alleges, first, that the plaintiff since the 13th day of February, 1898, has been and still is the owner and in possession of *326certain premises described therein, and second, that the defendant between the 13th day of February, 1898, and the 1st day of August, 1901, a

INGRAHAM, J. This action was in form one for the foreclosure of a mortgage upon real property. The complaint alleges the execution of a mortgage upon the property described in the complaint, as security for the payment of an indebtedness of $18,000, evidenced by a certain bond of the mortgagor, said bond containing a clause that, upon default of payment of interest within 30 days after ,the same became due, the principal sum an

Ingraham, J. : This action was, in form, for the forelosnre of a mortgage upon real property. ■ The complaint alleges the execution of a mortgage *521upon tlie property described in the complaint, as security for the payment of an indebtedness of $18,000, evidenced by a certain bond of the mortgagor, said bond containing a clause that, upon default of payment of inter