Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) WILLIAM “BILL” SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff-Relator, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-2080 (APM) ) ATHENA CONSTR

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. View Point Medical Systems, LLC (“View Point”), plaintiff, brought suit against athenahealth, Inc. (“Athena”), defendant, alleging six claims: fraud in the inducement (Count I); breach of contract (Count II); two claims of intentional breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Counts III and IV); tortious interference with prospec

Per Curiam. A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by appellants Athena Diagnostics, Inc., Oxford University Innovation Ltd., and the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften E.V. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by appellees Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC and Mayo Clinic. Several motions for leave to file amici curiae briefs were fi

Newman, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Until discovery of the diagnostic method described in U.S. Patent No. 7,267,820 ("the '820 patent"), some 20% of patients suffering from the neurological disorderMyasthenia Gravis were not capable of being diagnosed. My colleagues rule that this new diagnostic

Judge Edwin A. Lombard Before the Court in these consolidated cases are the cross-appeals of Plaintiff Athena Antippas and the Defendants, Damon Young and Parking Management Services, who seek review of an August 2, 2017 district court judgment, conforming to a jury verdict rendered on June 28, 2017. After review of the record in light of the applicable law and arguments of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the district court

Judge Edwin A. Lombard Before the Court in these consolidated cases are the cross-appeals of Plaintiff Athena Antippas and the Defendants, Damon Young and Parking Management Services, who seek review of an August 2, 2017 district court judgment, conforming to a jury verdict rendered on June 28, 2017. After review of the record in light of the applicable law and arguments of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the district court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LORREN CHANDLER ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. K22C-12-017 NEP BAYHEALTH MEDICAL ) CENTER, INC. ) ) Defendant. )

Supreme Court No. 2022-42-Appeal. (PC 12-6232) Jordan Nissensohn, Administrator of : the Estate of Michael Nissensohn v. : CharterCARE Home Health Services : a/k/a Roger Williams Medical Center, et al. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publicat

304 F.3d 1221 ELAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and Athena Neurosciences, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-1467. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: August 30, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Lynn H. Pasahow, Fenwick & West LLP, of P

FIFTH DIVISION REESE, P. J., MARKLE and COLVIN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. ALL

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERDEFENDANT OBESITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS (ECF No. 43) Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge On March 16, 2015, Obesity Research Institute, LLC (“Obesity Research”) filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment against Fiber Research International, LLC (“Fiber

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WELLGISTICS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff/counterclaim ) defendant, ) C.A. No.: N22C-08-182 KMM ) v. ) ) WELGO, INC., )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WELLGISTICS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff/counterclaim ) defendant, ) C.A. No.: N22C-08-182 KMM ) v. ) ) WELGO, INC., ) ) D

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted and Opinion filed June 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00191-CV IN RE METHODIST PRIMARY CARE GROUP AND TMH PHYSICIAN ORGANIZATION, Relators ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 234th District Court

Case: 24-1140 Document: 67 Page: 1 Filed: 05/22/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VERSATA SOFTWARE, LLC, FKA TRILOGY SOFTWARE, INC., VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., TRILOGY, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2024-11

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA LEVERTY & ASSOCIATES LAW, No. 80857 CHTD., A NEVADA CORPORATE ENTITY, Appellant, VS. JULIANA LOZA EXLEY, SPECIAL FILED ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RAY WARREN EXLEY; THE RAY JUN 0 9 2021 WARREN EXLEY, M.D.

Norman K. v Posner (2022 NY Slip Op 04499) Norman K. v Posner 2022 NY Slip Op 04499 Decided on July 8, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. <

Mark S. Davis, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Serenity C & C, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Serenity"). ECF Nos. 14, 15. The parties have requested a ruling on the briefs. ECF No. 20. After examining the briefs and the record, the Court agrees that oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented, and oral

Opinion HOCH, J. Matthew Stuard raises equal protection and substantive due process challenges to an order allowing visitation of his daughter, Riley, with paternal grandparents Jeffrey D. Stuard (Jeff) and Cynthia Stuard (Cindy). 1 The trial court award

John Z. Lee, United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Lu Aku ("Aku") filed this pro se lawsuit against his former employer, the Board of Education of the City of Chicago ("the Board"), D'Andre Weaver ("Weaver"), the principal at the school where Aku taught until 2014, and thirteen other defendants ("Non-Board Defendants"). Aku claims that the Board discrim