Cases

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ___________________________________ ) DANNY L. ABBOTT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 15-211 L ) v. ) Filed: September 28, 2022 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) )

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0184p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PAUL W. ABBOTT, et al. (22-5492); MICHAEL B. REED, │ individu

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2023 MSPB 14 Docket Nos. DC-0752-12-0366-X-1 DC-0752-12-0366-X-2 Mary A. Abbott, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service,

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William R. Abbott, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we affirm for the reaso

PER CURIAM: William R. Abbott, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abbott v. United States, No. 2:ll-cv-00567-RGD-TEM (E.D.Va. Nov. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts an

*12 Justice Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court. As one of several measures to punish gun possession by-persons engaged in crime, Congress made it a discrete offense to use, carry, or possess a deadly weapon in connection with “any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.” 1

Motion of petitioner for divided argument granted. Justice Ka-gan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 47 Docket No. DC-0752-12-0366-I-1 Mary A. Abbott, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2014 MSPB 47 Docket No. DC-0752-12-0366-I-1 Mary A. Abbott, Appellant, v. United States Postal Service, Agency.

TERRY, Associate Judge: Gregory Abbott appeals from the denial of his post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas in six related cases. On appeal he contends that the prosecutor’s remarks at the sentencing hearing did not meet a standard of strict compliance with the plea agreement. He argues that “[wjhile not explicitly asking for incarceration greater than four years, the government implicitly suggested that it favor

543 U.S. 1105 ABBOTTv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-5721. Supreme Court of United States. January 24, 2005. 1 C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 98 Fed. Appx. 567; Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases r

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM: The judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ action seeking refunds of federal income and social security employment taxes withheld from lump-sum payments, made to them by their employer upon the termination of their employment, calculated on the basis of each plaintiffs salary and years of service, and conditioned on the signing of releases, is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district co

OPINION AND ORDER HEWITT, Judge. Plaintiffs1 filed their Complaint in this matter on July 1, 1994, seeking monetary damages in the form of back pay and interest for alleged violations of federal law that would entitle plaintiffs to hazardous duty pay for law enforcement activities they perform as employees of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Uni

76 F.Supp.2d 236 (1999) Marie N. ABBOTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 3:96-CV-510. United States District Court, N.D. New York. December 3, 1999. *237 O'Connor, Gacioch & Pope, Binghamton, NY, Thomas F. O'Connor, of counsel, Ball Janik LLP, Portland, OR, for plaintiffs, James T. McDermott, N

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23 - 1555 (LLA) JAMES T. ABBOTT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff United States of America seeks a civil penalty of $40,000 from Defendant James T. Abbott for his failure