Cases

OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge The D.C. Circuit remanded this matter to allow the Department of Education to provide a reasoned explanation for two aspects of new rules that affect for-profit colleges and universities. On remand, the Department supplemented the preamble to its regulations to comply with the D.C. Circuit’s directiv

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge This case asks how the government should determine whether certain for-profit and vocational schools “prepare [their] students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation.” 20 U.S.C. §§ 1002(b)(1)(A)®, 1002(c)(1)(A). The Department of Education proposes one answer: it plans t

MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. The Department of Education and its Secretary (collectively, “the Department”) have moved the court to amend its judgment, which vacated 34 C.F.R. §§ 600.10(c), 600.20(d), 668.6(a), and 668.7. The Department argues that the disclosures required by 34 C.F.R. § 668.6(b)(l)(v), which the court upheld,

MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. To be eligible to accept federal funds under Title IV of the Higher Education Act, some institutions of higher education must “prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation.” 20 U.S.C. §§ 1001(b)(1), 1002(b)(1)(A)®, (c)(1)(A). Last year, the Department of Education (the “Departmen

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS. EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: Every year, Congress provides billions of dollars through loan and grant programs to help students pay tuition for their postsecondary education. The Department of Education (“the Department” or “the agency”) administers these programs, which were established unde

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. The court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is ORDERED and ADJUDG

*339OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Colleges and universities operated .for profit play “an important role in serving traditionally underrepresented populations of students” such as' those who are older, poorer, or less well educated, in addition to those who are Women, Black, Hispanic, or single parents.1 Many of

796 F.Supp.2d 108 (2011) CAREER COLLEGE ASSOCIATION d/b/a Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities, Plaintiff, v. Arne DUNCAN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 11-0138 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 12, 2011. *113 Brian M. Boynton, Randol

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) CAREER COLLEGE ASSOCIATION ) d/b/a ASSOCIATION OF PRIVATE ) SECTOR COLLEGES AND ) UNIVERSITIES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-0138 (RMC) ) ARNE DUNCAN, S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) JOSEPH JOHNSON, JR., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1171 (RMC)

746 F.Supp.2d 163 (2010) Joseph JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Arne DUNCAN, Secretary of the Department of Education, and ACS Education Solutions, LLC, Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-1171 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 29, 2010. *165 Joseph Johnson, Jr., Fort Washington, MD, pro se. <

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Plaintiff’s Motion For Summary Judgment; Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this case, the Court considers whether the Department of Education (“D

79 F.3d 1465 Phillip R. and Edna CAPPELLO, individually and Phillip R.Cappello as Administrator of the Estate of Kirk P.Cappello, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.DUNCAN AIRCRAFT SALES OF FLORIDA, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-5543. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. Argued June 12, 1995.Decided March 27, 1996.

MERRITT, Chief Judge. This diversity case for wrongful death arises from an airplane crash. The parties agreed that the substantive questions in the case are governed by Tennessee law. At 1:42 in the early morning of March 16, 1991, in fair weather, the phot of a small “Hawker” jet chartered from the defendant flew into the side of a 3,500 mountain two minutes after taking off from a closed airport in San

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) STATE OF MARYLAND, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:17-cv-2139 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) EDUCATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Filed 4/7/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DESIREE MARTINEZ, F082914 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 19CECG03855) v. CITY OF CLOVIS et al., OPINIO

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF No. 19-15072 DELAWARE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STATE OF MARYLAND; D.C. No. STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF 4:17-cv-05783- ILLINOIS; STATE OF WASHINGTON; HSG STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF VERMONT; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF HAWAII, Plai

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1954 Submitted March 24, 2021—Filed June 30, 2021 Amended September 14, 2021 CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Appellee, vs. STATE OF IOWA, TERRY BRANSTAD, Governor of the State of Iowa, in His Official Capacity, BRENNA FINDLEY, Legal Counsel to the Governor of the State of Iowa, in Her Official Capacity, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jasper Count

Case: 19-10011 Document: 00515265674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2020 REVISED January 9, 2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 18, 2019