Cases

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Four taxicab drivers sued Uber Technologies, Inc., in Missouri state court, individually and for a putative class. They alleged tortious interference with a valid business expectancy and sought damages. After Uber removed the case, the district court dismissed for failure to state a claim. Vilcek v. Uber USA, LLC , No. 4:15CV1900 HEA,

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit May 24, 2017 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs Daniel Schuehardt (“Schuchardt”) and Michelle Muggli (“Muggli,” and together, “Plaintiffs”) bring this pre-certification class action on behalf of themselves and a putative class of consumers against Defendant Law Office of Rory Clark, A Prof

Aarons, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Schenectady County (Polk, J.), entered October 23, 2015, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 8, for an order of protection. Petitioner and respondent are the married parents of two children (born in 2008 and 2009). The parties separated in 2014 and,

Egan Jr., J.P. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Connerton, J.), entered September 30, 2015, which, among other things, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent (hereinafter the father) are the divorced

*1231 Clark, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Faughnan, J.), entered May 11, 2015 in Madison County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10, to revoke respondent’s regimen of strict and intensive supervision, found respondent to be a

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan December 22, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161085

OPINION NAJAM, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE David Clark and Aaron Clark, doing business as Clark Electric Company (collectively, “Clark”), appeal from the trial court’s order failing to enter a decree of foreclosure on a mechanic’s lien and a *1205judgment of attorney’s fees from Theresa Hunter. Clark raises four issues for

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0153p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT DAVID JONES, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

Petition granted and remanded by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Senior Judge OSTEEN concurred. OPINION WIDENER, Circuit Judge. This case is a petition for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals holding that the petitioner, Aaron Garcia, is eligible for deportation und

David Newbern, Justice. This appeal is from a rape conviction. The appellant, Michael Aaron, was sentenced to life imprisonment. His contentions on appeal are that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction and that the court erred in refusing to suppress testimony about a document found in Aaron’s possession when he was arrested. We affirm because no argument was made in the trial court on the s

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ November 15, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A19D0154. DAVID AARON ROMINE v. THE UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY et al. David Aaron Romine, proceeding pro se, sought to file this civil action in forma pauperis, but the trial court denied the filing under OCGA § 9-15-2 (d). Romine t

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DAVID F. EVANS; COLLIN FINNERTY;  READE SELIGMANN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STEVEN W. CHALMERS; BEVERLY COUNCIL; RONALD HODGE; JEFF LAMB; MICHAEL RIPBERGER; LEE RUSS; PATRICK BAKER, Defendants-Appellants,  No. 11-1436 and CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA; MARK GOTTLIEB; BENJAMIN HIMAN; DAVID ADDISON; MICHAEL NIFONG; LINWOOD WIL

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00478-CR ___________________________ AARON RIOS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COLE JOSEPH SPENCER, No. 21-15521 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-00385- DGC-CDB AARON PEW, #19183, police officer; JACOB ROZEMA, #15724, police officer; KEVIN SHALL, #1554, deputy sheriff; JUSTIN MACKLIN, OPINION #1742, deputy sheriff; MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S

08/30/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 21, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. AARON DEAN WHITMAN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. C28318 David Reed Duggan, Judge _________

(2008) S.J. LOUIS CONSTRUCTION, INC., John Doe and Jane Doe, Plaintiff, v. LEWIS & CLARK REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM, Defendant. No. CIV. 08-4077. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division. August 8, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF STANDING LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. Plaintif

192 Ga. App. 698 (1989) 385 S.E.2d 780 BENNETT v. CLARK et al. A89A1373. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided September 5, 1989. Harriss, Hartman, Aaron, & Townley, Amy E. Abernathy, for appellant. Gleason & Davis, John W. Davis, Jr., David J. Dunn, Jr., Clifton M. Patty, Jr., Larry D. Ruskaup, for appellees.

99 F.Supp.2d 1064 (2000) Charles CLARK, Sr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, Defendant. No. 00-0097-CV-W-3. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri. May 16, 2000. *1065 Kirk R. Presley, Bartimus, Frickleton, Presley, PC, Kansas City, MO, for Charles Clark, Sr., Vanessa Clark. Patricia A. Mullins,

139 Nev., Advance Opinion 59 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DAVID WILLIAM MCCORD, No. 85271 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent.