⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Aaron M Brown”

Krys v. Aaronpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015-05-29 · Published · cited 1× · 312 F.R.D. 373; 2015 WL 3452324; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69556
*375MEMORANDUM OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: In this lengthy multi-district securities litigation scheduled for trial on June 22, 2015, Plaintiffs Kenneth M. Krys, Margot Macin-nis, and The Harbour Trust Co. Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) move to amend [Docket Item 625] the 308 page Joint Final Pretrial Order entered in this action on November 21,
Krys v. Aaronpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 33× · 112 F. Supp. 3d 181; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76263; 2015 WL 3660332
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: Contents I. INTRODUCTION 187 *187II.BACKGROUND...............................................■..........188 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW ‘...........'...........'........................189 IV. DISCUSSION.........'......................
Krys v. Aaronpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 106 F. Supp. 3d 492; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66882; 2015 WL 2453720
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This lengthy multi-district securities litigation generally arises from the complex financial and brokerage relationships between, and ultimate bankruptcy proceedings of, three entities (and the multitude of affiliates associated with each): PlusFunds Group, Inc. (hereinafter, “PlusFunds”), SPhinX Funds (hereinafter, “SPhinX”), and Refco, I
Krys v. Aaronpublic domain
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015-05-20 · Published · cited 20× · 106 F. Supp. 3d 472; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65747; 2015 WL 2412448
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This lengthy multi-district securities litigation generally arises from the complex financial relationships between, and ultimate bankruptcy proceedings of, three entities (and the multitude of affiliates associated with each): PlusFunds Group, Inc. (hereinafter, “PlusFunds”), SPhinX Funds (hereinafter, “SPhinX”), and Refco, Inc. (hereinafter
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019-07-31 · Published · cited 49× · 932 F.3d 693
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Aaron Dalton sued NPC International, Inc., seeking declaratory and injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq ., and corresponding ADA Accessibility
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016-09-22 · Published · cited 30× · 209 F. Supp. 3d 994; 2016 WL 5242957; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129693
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 61) Timothy S. Black, United States District Judge This civil action is before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Omnibus Complaint filed August 28, 2015 (Doc. 61). The Omnibus Complaint (Doc. 54) consolidates the claims from five cases brought against Defendants. See 4/20/15 Minute Entry and Notation Order. Plaintiffs filed a re
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 176 So. 3d 1108; 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 1312; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 744; 2015 WL 1651075
. KEATY, Judge. hFor the reasons set forth in the companion and consolidated case hereto, Ned v. Union Pacific Corp., 14-1310 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/15/15), 176 So.3d 1095, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED.
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015-06-10 · Published · cited 4× · 235 W. Va. 640; 776 S.E.2d 142; 2015 W. Va. LEXIS 730
LOUGHRY, Justice:, . Aaron Browning, the plaintiff below and the petitioner herein, appeals from the September 16,2013, order of the Circuit Court of Logan County denying his motion' for a new trial following an adverse jury verdict in his civil action for damages arising from an automobile accident. He asserts that the circuit court made various evidentiary errors at trial. David Hickman, the defendant below and the responden
State v. Aaronpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 57 So. 3d 365; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 8; 2011 WL 93833
CARAWAY, J. |2Ponald Aaron was charged by grand jury indictment with manslaughter in violation of La. R.S. 14:31. By a 10-2 vote, a jury convicted him of negligent homicide. Prior to trial, the state moved to impose Aaron’s sentence under La.C.Cr.P. art. 893.3, a firearm enhancement statute. Specifically, the state alleged that Aaron actually discharged a firearm during the commission of manslaughter. The trial court imposed
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 3× · 14 F. Supp. 3d 667; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42761; 2014 WL 1327503
MEMORANDUM ORDER CATHY BISSOON, District Judge. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C, 72.D and 72.G of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On January 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 318)
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-05-31 · Published · cited 140× · 824 F.3d 421; 2016 WL 3068018
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judges WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, KING, GREGORY, SHEDD, DUNCAN, AGEE, KEENAN, DIAZ and HARRIS joined. Judge WILKINSON wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge WYNN wrote a dissenting opinion in which Judges FLOYD and THACKER joined. ON REHEARING EN BANC DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: In Uni
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 17× · 111 A.3d 590; 2015 WL 1189610; 2015 Del. Ch. LEXIS 60
OPINION BOUCHARD, C. I. INTRODUCTION This action involves determining whether a Delaware corporation’s non-reciprocal fee-shifting bylaw (the “Bylaw”) applies to a former stockholder’s challenge to the fairness of a 10,000-to-l reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) that the corporation undertook at the behest of its Chi
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014-10-07 · Published · cited 11× · 769 F.3d 535; 89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1277; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19621; 2014 WL 4979692
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. We previously affirmed the judgment of the district court dismissing the third-party counterclaims of the Outland entities. 760 F.3d 674 (7th Cir.2014). After we issued the opinion, the Outland filed a petition for rehearing by the panel. The Gamesa filed a motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38. For the reasons explained below,
Rodriguez v. Brownpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 263 So. 3d 238
PER CURIAM. *239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264
Rodriguez v. Brownpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 263 So. 3d 238
PER CURIAM. *239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015-04-16 · Published · cited 241× · 784 F.3d 154; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6190; 2015 WL 1727613
RENDELL, Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree with the majority that, under our current jurisprudence, the class members here are clearly ascertainable. Indeed, as Judge Smith points out, “Aaron’s own records reveal the computers upon which Detective Mode was activated, as well as the full identity of the customer who leased or purchased each of those computers.” (Maj. Op. at 169) (quoting Byrd v. Aaron’s,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014-07-28 · Published · cited 326× · 760 F.3d 674; 2014 WL 3703945; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14380
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. This lawsuit began as a personal injury case. It expanded to encompass disputes over the entire business relationship between the appellants (collectively “Outland”) and appellees (collectively “Gamesa”). Only Outland’s numerous third-party counterclaims against Gamesa are at issue in this appeal. Gamesa pre
California Court of Appeal · 2014-03-11 · Published · cited 66× · 224 Cal. App. 4th 665; 168 Cal. Rptr. 3d 850; 2014 WL 945565; 2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 223
Opinion AARON, J. I. INTRODUCTION Appellant Shelley Brown was injured in a bicycle accident involving her riding partner, Ronald Voigt. Voigt was riding in front of Brown when the front fork on Voigt’s bicycle failed. Voigt fell and caused Brown, who was unable
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996-05-30 · Published · cited 17× · 80 F.3d 1220
80 F.3d 1220 64 USLW 2692, 131 Lab.Cas. P 11,567,11 IER Cases 910 Sherry AARON; Deborah D. Barber; Dolores V. Beauchamp;Patricia Beauchamp; Brenda Becker; Eva M. Becker; Alice M.Cox; Billi Jo Crews; Betty Doyle; Patty Dull; Jessie F.Dunlap; Lois I. Elseman; Augusta Emmons; Cathy M.Ethington; Carol J. Foster; Joseph E. Foster; Virginia M.Foster; Donald Fritchey; Melissa C. Galbraith;
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2023-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1956 Filed August 30, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. AARON BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, William P. Wegman, District Associate Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction for operating a veh