Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Aaron M Brown”
Krys v. Aaronpublic domain
*375MEMORANDUM OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: In this lengthy multi-district securities litigation scheduled for trial on June 22, 2015, Plaintiffs Kenneth M. Krys, Margot Macin-nis, and The Harbour Trust Co. Ltd. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) move to amend [Docket Item 625] the 308 page Joint Final Pretrial Order entered in this action on November 21,
Krys v. Aaronpublic domain
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: Contents I. INTRODUCTION 187 *187II.BACKGROUND...............................................■..........188 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW ‘...........'...........'........................189 IV. DISCUSSION.........'......................
Krys v. Aaronpublic domain
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This lengthy multi-district securities litigation generally arises from the complex financial and brokerage relationships between, and ultimate bankruptcy proceedings of, three entities (and the multitude of affiliates associated with each): PlusFunds Group, Inc. (hereinafter, “PlusFunds”), SPhinX Funds (hereinafter, “SPhinX”), and Refco, I
Krys v. Aaronpublic domain
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This lengthy multi-district securities litigation generally arises from the complex financial relationships between, and ultimate bankruptcy proceedings of, three entities (and the multitude of affiliates associated with each): PlusFunds Group, Inc. (hereinafter, “PlusFunds”), SPhinX Funds (hereinafter, “SPhinX”), and Refco, Inc. (hereinafter
Aaron Dalton v. NPC International, Inc.public domain
BENTON, Circuit Judge. Aaron Dalton sued NPC International, Inc., seeking declaratory and injunctive relief for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq ., and corresponding ADA Accessibility
Aaron v. Medtronic, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 61) Timothy S. Black, United States District Judge This civil action is before the Court upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Omnibus Complaint filed August 28, 2015 (Doc. 61). The Omnibus Complaint (Doc. 54) consolidates the claims from five cases brought against Defendants. See 4/20/15 Minute Entry and Notation Order. Plaintiffs filed a re
Aaron ex rel. Aaron v. Union Pacific Corp.public domain
. KEATY, Judge. hFor the reasons set forth in the companion and consolidated case hereto, Ned v. Union Pacific Corp., 14-1310 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/15/15), 176 So.3d 1095, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED.
Aaron Browning v. David Hickmanpublic domain
LOUGHRY, Justice:, . Aaron Browning, the plaintiff below and the petitioner herein, appeals from the September 16,2013, order of the Circuit Court of Logan County denying his motion' for a new trial following an adverse jury verdict in his civil action for damages arising from an automobile accident. He asserts that the circuit court made various evidentiary errors at trial. David Hickman, the defendant below and the responden
State v. Aaronpublic domain
CARAWAY, J. |2Ponald Aaron was charged by grand jury indictment with manslaughter in violation of La. R.S. 14:31. By a 10-2 vote, a jury convicted him of negligent homicide. Prior to trial, the state moved to impose Aaron’s sentence under La.C.Cr.P. art. 893.3, a firearm enhancement statute. Specifically, the state alleged that Aaron actually discharged a firearm during the commission of manslaughter. The trial court imposed
Byrd v. Aaron's, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ORDER CATHY BISSOON, District Judge. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C, 72.D and 72.G of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On January 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 318)
United States v. Aaron Grahampublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judges WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, KING, GREGORY, SHEDD, DUNCAN, AGEE, KEENAN, DIAZ and HARRIS joined. Judge WILKINSON wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge WYNN wrote a dissenting opinion in which Judges FLOYD and THACKER joined. ON REHEARING EN BANC DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: In Uni
Robert Strougo v. Aaron P. Hollanderpublic domain
OPINION BOUCHARD, C. I. INTRODUCTION This action involves determining whether a Delaware corporation’s non-reciprocal fee-shifting bylaw (the “Bylaw”) applies to a former stockholder’s challenge to the fairness of a 10,000-to-l reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) that the corporation undertook at the behest of its Chi
Aaron McCoy v. Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.public domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. We previously affirmed the judgment of the district court dismissing the third-party counterclaims of the Outland entities. 760 F.3d 674 (7th Cir.2014). After we issued the opinion, the Outland filed a petition for rehearing by the panel. The Gamesa filed a motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38. For the reasons explained below,
Rodriguez v. Brownpublic domain
PER CURIAM. *239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264
Rodriguez v. Brownpublic domain
PER CURIAM. *239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264
Crystal Byrd v. Aaron's Incpublic domain
RENDELL, Circuit Judge, concurring: I agree with the majority that, under our current jurisprudence, the class members here are clearly ascertainable. Indeed, as Judge Smith points out, “Aaron’s own records reveal the computers upon which Detective Mode was activated, as well as the full identity of the customer who leased or purchased each of those computers.” (Maj. Op. at 169) (quoting Byrd v. Aaron’s,
Aaron McCoy v. Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.public domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. This lawsuit began as a personal injury case. It expanded to encompass disputes over the entire business relationship between the appellants (collectively “Outland”) and appellees (collectively “Gamesa”). Only Outland’s numerous third-party counterclaims against Gamesa are at issue in this appeal. Gamesa pre
Brown v. American Bicycle Group, LLCpublic domain
Opinion AARON, J. I. INTRODUCTION Appellant Shelley Brown was injured in a bicycle accident involving her riding partner, Ronald Voigt. Voigt was riding in front of Brown when the front fork on Voigt’s bicycle failed. Voigt fell and caused Brown, who was unable
Aaron v. Brown Group, Inc.public domain
80 F.3d 1220 64 USLW 2692, 131 Lab.Cas. P 11,567,11 IER Cases 910 Sherry AARON; Deborah D. Barber; Dolores V. Beauchamp;Patricia Beauchamp; Brenda Becker; Eva M. Becker; Alice M.Cox; Billi Jo Crews; Betty Doyle; Patty Dull; Jessie F.Dunlap; Lois I. Elseman; Augusta Emmons; Cathy M.Ethington; Carol J. Foster; Joseph E. Foster; Virginia M.Foster; Donald Fritchey; Melissa C. Galbraith;
State of Iowa v. Aaron Brownpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1956 Filed August 30, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. AARON BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, William P. Wegman, District Associate Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction for operating a veh