Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Abdullah v. Bureau of Prisons”
People v. Abdullahpublic domain
People v Abdullah (2022 NY Slip Op 06146) People v Abdullah 2022 NY Slip Op 06146 Decided on November 2, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
People v. Abdullahpublic domain
People v Abdullah (2022 NY Slip Op 04045) People v Abdullah 2022 NY Slip Op 04045 Decided on June 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
People v. Abdullahpublic domain
People v Abdullah (2021 NY Slip Op 05742) People v Abdullah 2021 NY Slip Op 05742 Decided on October 21, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
Matter of Abdullah v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision (2023 NY Slip Op 06298) Matter of Abdullah v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision 2023 NY Slip Op 06298 Decided on December 7, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department <
State v. Azad Haji Abdullahpublic domain
WALTERS, Justice pro tem. On November 19, 2004, a jury found Azad Haji Abdullah guilty of first-degree murder, first-degree arson, three counts of attempted first-degree murder, and felony injury to a child. The ease proceeded to sentencing and the jury found the existence of two aggravating circumstances. The jury also found that all the mitigating circumstances when weighed ag
Case: 12-16243 Date Filed: 09/23/2013 Page: 1 of 44 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-16243 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:06-cv-20570-AJ ASKARI ABD
PRYOR, Circuit Judge: To learn about the gridlock and inefficiency of death penalty litigation, look no further than this appeal. Askari Abdullah Muhammad kidnapped and murdered Sydney and Lillian Gans four decades ago, in 1974. A Florida jury convicted Muhammad of murder, a Florida judge sentenced him to death, and the Supreme Court of Florida affirmed his conviction and sentence on direct appeal. While he awaited state c
Abdullah v. Roachpublic domain
668 A.2d 801 (1995) Muhammad ABDULLAH, Appellant, v. David ROACH, et al., Appellees. No. 94-SP-293. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued October 19, 1995. Decided December 4, 1995. *802 Hastings Jones, with whom Robert C. Hauhart, Staff Attorneys, Public Defender Service, Washington, DC, was on the brief
United States v. Hamood Abdullahpublic domain
OPINION DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge. The defendant, Hamood Abdullah, appeals his conviction for the illegal receipt and possession of contraband cigarettes and his sentence of 21 months, followed by two years of supervised release. In addition, Abdullah was held jointly and severally liable with other individuals involved in a contraband cigarette distribut
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL COUNSEL BUREAU and PILLSBURY, WINTHROP, SHAW, PITTMAN, LLP, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 08-1063 (JDB) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION International Counsel Bureau and Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP (col
723 F.Supp.2d 54 (2010) INTERNATIONAL COUNSEL BUREAU and Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-1063 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 12, 2010. *55 Ronald A. Schechter, Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC, for P
People v. Abdullahpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1730 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1731 OPINION Hanif Saladin Abdullah (Abdullah) appeals, following his plea of guilty to receiving stolen property
Abdullah v. Gattopublic domain
PER CURIAM: Before us are motions for the assignment of counsel and leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant is presently incarcerated at the Arthur Kill Correctional Facility as a result of having been found guilty by a New York state jury of two counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument and two counts of criminal possession of stolen property. Following his incarceration, appell
774 F.Supp.2d 262 (2011) INTERNATIONAL COUNSEL BUREAU, Plaintiff, v. U.S. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-2269 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2011. *264 Ronald A. Schechter, Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Jonathan Eli Zimmer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL COUNSEL BUREAU, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 09-2269 (JDB) U.S. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Plaintiffs International Counsel Bureau and Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP (collectively, "ICB") brin
OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. Mika’eel Abdullah Abdus-Samad (formerly known as Michael J. Boyd), a Tennessee inmate sentenced to death following his 1986 jury conviction for first-degree felony murder, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Warden Ricky Bell on Abdus-Samad’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. A certificate of appeala
RONEY, Chief Judge: This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus in a capital case, the tragic facts of which have been referred to as “unusual and bizarre.” Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997, 999 (Fla.1981). On July 17, 1974, Askari Abdullah Muhammad, formerly known as Thomas Knight, abducted Sydney Gans, a wealthy Miami business man on his way to work, forced him to return to his home and held his wif
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YASMANI GURRI RUBIO, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-719 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Yasmani Gurri Rubio, proceeding pro se, commenced this action against the District of Columbia Departm
Matter of Golston v Director of Div. of Nutritional Servs. (2019 NY Slip Op 00512) Matter of Golston v Director of Div. of Nutritional Servs. 2019 NY Slip Op 00512 Decided on January 24, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department
Matter of Jones v. Uhlerpublic domain
Matter of Jones v Uhler (2025 NY Slip Op 02252) Matter of Jones v Uhler 2025 NY Slip Op 02252 Decided on April 17, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</