Cases

ORDER The judgment of this court, 146 F.3d 653 (9th Cir.1998), having been reversed by the United States Supreme Court, United States v. Martinez-Salazar, 528 U.S. 304, 120 S.Ct. 774, 145 L.Ed.2d 792 (2000), this case is remanded to the district court.

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Jose Abel Martinez appeals the district court’s denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief. He also seeks to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Petitioner, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in El Reno, Oklahoma, alleges that the Bureau of Prisons (hereafter “BOP”) wrongfully refused to grant him a one y

CLAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Defendant Abel Martinez Tavera and his co-defendant Placido Ventura Mendoza were together during the commission of the crime for which Defendant was convicted. Other than Defendant himself, Mendoza was the only witness who could have corroborated Defendant’s version of *715events, and Defendant admits that he knew as much

Opinion by Judge MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RYMER. MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge. FACTS Abel Martinez-Salazar (“Martinez-Salazar”) was tried and convicted, along with a codefendant, of: (1) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; (2) possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of

LEVINE, J. The issues presented for our review are whether the trial court erred in allowing the state, during a criminal prosecution, to question witnesses and argue in closing argument that appellant had hired a law firm to file a civil suit related to the incident for which appellant was arrested. We find, specifically, that the trial court erred in allowing the state to question a doctor, testifying for appellant, as t

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge: Abel Martinez-Duran appeals his twenty month sentence for use of a communication facility in committing a drug offense, claiming the district court’s upward departure was unreasonable. Roger Carrie-Sandoval 1 appeals his twenty-four month sentence for renting or managing a building for the purp

SUMMARY ORDER Earl Abel Martinez, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, seeks review of a November 5, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the August 1, 2007 order of Immigration Judge (“U”) Roger F. Sager-man, finding that he had abandoned his opportunity to file for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Earl Abel Martinez, No. A44 132 988 (B.I.A. Nov. 5, 2007), ajfg No. A44 132

SUMMARY ORDER Earl Abel Martinez, a native and citizen of the Dominican Republic, seeks review of a November 5, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the August 1, 2007 order of Immigration Judge (“U”) Roger F. Sager-man, finding that he had abandoned his opportunity to file for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Earl Abel Martinez, No. A44 132 988 (B.I.A. Nov. 5, 2007), ajfg No. A44 132

Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 31, 2023 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00435-CV JAUSHSTEILYEE MARTINEZ, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ABEL CASTRO, DECEASED, Appellant V. K & B PROPERTIES, L.P., KEN ARMSTRONG AND BRIAN BATTLE, Appellee On Appeal from

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Abel Hernandez Rodriguez pleaded guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to conspiring to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing methamphetamine and 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. Hernandez later moved to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming that his c

36 F.3d 1105 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Ab

MEMORANDUM ** Abel Martinez-Valencia appeals his sentence following a guilty plea to one count of violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5) and 924(a), possession of a firearm by an alien. Having requested and reviewed briefing by the parties as to whether the appeal is moot, we conclude that it is not. United States v. Allen, 434 F.3d 1166,1170 (9th Cir.2006). As Martinez-Valencia remains subject to a ter

OPINION AL SCOGGINS, Justice In this appeal, appellant, Abraham Chavez Martinez, complains that: (1) the trial *916 court abused its discretion in ordering the sentence in this case to run consecutive to a prior sentence in which appellant was on parole; and (2) the assessme

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioners’ applications for cancellation of removal. We have reviewed the opposition to the motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction and the response to the court’s December 16, 2008 order to show cause, and

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an Immigration Judge’s order denying petitioners’ applications for cancellation of removal. We have reviewed the opposition to the motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction and the response to the court’s December 16, 2008 order to show cause, and

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Abel Chavez-Martinez concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Pursu

OPINION In this consolidated appeal, Efrain Nunez Martinez appeals his conviction for tampering with a governmental record,1 and the subsequent revocation of his probation. The court sentenced appellant to imprisonment for five and seven years, respectively. We affirm the conviction, *Page 676 but reverse and remand for a new punishment hearing, and affirm the rev

PD-1405-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS NO. PD-1405-15 Transmitted 11/30/2015 11:13:31 PM Accepted 12/1/2015 3:47:46 PM

PD-1405-15 PD-1405-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 10/28/2015 5:20:10 PM November 2, 2015 Accepted 11/2/201

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 96-1-00860-1, Donald D. Haley, J., entered November 25, 1996. Affirmed in part and reversed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.